Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DAY 10 OF VAN DAM MURDER TRIAL...VERDICT WATCH!!!
Union Trib ^ | August 21, 2002 | San Diego Staff

Posted on 08/20/2002 9:37:45 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Discovery hearing set as jurors deliberate for ninth day


SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 20, 2002

A request by the prosecution in the David Westerfield kidnap-murder trial to obtain more evidence or information, originally scheduled for a 10:30 a.m. hearing, has been vacated.Jurors in the trial of David Westerfield, the man charged with abducting and killing 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, resume deliberations in San Diego on Monday as speculation mounts that the panel is having trouble reaching a verdict. The jury has so far spent 28 hours, spread over seven days, considering Westerfield's fate. Westerfield is shown in a July 22 courtroom photo. Photo by Pool/Reuters

Word of the hearing's cancellation was relayed to media representatives shortly after 10 a.m. today.

The subject of the discovery motion filed by lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek was not disclosed. No reason was given for the hearing's cancellation.

Today is the ninth day of deliberation by jurors. Today's deliberating session began at 9:07 a.m., according to a public information officer.

Westerfield, 50, is accused of the kidnap and murder of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, who disappeared from her bedroom in her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2.

 


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 180frank; blood; childpornography; daniellevandam; dna; groupies; horndog; kidnapping; sandiego; sweat; tears; vandam; vandamswingers; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-202 next last
To: spectre
CTV is getting on my last nerve. They keep acting like a guilty verdict is a sure thing! Ugh!!! Please let them be wrong. My mother in law has watched the trial too on CTV, and even she said she would have to vote not guilty because of reasonable doubt (she volunteered that info BEFORE I told her how I felt). So, she filtered out all the media crap and made up her own mind. Let's hope the jury did too.
141 posted on 08/21/2002 10:17:44 AM PDT by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: spectre
We're still here. Just hang on.
142 posted on 08/21/2002 10:17:45 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
We can, PM--but only over here. Over here, we can sit around and use them for word-dart targets all we want--if attacked.
143 posted on 08/21/2002 10:18:09 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; spectre
ooh mercy, pray like you've never prayed before!!!!!!

Oh please, please.....

144 posted on 08/21/2002 10:19:31 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Well, remember they have another choice, and they looked at all the evidence fairly thoroughly. It could be "Not guilty."

Yes, I agree and must keep the faith :)

145 posted on 08/21/2002 10:19:50 AM PDT by brneyedgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Remember, fellow DW Warriors, Feldman says he has evidence he will bring forth if the verdict is guilty.

When did he say that?

146 posted on 08/21/2002 10:20:24 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; All
Brenda didn't POINT the finger at DW. We have had it all wrong. Remember, Denise didn't find DW 'creepy' until after his arrest.

Remember, we questioned why the FBI was brought in, why the FBI dog was brought in?

Remember it was weird that the SDPD searched DW's house looking for PORN and found it? We thought Damon might have been involved in telling them or planting it? NOT.

Remember one of the members of the CHILD PORN RING was arrested Jan 27th.

The Swedish group and the FBI were cooperating (operation CANDYMAN) on finding members of this RING. Anyone that even loaded any kind of PORN which contained apparent or faked CHILD RAPE was going to be investigated as being part of this RING.

FBI was in the area searching for these members. The Swedish group gave them lists of all who SENT/RECEIVED this CHILD PORN, or ANYONE that even tried to download something that might be CONSIDERED CHILD PORN, especially with RAPE in it.

SO, when Danielle disappeared The FBI gave DW as one of the addresses (internet) that had attempted or did download CHILD oriented PORN or RAPE PORN.

That still didn't give police enough probably cause. So, they took the info from Brenda (about her convo's with DW) and interviewed DW. When he said Brenda told him about Damon saying Danielle was growing up fast, etc) they went back to Brenda. She said she didn't remember if she told him.

SO the SDPD then used that and other statements, added a little to them (said she denied saying it, not just didn't remember) AND GOT A WARRANT. BRENDA and DAMON didn't point the finger. THE FBI did. Then SDPD was SURE they had their man.

These RING members were known for kidnapping little girls and RAPING THEM. The Swedish group /FBI pointed the SDPD at DW and SO THEY WERE SURE. When it turned out his son downloaded the stuff and neither Neal nor DW had anything to do with this CHILD PORN RING, it was too late.

They had some 'real thin' evidence, but they still thought it was possible DW was one of these GUYS. Heck, they already had ONE of them, and arrested the next one on FEB 18th.

The SDPD thought they were on a roll.

147 posted on 08/21/2002 10:20:48 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Lanza
dont worry- they all were so sure andrea yates would walk too! i will never forget the shocked look on some of their faces--
148 posted on 08/21/2002 10:20:52 AM PDT by Tiger28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; All
OK you guys, group hug, hold on, we can get through this together. PRAY! I can't even imagine what DW is going through right now.
149 posted on 08/21/2002 10:21:24 AM PDT by the-gooroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
I think we all better get ahold of our emotions and NOT let the threadjackals entice us into a fight, no matter what the outcome. OK???? Good advice.
150 posted on 08/21/2002 10:21:49 AM PDT by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
...not a biggie.

Yes, Kim, it is a 'biggie', because you want to play by your own rules and then continue to whine about how unfair people are to you. You started something with your attitude and there are enough of us here who are sick of you and your distortions.

Warning --- no one is going to take your crap anymore in the smokeroom. If the fire's too hot, leave the kitchen.

151 posted on 08/21/2002 10:21:57 AM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; FresnoDA
Fres? You here?

We can thank Judge Mudd and the media bias, especially Court TV if the verdict comes back guilty...

You all think the Van Dams are going to appear on Larry King tonight?!

152 posted on 08/21/2002 10:23:03 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: brneyedgirl
WHy can't it be a hung jury? what are the local mediaidiots saying?
153 posted on 08/21/2002 10:23:20 AM PDT by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

Comment #154 Removed by Moderator

To: the-gooroo
PRAY.....PRAY.....PRAY.....

..the jackals on ctv are already having a field day speculating on the verdict, and I can't stand it anymore!

Please PRAY!

155 posted on 08/21/2002 10:24:17 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Tiger28
Thank you tiger. They also thought Skakel would walk.
156 posted on 08/21/2002 10:24:57 AM PDT by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Countdown to Nasty Grace lift-off ...
157 posted on 08/21/2002 10:27:06 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; Kerensky; John Jamieson
Winners of the pool will be: Kerensky - 2 pm, John Jamieson Ucansee2, and Gona B. Good work, guys!

Well, I had a list of qualifiers and so far, only the one about the PADRES is true. So I concede to others on the list. So far, looks like KERENSKY is the TRUE WINNER!

158 posted on 08/21/2002 10:27:14 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
How & when did you know this?
159 posted on 08/21/2002 10:27:18 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Please someone tell me they are recording CTV and NG for this. If this verdict comes back not guilty I'll buy a copy!
160 posted on 08/21/2002 10:27:27 AM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson