Posted on 11/15/2008 6:48:02 PM PST by palmer
"666?" Sure..
You got it.
Aw. how sweet? Now that I have the nuts, I’ll be happy to send your shells right back at ya!
You're a janitor in a hospital?
You said — “This birth certificate nonsense is fool’s bait.”
Well, if that’s true and it’s simply “fool’s bait” — then Obama is quite the fool, too for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in several different courts around the country — all the while trying to prevent anyone from seeing the original birth certificate.
If that’s the kind of President that we will have (soon) in January, then we’ve got an idiot for a President, who apparently thinks it’s a wise thing and an efficient and effective thing to spend all those hundreds of thousands of dollars for all those court cases — instead of — simply spending about $5 or $10 for a certified original copy — and show everyone... LOL...
Mike In The Morning Calls The Kenyan Embassy {Statue Erected to Honor Obama’s Kenyan Birth}
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2135992/posts
Looking at this image, it appears that the type in the middle section, (especially names, etc.) is not photographic.
That is to say, the print appears to have been digitally superimposed on the digital image of the photo. If this was done, then the forger would have used a form with those particular spaces left blank. This print is of such a dark quality, that it just looks entirely faked to me.
Also...
Even though the middle portion of the folded document is in shadow in the photo, and the letters are in black "ink", there should be some slight reflectivity to those letters, but there isn't. They're as inky black as this bold print, which is digital, and cannot reflect light.
In all fairness, the type on the lower third looks to be far more photographic, i.e., as if it were already imprinted on the paper when the photo was taken, though upon close inspection, it appears that color manipulation could account for that.
Granted, I'm not an expert document analyst, but I've got clear enough eyesight to spot these inconsistencies.
Anyone else notice this?
Who checks the facts on Factcheck.org?
I pointed out the tactics of the BC truthers because it doesn't look good to cross post to other forums. Nor does it look good to post misinformation which they also admitted to. This thread is the sum total of my "bad behavior" on this topic. I named names and made accusations and those still stand. But I have not engaged in any backchannel gossip or other such activities.
Here you say that your fears were unfounded in retrospect.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3963143/posts?page=54#54
But ours were NOT. The republic was lost due to Berg vs. Obama.
You were full of shiite back then and you’re full of it even now.
It is people like you who caused us to luze our republic; it is an oligarchy now.
We are losing the republic because people don't want to deal with the real world of ballot stuffing, and the newly created harvesting and other mail-in fraud in the last election. Instead they find a new Polarik or two to create long drivelous videos about Dominion vote counting machines that don't do what Frank says they do. Or Dr. Shiva whose downward sloping curve "proof" of voting machine fraud is obviously wrong since Biden votes show the same curve. The Frank theory is obviously wrong, the counting machines only count anonymous ballots, so they can't adjust votes based on any kind of demographics.
Don't know if you subscribe to either or both (they are contradictory) theories. Nor do I care. I simply point out crap whenever I come across it. It's my job as an engineer.
Or they just hire disinformation operatives like you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.