Posted on 02/19/2012 3:57:01 AM PST by Chance Hart
First off, I am a conservative and have spent countless hours listening to and reading the books of all these men. Reading Levin's Liberty and Tyranny was compelling, as were many of the publications of these Patriots. With the VAST amount of Constitutional research accumulated in order to write these best sellers, there is and has always has been one important fact known to ALL these men to be a Constitutional FACT missing. That non negotiable FACT is that according to the Constitution, Barack Hussein Obama is NOT eligible to be placed on the ballot, let alone occupy his present position as President of the United States of America! Obama himself touts the fact that his father was a British Subject at the time of his “BHO 2’s” birth, making him at the very least a duel citizen and not eligible to hold the office as president. Furthermore, Daddy was NEVER a citizen of the United States, again making Jr. ineligible with that fact alone. None of these men (as far as I know) served in the military for whatever reason and I think there may be some suppressed guilt because of that when I hear their accolades regarding current and former Men of Honor. As they refer to many of their callers and guests as “Brother”, they at the same time have never felt compelled to commit the heroic act of jumping on a Firecracker, let alone a Grenade to help save their “Brothers” and in the end help save this Nation. Levin is the one that has disappointed me the most when I heard him disenfranchise many of his loyal listeners on Jan 19th, 2010 (may have been the 20th) by referring to those that even questioned the eligibility issue as (paraphrasing) ignorant and foolish. He followed that comment by saying that Obama was of course eligible to be President. He, in my opinion is an expert on the Constitution and knows full well that his statement was an out and out lie. When the truth finally reveals itself, I can almost hear the excuses from these Less than Honorable radio and TV Patriots now – 1. I was given strict orders from station bosses not to bring up or allow discussion on the eligibility issue and to refer to those that do bring it up as ignorant Birthers. 2. Yes, I of course knew the simple truth, but decided it was the wrong approach to be honest when the proper way to handle this was at the Ballot Box. 3. Book sales were BOOMING and I was too GUTLESS to show the Courage that I ask my listeners to display on a daily basis. 4. There are a few in the business that are standing their ground on this issue and Liberals are calling them names. Sticks and Stones will break my Bones and even Words would really hurt me because I AM A COWARD! By the way, there are thousands of these Cowards walking the halls of Congress and other places that have at least to this point failed to MAN UP. All this makes me admire all the more the few that in their heart really do trust God Almighty and FEAR NO EVIL.
In fact, they were smart enough not to even pick up YOUR BALL and run it for you.
Wise up.
Er, clueless, it's OUR ball, OUR country, one and all. Levin (especially), Limbaugh, Hannity and Ingraham are in a position to speak on issues that affect this country and do so on a regular basis. On this issue the silence was deafening especially in the case of the self proclaimed Defender of the Constitution, Mark Levin. Where is he? Under his bed? Behind his wife's skirts?
For Levin, Article II Section1, Clause 5, does not exist.
The,"Great One" as he likes to call himself. I don't think so.
He is absolutely spineless!
I think some made a similar argument to the likes of Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine.
ML/NJ
You can add Obama himself, Hillary, McCain and Chertoff to the list. They, as well as Leahy, Coburn, and Webb who agreed, signed, and pushed through McCaskill’s umpteenth attempt to get the born on US soil part of the POTUS eligibility requirements off into shady areas with McCain’s Senate vetting.
My theory is (see tagline) that the GOP is in on the game and has been from the beginning. If they can ram Mitt into office then all questions about Hussein’s term will be silenced forever and the big takeover can proceed. Mitt is no more eligible than Hussein. His father, George, was born in Mexico and there were questions about his NBC eligibility back when he was running for POTUS in the 60s. But he dropped out before it grew legs. The big question is IF he is naturalized then was it BEFORE Mitt was born? Most people who are naturalized are proud about it. Any politician, if naturalized, would use it BIG TIME to garner votes. A politician would shout it from the highest mountain day in and day out but not George. Nope, not a peep about his naturalization anywhere. It’s no where to be found. There is zip, zero, nada about it on the internet. Some claim he’s NBC because his parents were US citizens - uh, no, that doesn’t make him a NBC because he wasn’t born on US soil nor were his parents military. Some also claim he’s NBC because Mexico might/maybe/who knows give the child of foreigners Mexican citizenship - uh, no, since when does the US bow to another country’s might/maybe/who knows laws about our citizens? Mitt should be playing the naturalization and Mexican cards left and right but surprisingly he’s keeping his mouth zipped tight on all of that. So, I’m doubting George was ever naturalized since he never used it in his own campains and it’s not in his biographical write ups.
IOW, the GOP knows full well it takes TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS and BIRTHED ON US SOIL but they went out of their way in 2008 to undermine the US Constitution by running both Romney and McCain who’s birth was still shady being born outside the base but might/maybe slip by with that the US had control of the Panama Zone. Running them both was intentional. Then not having a second Senate Resolution to determine Hussein’s NBC like they did with McCain? Fishy smell. Following that having McCain pimp for Hussein and tell us we had nothing to fear from him? Huge rotten fishy smell. And finally picking Palin who they knew had baggage. The giant decomposing whale of a smell was that there’s no way all those law suits against Palin were just happenstance. No, it was a concerted effort to make sure an ineligible Hussein was the annointed one.
SCOTUS is “evading” the NBC issue and making public statemenst that the US Constitution is “old” and “outdated”. Congress has been allowing Hussein to bypass them at every step. Tin foil aside, but that tells me Hussein is just a mere bit player and that something much more evil is already here waiting to raise it’s ugly head.
I couldn’t care lees who these guys endorse or if they endorse. I don’t listen to them to tell me who to vote for.
Ever hear of Nixon?
ML/NJ
Taking the examples of the general welfare clause and the interstate commerce clause, the courts were NEVER going to appeal to original intent regarding NBC.
Mainstream dominant law schools and lawyers reject original intent as a concept. They weren’t going to let it in the back door with NBC.
Talkers mostly play the cards they’re dealt. “Life isn’t fair.”
Ludricrous also, is your transparent attempt to try and intimidate our great heros of conservatism on talk radio into carrying your pet issues for you to their massive audiences. Ain't gonna happen, so give it a rest, and go get your own show where you can bore people to death with your neurotic obsessions.
Fine, the judge rejects the plaintiff’s argument by using an irrelevant case from another state....
How do you explain this -
The judge rules in favor of obozo for not showing up (Utter contempt of the court), and presenting no argument - the judge was acting as obozo’s attorney, using the plaintiff’s ‘insufficient’ doc (the bogus bc) to say obozo was born in Hawaii, and, takes it on himself to decide just because obozo is deemed born in Hawaii, he is a nbc!
If you refuse to see the facts, there is no reasoning with you.
I can understand if you say it is useless becasue no one wants to be the one to rule against obozo no matter how much merits our cases have, but to conclude that the lawsuits have no valid argument, one must be blind!
The revolutionary war was about breaking the chains of tyranny's... Today if Obama is removed by force it will unleash forces we have no idea where it will take us... I am not sure it will be worth it because he will be history very soon
But obzoz is NOT the president. He is a usurper.
Only a legitimate president can be impeached.
A usurper has to be REMOVED, as in wiped out, never existed, there is no 44th president until the next legitimate president is elected.
Levin has for obvious reasons scrubbed that 2010 comment to the best of his ability, although I will find it. While I am looking, take a listen to this. His 2011 feeling about We the People who question O’s eligibility is stated Loud and Clear by Levin himself and I don’t appreciate it. Remark starts at 4:26 and runs through 4.34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RY_XYBlq3gQ
Nixon resigned voluntarily when evidence had been gathered.
Birthers are demanding that Obama give them the proof they want.
Good luck with that.
"Our great heros"? Don't you mean your great heros? Or do you now speak for everyone?
Isolate and ridicule? Isn't that right out of Alinsky's playbook?
Yell, scream all you want. It doesn't change history. Mark Levin ignores Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of OUR Constitution which compromises or dilutes his defense of other constitutional issues. He wimped out big time while others have sacrificed their lives defending it.
There is one great thing about Free Republic. These threads cannot be erased. So unlike your thin-skinned "hero" Levin who scrubs all criticism from his website, Twitter and Facebook accounts, Thankfully, he can't do it here.
Who is yet talking about removing him by force? If the MSM printed the truth about him the way they did about Nixon, he could possibly be shamed into leaving too.
ML/NJ
I really don’t know. Why hasn’t a lesser conservative like a Herman Cain come forth and simply QUERY whether a guy who is using phony documents is really legally American? They would have less to lose.
Actually both have produced enough evidence against themselves. The problem is that the MSM only reported the evidence against Nixon. Were they to have done the same with Obama he would likely have followed Nixon's example or at least have been politically neutered.
ML/NJ
-—If the MSM printed the truth about him the way they did about Nixon, he could possibly be shamed into leaving too.——
Ok then you have entered into the surreal...Obama has no shame and the MSM could not tell the truth about zero if they had a gun to their head
Correction: He "scrubs all BIG DOPES", that have no coherent arguments, only neurotic, simple-minded ad hominum attacks.
Look in the mirror. See the monkey?
The front we avoid is the only one that can undo all of the wrongs that Obama has done. It is curious that none in power dare challenge him on this. Really makes you wonder who or what is in charge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.