“A no-fly zone would accomplish what, exactly?â€
Depends on what kind of flies?
Posted on 11/16/2015 3:35:35 PM PST by conservativejoy
It’s a “wordy” answer, I’ll give you that.
I don’t agree with the statement, at least as it refers to Trump, but I have read that from two other sources.
Some read the headline and react. Others read the article considering Dr. Carson’s neurology expertise. The human brain is designed to think; the animal’s is to react. His statement was in context with the question asked.
The KGB was the secret police and Pravda was the newspaper.
You gain your political insight from a leftist website?
“A no-fly zone would accomplish what, exactly?â€
Depends on what kind of flies?
It exposes how out-of-touch the establishment elite are.
“The KGB was the secret police and Pravda was the newspaper.”
YES, Yes, Yes - Different arms of the same devil. But there a many who simply do not remember. Worse are still there are many enthralled with Communist/SS disinformation and how well it works on the 80%
A shooting war with Russia over Suria?
I’ve done my Middle East time popping them for neocons once already, and my brother was blown up by an IED.
Next time, glass them over.
Supporting Carson is beyond naive.
I understood what he said, but why would we want to shoot down Russian planes over Syria, when Syria has given them permission to fly there? Currently Russia is doing the job against ISIS that Obama won’t do.
“But his answers were reasonable to someone who has the intellect to understand them. I can understand. The reporter is too stupid to get it.
On what planet is sparking WWIII by provoking a shooting war with Russia a good idea?!
Carley says that she’ll do the same thing! Jeb backed her with that during the debate.
Do these people think that this is what the American people want to hear or are they actually insane enough to do this?!
NO SHOOTING AT RUSSIA UNLESS THEY SHOOT AT US FIRST. Got it?
Sheesh!
My political insight comes from Carson’s own words. I don’t care about the authors comments. The article was almost all transcript of the interview.
At least Carson and Hillary are on the same page.
Carson’s words are what I call into question. The article was almost entirely transcript of his interview. The fact that he agrees with Hillary is crazy enough.
O-o
He’s nutz.
Well...You have to take that into the proper context where a no-fly zone is the topic.
Initially the Russians told the US and allies to get out or risk being shot down...They replied in kind, by issuing orders to pilots that their guns were free in case of a danger caused by Russian aircraft.
After that the Russians complained and they made some sort of a deal.
I think Carson was saying that the US should man-up, impose a restricted airspace corridor for these refugees in Syria, rather than have them running all over the damn place. If this were done without Russian agreement, the only possible choice would be the weapons free option for any incursion into the corridor.
This sort of zone has been proposed many times, and I only saw one no fly zone that was implemented in the last 20-30 years and that was in Iraq against Hussein..
These thing generally cause more problems then they are worth, but if one were to create a protected area for the refugees, the Russians would have to agree with it, or you might as well declare war on them, which frankly I would not object to.
You're a disgrace.
Politics USA sounds like Salon or Huffington Post.
Amazed that anyone here gives this any credence.
Not a fan either (Go Cruz!) but (in transcript form,anyway) his answers were pretty rational, although rambling.
If a person couldn’t follow his reasoning, that says something about them indeed.
Mrs. AV
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.