Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Semi-News: “Brokeback Mountain” Success Inspires Hollywood
AZCONSERVATIVE ^ | 30 Dec 2005 | John Semmens

Posted on 01/01/2006 9:24:29 PM PST by John Semmens

Exhibitor Relations Co. reports that over Dec. 10-11 weekend, the film brought in the highest per-screen average for any film release in 2005. "Brokeback Mountain" has also landed awards from the Los Angeles Film Critics Associations and the New York Film Critics Circle.

Plans are now in the works to do a gay/bestiality version of the “Lone Ranger.”

Pinky Sfinktir, press secretary for the Screen Actors’ Guild, called the move a “no-brainer.” “If movie-goers turn out to see two no-name cowboys go at it, imagine the impact when icons like the Lone Ranger and Tonto hit the sack together,” said Sfinktir.

The bestiality angle is motivated by two goals, says Sfinktir. “On the one hand, there is the creative desire to push the envelope,” Sfinktir said. “The gay thing has been pretty much mainstreamed for the American viewing audiences. We need to take it to the next level.”

“On the other hand, the famous ‘hi-yo Silver’ catch-phrase is a natural marketing hook for promoting the film,” said Sfinktir.

The plotline starts out with the Lone Ranger’s special relationship with Silver. One evening, Tonto dons the rear half of a horse costume and seduces a drunken Lone Ranger. Eventually, a passionate three-way relationship is established. When not engaged in carnal interactions, the heroes track down and arrest an outlaw gang that has perpetrated a series of hate-crimes against a gay “Dude Ranch.”

Other homofied stories in the mill include action-adventure “Batman & Robin (the Boy Wonder),” historical epic “Robinhood & His Very Merry Men,” and a musical-comedy “Man of la Macho.”

(Excerpt) Read more at azconservative.org ...


TOPICS: Humor; Music/Entertainment; Politics
KEYWORDS: brokebackmountain; dallashomos; homosexualagenda; hooklineandsphincter; movies; satire; sexpardners; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2006 9:24:31 PM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
Plans are now in the works to do a gay/bestiality version of the “Lone Ranger.”

Hollywood yearly profits are already in the toilet, and if producers thinks that queer movies will fill empty seats across the country they're living in a bubble.

Homo movies may make short term profits - until the novelty wears off. Then what?

2 posted on 01/01/2006 9:52:12 PM PST by Noachian (To control the courts the people must first control their Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

There are men here posting on Free Republic who went to see this movie and defended their actions. If watching two queer men is of interest to them and they are willing to spend their money supporting this type of film, what does that say about these people? Do some males at FR really find male with male sex appealing?


3 posted on 01/01/2006 9:53:05 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural

Hell, I hope they concentrate on sodomite films. The end of Hollywood will be quicker and more satisfying.


4 posted on 01/01/2006 10:09:53 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Good point.

Sure don't see a lot of the males here defending going to see this film as on some previous threads about this movie. I'm waiting for a male to tell me what his reasoning was about going to see this movie. Was he thrilled to see two men in love with each other? Was it a latent interest in seeing two men have sex with each other? What else could it be?

5 posted on 01/01/2006 10:24:41 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural
Somebody (can't remember who at the moment) posted something like the following a few weeks ago on another thread about Brokeback Mountain:

If a guy goes to see this movie because he wants to see it, he's gay.

If a guy goes to see this movie because his girlfriend wants to see it, he's too gay to have a girlfriend.

I laughed for five minutes...

6 posted on 01/01/2006 10:24:58 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Good point.

Sure don't see a lot of the males here defending going to see this film as on some previous threads about this movie. I'm waiting for a male to tell me what his reasoning was about going to see this movie. Was he thrilled to see two men in love with each other? Was it a latent interest in seeing two men have sex with each other? What else could it be?

7 posted on 01/01/2006 10:25:04 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
"...per screen average..."

Gotcha! PCBS detected and eliminated. Oops, that makes me sound Trekkie. I mean to say that the homosex agenda loves to hide the devil in the details. EXACTLY how many people saw this dreck of a movie?

WHAT IS 'PER SCREEN AVERAGE"? It's not about art or money, it's about desensitization. We'll all get used to this homosex stuff eventually, so sit back and enjoy this movie and then go home and kiss your five yr. old son goodnight. BTW, he's next. Thank you, Ang Lee and NAMBLA.
8 posted on 01/01/2006 10:38:53 PM PST by ishabibble (UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural

"There are men here posting on Free Republic who went to see this movie and defended their actions. If watching two queer men is of interest to them and they are willing to spend their money supporting this type of film, what does that say about these people? Do some males at FR really find male with male sex appealing?"


I haven't seen this film and don't have an opinion other my normal feelings of preferring to avoid looking at naked men..

but I also find it unreasonable when people criticize movies of books that they have not seen or read.


9 posted on 01/01/2006 11:31:31 PM PST by gondramB (If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble; John Semmens
WHAT IS 'PER SCREEN AVERAGE"?

It's the revenue divided by the number of screens. The reason the average is high is that the number of screens has been limited to large cities with large "gay" male populations. The people who want to see this movie have to go to one of the few theaters in the country showing it. That's why revenue per screen is high. Of course by showing on a few screens to packed houses, the distributors do save money on making additional prints so there is lower cost associated with that revenue. I've noticed that while promos of the homo movie were played in my home town prior to a feature film, no theater in town has booked the movie. I'm guessing they were trying to reach potential viewers who would then see it in another city.

10 posted on 01/02/2006 12:23:03 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
If you know what the movie is about, why would you need to see it before criticizing it?
11 posted on 01/02/2006 2:41:14 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Noachian
Homo movies may make short term profits - until the novelty wears off. Then what?

Define deviancy down another level and start over, of course.

12 posted on 01/02/2006 5:39:40 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim ("We're a meat-based society.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Noachian; Tijeras_Slim; John Semmens; snarks_when_bored; Supernatural; martin_fierro
Homo movies

...... such as "From Muddy Roads to Interstates" --- the story of two gay hitchhikers traveling across country......

13 posted on 01/02/2006 10:24:24 AM PST by beyond the sea (If you need a really new idea ..................... read a really old book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Well, Hollyweird is full of gays so it makes sense that they'd think this is a good idea.

Let's face it: Randolph Scott was gay, and he was one of the most famous movie cowboys ever.

And no, I haven't seen the movie nor do I plan to.

I'd have to say that anyone who knowingly goes to a movie to watch a pair of gay cowboys (or gay anybody) definitely has some unresolved issues.

Best wishes to all for a happy and successful 2006!


14 posted on 01/02/2006 10:27:55 AM PST by neverhome (If Michael Jackson eats a fruitcake... izzit cannilbalism???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
"If you know what the movie is about, why would you need to see it before criticizing it?"

This is one of those situations where I can understand if somebody else feels differently.

But personally i like to know the facts when I criticize in public or else put a disclaimer like "if media reviews are accurate."

I, personally, would not feel like I was being ethical, otherwise.

For example, consider the people who will criticize president Bush based on what they heard someone on TV say about the President without checking the President's actual remarks or policies.

or the people who show up in the Southpark threads but make clear they haven't actually watched the series...sometimes they have not even seen the actual episode they are criticizing...
15 posted on 01/02/2006 10:40:14 AM PST by gondramB (If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Of course by showing on a few screens to packed houses, the distributors do save money on making additional prints so there is lower cost associated with that revenue.

That is EXACLY what they are doing. This thing has only opened to about 300 theaters and BTW the per-screen average is dropping PRECIPITOUSLY (see http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2005/BRKMT.php).

It was a cheap enough movie that it might break even (which is really a loss, since you have to have receipts about 3X a movie's cost just to break even) since a small number of ultra-liberals (and of course gays) will watch it, but that will be it.

If "success" = "getting nominated for awards" then Bareback Mountain might score. If "success" = "making money" it will be a dismal failure.

16 posted on 01/02/2006 10:53:13 AM PST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
How's that box office for "Brokeback Mountain" doing?

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Exhibitor Relations. Final figures will be released Tuesday.

1. "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe," Buena Vista, $32.8 million.

2. "King Kong," Universal, $31.6 million.

3. "Fun With Dick and Jane," Sony, $21 million.

4. "Cheaper by the Dozen 2," Fox, $19.3 million.

5. "Rumor Has It," Warner Bros., $11.6 million.

6. "The Family Stone," Fox, $10.2 million.

7. "Memoirs of a Geisha," Sony, $10 million.

8. "The Ringer," Fox Searchlight, $8 million.

9. "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire," Warner Bros., $7.5 million.

10. "Munich," Universal, $6.1 million.

"Brokeback Mountain" isn't in the top 10; I guess it must be bringing up the rear...

17 posted on 01/02/2006 11:49:53 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

bump with no comment.


18 posted on 01/02/2006 11:53:32 AM PST by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Do I have to view porn before I can criticize it? And I've never watched South Park but I know they make fun of religion. Should I not criticize until I've watched a particular episode demeaning the Virgin Mary?


19 posted on 01/02/2006 12:33:00 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens; peacebaby
I've found the Theme song from Brokeback Mountain...

Sung to Manilow's "Copa Cabana"

His name was Ennis
He was a Shepard
With cowboy hat and assless chaps
He should have kept it under wraps
He would merengue and do the cha-cha
And when he'd drink and fall asleep
Jack Twist tended to the sheep
Across the mountain heights
They worked the summer nights
They were young and they had each other
And had rough sex fights

Up at Brokeback, Brokeback Mountain
Those gay cowboys, they did some mounting
Up at Brokeback, Brokeback Mountain
They felt the passion as they discussed fashion
Up at Brokeback

.... they fell in love
Brokeback, Brokeback Mountain

He was the boss man
He did some firing
When he went to the mountain top
And he saw Ennis getting bopped
And when they finished, he fired them pronto
Later Jack went a bit too far
Gay bashers saw him at a bar
And then the punches flew and chairs were smashed in two
There was blood and a single gun shot
But just who shot who?

Up at Brokeback, Brokeback Mountain
Those gay cowboys, they did some mounting
Up at Brokeback, Brokeback Mountain
They felt the passion as they discussed fashion
Up at Brokeback

.... he lost his love

His name was Ennis, he was a shepherd
But that was a long time ago, when closets hid more than clothes
Now gays have pride days, but not our Ennis
Still in the chaps he used to wear, faded feathers in his hair
He sits there so refined, and drinks himself half-blind
He lost his Jack and he lost his family
Taking it from behind!

Up at Brokeback, Brokeback Mountain
Those gay cowboys, they did some mounting
Up at Brokeback, Brokeback Mountain
They felt the passion as they discussed fashion
Up at Brokeback

.... don't fall in love
Don't fall in love

20 posted on 01/02/2006 1:25:26 PM PST by Snardius (Some women want to walk hand in hand through the park; sing them a song; bite them on the spine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson