Was the Moon Landing Faked? This man believes it was! (Video)

Valuetainment ^ | Patrick Bet-David, Bart Sibrel

[Jan_Sobieski]

Patrick Bet-David sits down with Bart Sibrel, an American author and fil maker who has written, produced, and directed works in support of the belief that the Apollo Moon Landings between 1969 and 1972 were staged by NASA under the control of the CIA…

[Campion]

Apollo only took about 15 minutes to get through the Van Allen belts. They aren’t a “wall” at all.

[ConservativeDude]

thank you. there have been some great resource recommendations in this thread.

[C210N]

It amazes me about today's FR, a post revolving around apollo and CIA lies, and no mention of any of:

1. Operation Mockingbird, Church Committee - Church Committee, 1975. Op Mockingbird

2. Stanley Kubrick, 2001 Space Odyssey - Kubrick Confession (dramatization, reportedly)

[cgbg]

The radiation “measurements” through the Van Allen belt that were preserved from Apollo 11 are a total joke—blatantly fake.

That is why current astronauts in the Artemis program keep talking about radiation risks—they know.

[Campion]

Take a look at the command and lunar module computers—there was no way they could possibly work—and NASA knew it. That meant navigation became impossible once the communications delay from Earth kicked in.... (four seconds each way to the Moon) which in turn would mean certain death for the astronauts:

That is complete nonsense. It's even factually wrong. Just divide 250000 (distance earth-to-moon in miles) by 186282 (speed of light in a vacuum in miles per second). You get about 1 1/3 seconds. Round-trip it was about 2 1/2 seconds.

"Navigation becomes impossible" with a 2 1/2 second roundtrip comms lag? Why?

[Campion]

Wrong.

However, it is true that Apollo, which had a steel skin, is probably a better radiation shield than Artemis will be.

[cgbg]

The best conspiracy movie on this topic was “Capricorn One”.

OJ Simpson starred as one of the four astronauts on a faked Mars landing.

[C210N]

Thank you.

While no mention of Op Mockingbird and Kubrick, very important to question the Allen radiation belts.

[cgbg]

A few seconds and a wrong turn and you are dead—”cold equations”.

[central_va]

OJ Simpson starred as one of the four astronauts on a faked Mars landing.

I'll bet he was a real cut up on the set.

[cgbg]

“cut up on the set”

Lol.

Spoiler alert.

He died an ugly death in the movie—right here on planet Earth.

[Fledermaus]

They didn’t need Photoshop, movie people could do things on film since it’s invention.

Heck, the Soviets could erase and add people to photographs in the 40s and 50s and 60s.

[central_va]

He died an ugly death in the movie—right here on planet Earth.

Ugly indeed no matter how you slice it.

[Campion]

That's a non-answer. We're talking about celestial bodies moving at known velocities. You schedule course corrections and the like in the future -- even if "the future" is only 20 minutes away, that blows any 1 1/2 second comms lag out of the water.

And, except on Apollo 13 where they had to do some seat-of-the-pants because systems had failed, you program the relevant commands into the onboard computer, which was very simple but enough to do the job, and it takes care of timing burns and attitude correctly. And that's all you need.

The actual computations were done by top-of-the-line IBM mainframes on the ground; the onboard computers were only responsible for physically executing the burns.

[Fledermaus]

Those 1100 year scientists were smart. LOL

Typos.

[cgbg]

More on Capricorn One—Hal Holbrook was outstanding as the NASA boss managing the coverup and “handling” the astronauts—first by telling them it was their patriotic duty to lie and then when that didn’t work telling them their families would be killed if they did not play ball.

[Campion]

Hollywood cameraman says tech did not exist to fake the moon landings in 1969

[cgbg]

Those onboard computers could not “physically execute” anything—they were props for the dupes.

[cgbg]

Imho Capricorn One was what some of us “conspiracy types” call “limited disclosure”—using fiction to subliminally prepare the peons for future revelations.

[discostu]

We could do it. We just couldn’t do it with THAT technology. Largely because it’s just too old and crappy and we just can’t replicate it anymore. There was a balancing act of bad technologies helping each other work in spite of how cruddy they were. And of course it was all built from machines with the same balance of crappiness going on.

It would be like trying to make a brand new as it was Model T. We just don’t have the stuff to make machines that bad but still working anymore.