Skip to comments.
"Married to the Mob" and other stop-Jeanine sillygisms
8.09.05
| Mia T
Posted on 08/09/2005 9:13:31 AM PDT by Mia T
"Married to the Mob" and other stop-Jeanine sillygisms
- by Mia T, 8.09.05
-
JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
|
THE POLLS:
The polls today reflect relative name recognition and not much more.
As one might guess, clinton's name recognition is 100%. This does not bode well for clinton. Any vote she doesn't already have, she will not get. Conversely, many voters know 0% about the clintons' abuses (of women, of power, etc.), know 0% about their utter failures (especially as it concerns terrorism, 9/11 and, indeed, the first WTC bombing, a uniquely pesky issue for New Yorkers, it seems to me).
Pirro's name recognition, on the other hand, is only 30%. She has a lot of room to grow those numbers; and she will.
If Jeanine's numbers look threatening by Fall, hillary will drop out of the race and do so before her entire (meaningless, 100%-name-recognition) lead evaporates -- this according to Dick Morris (O'Reilly 8-8-05).
It is telling that only with the entry of Pirro into the race did clinton acknowledge a challenger. (Her failure to cite Pirro by name only underscores clinton's alarm,)
clinton obviously regards Pirro as a real threat, as well she should. Pirro is everything clinton pretends to be.
NEW YORK LEANS RIGHT -- WITNESS D'AMATO'S DEFEAT OF JAVITS and HOLTZMAN:
Time frame aside, this counterexample is laughable. D'Amato's defeat of incumbent Jacob Javits in the 1980 Senate Republican primary, and his win in the general election, are hardly examples of a highminded ideological victory.
In the primary, D'Amato took advantage not of Javits' RINO leanings -- (the term didn't even exist then) -- but rather of Javits' 1979 diagnosis of generally fatal amytrophic lateral sclerosis. Some victory.
What Javits did next actually confirms New York's leftist leanings and reinforces my argument to coalesce.
Javits went on to run on the Liberal Party ticket, splitting the left-wing vote in liberal New York with Democratic Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman, thereby enabling D'Amato's 45% plurality victory.
SHE'S MARRIED TO THE MOB:
Married to the same husband, Jeanine Pirro repeatedly won elective office, aggressively fought crime, reduced crime, fought for the vulnerable, the abused, battered, raped.
The contrast with missus clinton's zipper-hoisted "career" of corruption and abuse could not be more stark.
We used to execute rapists. Today we elect them president?
SHE'S NOT TOUGH ENOUGH:
Either Pirro is 'married to the Mob' or she ain't.
You can fault her ideology, but you cannot fault her toughness. Please.
HILLARY IS 'A STAR,' JEANINE ISN'T EVEN A HOUSEHOLD NAME:
Jeanine may not yet be a household name; as I have argued above, this is actually a plus at this stage of the game.
As for star power, most people, I believe, will agree that she undeniably has it.
Conversely, hillary's 'star power' is really name recognition.
hillary is a dud. Even the clintons understand this. (SCHEMA PINOCCHIO:how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor)
|
-
|
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor
by Mia T, 8.03.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MAD hillary series #5
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN
FOR AMERICA
FOR THE WORLD
- They turned our bridge to the 21st century into a tunnel back into the 19th century. Back us out of that Republican tunnel, fill it in, go back across the bridge.... We'll have a giant celebration when we come back to Columbus in 2020. There's nothing more wonderful than making dreams come true.
-
hear hillary clinton
address to the Democratic Leadership Council
Columbus, Ohio
7.31.05
issus clinton is a dud.
I could say she has all of bill clinton's baggage and none of his charm, except I don't find bill clinton charming. What she lacks, in my view, is lubricant. Snake oil. She grates.
It's more than simple dislike. You don't want to see her; and you definitely don't want to hear her.
Missus clinton is everyman's worst nightmare: ex-wife, fishwife, frigid wife, mother-in-law; worse, the abusive Nazi commandant in the Lina Wertmuller masterpiece. When she humiliates, which is always, she dons the military-issue undershirt, she grabs the whip.
The clintons are clearly aware of this problem and are attempting to mitigate it with veneer.
Their first ploy is to pushpoll to artificially jack up missus clinton's numbers; this is a relatively easy task, given a compliant press. This illusion of electability is intended to fool the voters, activate the herd mentality and ultimately fool the smart money of the David Geffen-Harold Ickes stripe.
It won't work. Missus clinton has 100% name recognition. Any vote she doesn't already have, she won't get. Conversely, many voters have 0% information on the clinton abuses of power and utter failures. From this it follows that many votes she has today, she won't have tomorrow.
Their second ploy is to conflate "bill" and "hillary." "The clintons" become a single construct. Missus clinton arrogates bill's "bridge to the 21st century " as "theirs." And, by lifting the lyrics straight from Pinocchio, she becomes "the man from 'hope'."
The danger here for missus clinton is that with the bridge and the hope come the abuses and the utter failures.
AFTERWORD:
|
Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches? They make her sound like a cross between Pinocchio on Halcyon and a clueless tourist from Park Ridge, Illinois driving into Manhattan during rush hour. Oops.
And the plagiarizing... I mean, the clintons are shameless. And it isn't only Pinocchio.
In 2002, I wrote that the bridge to the 21st century was, arguably, clinton's most delusional conceit, that it overshot the mark by at least 1400 years.
To be fair, missus clinton's 19th-century reference is to that <yawn> retrograde 'retrograde Republicans' cliché, whereas my 7th-century reference is to the retrograde-in-fact islamofascist terrorists, whose jihadi declarations and acts of war against us the clintons willfully ignored for eight long years--allowing al Qaeda to grow exponentially in strength and reach, setting us up--very nicely, thank you--for 9/11 and its cataclysmic aftermath.
|
-
|
|
-
- Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches?
- A "handling the hillary dud factor" AFTERWORD
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor
NANO-PRESIDENT, MEGA-DISASTER
history will not be kind to bill + hillary clinton
NANO-PRESIDENT
the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton
BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman
HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET (MAD COVER 2)
Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update
For the children?
the clintons ARE pornography downloads
ROE, MEDICAL SCIENCE, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, ROSS PEROT + HILLARY CLINTON
HEAR MAD hillary talks #3:
"What, me worry?"
the significance of missus clinton's gratuitous gerundial g-droppings
CONDI RICE-HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP-2008
(BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST2)
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
HILLARY'S TRIPLE PLAY
the clinton putsch + filegate + the gorelick wall
How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!)
Alfred E. Neuman + the threat of terrorism, according to hillary
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE
THE OLYMPIC HILDABEAST FLOPS
hillary stupidly invokes clinton utter failure: 9/11
HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
clinton agitprop machine censors truth about hillary
BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST
- JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman
- HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women
-
- CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")
hillary clinton: ABUSER, NOT VICTIM
retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]
NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES
CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)
1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)
HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue
JENNINGS DOES A DIMBLEBY: clinton legacy-RAGE redux
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
THE JEANINE PIRRO--HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP
Hillary vs. Jeanine?
JEANINE PIRRO: indefinite prison/psych-ward term for all rapists
(HILLARY CLINTON: 16-year oval-office term for 2 certain rapists)
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; jeanine; pirro; senaterace2006
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: 1Old Pro; Mia T; doug from upland
Here's the math: The NY democrats go into every election with over 90% of the African-American vote, over 90% of the Jewish vote; maybe 85% of the 'Hispanic' vote; and overwhelming counts in the Union vote, The Gay Vote, The Native American vote... you name the special interest group, the NY democrats have it wrapped up. In Southern New York State, that's all she wrote, folks. The good Norwegians of Bay Ridge Brooklyn will turn out for the Republican. All 7 of them.
The white men of the country are usually about 65% Republican. The deal maker or breaker is the WHITE WOMAN VOTER. She is fluid ... can go either way. The women can make ... or break ...Jeanine Pirro in New York State. Problem: I think young women think Hillary is GOD.
It is going to take a hard, smart, and very costly effort to ensure (a) a really big turnout (b) the white women's vote and (IMHO that's the combo that put Pataki in, for better or worse) (c) a smack-down on the vote fraud that characterizes NYC votes in the rotten boroughs of the Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn, as well as in, I am sorry to say, highly ethnocentric communities throughout the state, and the 'urban' areas of the other big towns, where African American churches use federal dollars to van their congregations to 8 or 9 different precincts, but not before having voted them absentee innumerable times. And remember, in NYC, Like Philly, Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit,King County, and St. Louis, the dead are merely absent democrats who vote early and often (actually they vote late, and exactly as needed.)
Easy to say. Very expensive to buy. In addition to the money, there's the problem of smarts. The Republicans could have done better for Lazio if they had used the Yellow Pages to select their advertising and organizational people. If even one of the usual cast of those Clymers is involved in the Pirro deal, she's a goner.
I hope The DOJ can get in here to some good purpose, as they did to smack down fraud in Missouri and Maryland.
Interesting case. I really think, in my cynical-veteran--of-many- a- Republican campaign, that the GOP just might care more about the damage Pirro can do to Hillary, and don't give a hoot whether she pulls out a victory or not.
To: YaYa123
the arcana amazes. ;)
I agree with your assessment of Pirro. As for hubby's alleged Mob connection, it was Jeanine's!! crimebusting wiretap that provided the only link, (a highly suspect link).
22
posted on
08/09/2005 6:31:59 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
I really think Pirro has a good chance of winning....once the word gets around of how abusive Hillary is, and it will get out...
Also, don't forget Donald Trump likes Pirro.....maybe alot of people don't listen to The Donald, but he does have some pull in N. Y.
And once this Air America gets out in full bloom, the media has got to open it up soon or they are going to get blasted by the cable people, Al Franken is Hillary's dearest friend on earth...and some of that will rub off, no matter how much they try to hid it...
This Peter thing had some effect on her....I have a good friend in N.Y. and she told me there was some people she works with that didn't think that was to good....
If the Clinton smear machine trys to down Pirro, I'm afraid the people aren't going to take to kindly to it, and it will work in Pirro's favor and against Thunder Thighs...
And who else is she going to hug and kiss? Mrs. Arafat is gone, along with everyone else....after that stunt....
23
posted on
08/09/2005 6:42:01 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: Kenny Bunk
- The deal maker or breaker is the WHITE WOMAN VOTER. She is fluid ... can go either way. The women can make ... or break ...Jeanine Pirro in New York State. Problem: I think young women think Hillary is GOD.
My math appears to be consistent with yours.
In order to have any chance of winning (in order to offset her almost universal repulsiveness to men), missus clinton must get virtually every moderate female vote extant...
which she won't when we fill them in on the clintons' 30-year record of abusive and criminal treatment of women...
or when we inform the 'security moms' of the clintons' utter failure to fight terrorism.
(see HAROLD ICKES: on winning the presidency by terrorizing white women)
The elephants in the room:
- We used to execute rapists. Today we elect them president?
Most of the problems we face today are traceable to the Senate's utter failure to do its constitutional duty in 1998.
P.S. I believe hillary got 70% of the Jewish vote in 2000. An increasing number of younger Jewish voters are voting Republican. Post-9/11, even some older Jewish voters have changed their thinking,. My 85-year-old relative, for example, who voted democrat all his life, voted for Bush in '04. I don't believe he will ever vote Democrat again. As for clinton vote fraud in black communities, see:
- THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update
-
|
24
posted on
08/09/2005 7:26:13 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
The election of '92 will remain one of the great mysteries of the 20th century. Bush 41 tanked. He gave up. He ran a sloppy, lackluster campaign. He refused to use specific ammunition he had about Bill Clinton. After all, Mia, the guy had been head of the CIA! Clinton left bloody fingerprints all over Arkansas, and Bush 41 didn't even challenge him on crime.
The question is always going to be, "What did Clinton have on him?" If this theory is not sustainable, what the heck theory is?!
But that's history. Here's what counts now. I think we had better not count on the common sense of the voters in knowing just what evil charlatans the Clintons are. They have heard it too long. They have heard too much. Plus, the MSM has always been able to make it look like the worst episodes in the Clintons' record are the wild ravings of right-wing fanatics. The truth about these people is so bad, no one believes it!
The visceral hatred the NYC intelligentsia has for the Republican Party is extreme. I believe it descends in a direct line from the 1930's Communist Party of their parents and grandparents. The fact, for example, that Hillary is a demonstrable anti-semite means nothing to them. What matters is that she is ideologically in tune and attuned to their extreme left-wing views. Politically correct means more than personally reprehensible.
So, I fear that even if Pirro has the guts to go for Hillary's jugular, she will serve the GOP well, but might not win the election.
To: Mia T
The election of '92 will remain one of the great mysteries of the 20th century. Bush 41 tanked. He gave up. He ran a sloppy, lackluster campaign. He refused to use specific ammunition he had about Bill Clinton. After all, Mia, the guy had been head of the CIA! Clinton left bloody fingerprints all over Arkansas, and Bush 41 didn't even challenge him on crime.
The question is always going to be, "What did Clinton have on him?" If this theory is not sustainable, what the heck theory is?!
But that's history. Here's what counts now. I think we had better not count on the common sense of the voters in knowing just what evil charlatans the Clintons are. They have heard it too long. They have heard too much. Plus, the MSM has always been able to make it look like the worst episodes in the Clintons' record are the wild ravings of right-wing fanatics. The truth about these people is so bad, no one believes it!
The visceral hatred the NYC intelligentsia has for the Republican Party is extreme. I believe it descends in a direct line from the 1930's Communist Party of their parents and grandparents. The fact, for example, that Hillary is a demonstrable anti-semite means nothing to them. What matters is that she is ideologically in tune and attuned to their extreme left-wing views. Politically correct means more than personally reprehensible.
So, I fear that even if Pirro has the guts to go for Hillary's jugular, she will serve the GOP well, but might not win the election.
To: Mia T
27
posted on
08/10/2005 4:44:25 AM PDT
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: Kenny Bunk
the GOP just might care more about the damage Pirro can do to Hillary, and don't give a hoot whether she pulls out a victory or not. I think Pirro et al are in this to win. If she loses yet damages Hillary and makes hilly raise and spend 40 mil then it's better than not having a credible candidate at all.
28
posted on
08/10/2005 6:29:19 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Mia T
29
posted on
08/10/2005 7:23:08 AM PDT
by
jla
To: jla
30
posted on
08/10/2005 10:20:52 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
31
posted on
08/10/2005 10:24:42 AM PDT
by
jla
To: jla
32
posted on
08/10/2005 12:41:05 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
33
posted on
08/10/2005 5:17:51 PM PDT
by
jla
To: 1Old Pro; Kenny Bunk; Wolverine; jla
34
posted on
08/10/2005 10:28:15 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Kenny Bunk
The election of '92 will remain one of the great mysteries of the 20th century. Bush 41 tanked. He gave up. He ran a sloppy, lackluster campaign. He refused to use specific ammunition he had about Bill Clinton. After all, Mia, the guy had been head of the CIA! Clinton left bloody fingerprints all over Arkansas, and Bush 41 didn't even challenge him on crime.The question is always going to be, "What did Clinton have on him?" If this theory is not sustainable, what the heck theory is?! Kenny Bunk
|
|
Note Bush 41's allusion, during the presidential debate, to clinton corruption. Note also that Bush understood well the clinton threat to the security of our nation. But that wasn't enough, apparently, for Bush to end clinton's career once and for all. And we all know the sorry result of that failure.
The way I see it, the possibilities for Bush failure are, in descending order of probability, the following:
- Whereas the clintons failed because they put corrupt, cowardly, megalomaniacal self-interest above loyalty to country, the Bushes failed because they put their refined aesthetic sensibilities, family loyalty and misplaced honor above loyalty to country.
- stupidity
- blackmail
|
- THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992*
|
*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio
|
LEHRER: President Bush, your closing statement, sir. PRESIDENT BUSH: Three weeks from now--two weeks from tomorrow, America goes to the polls and you're going to have to decide who you want to lead this country ... On foreign affairs, some think it's irrelevant. I believe it's not. We're living in an interconnected world...And if a crisis comes up, ask who has the judgment and the experience and, yes, the character to make the right decision? And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word. And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America. (Applause)
-
|
- FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!
|
35
posted on
09/13/2005 6:34:28 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
correction:
should be "The way I see it, the possible causes for Bush failure are, in descending order of probability, the following:"
36
posted on
09/13/2005 6:39:10 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
