Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Divorce Papers, via PlainsRadio.com - updating as it goes
Investigating Obama ^ | 12/2/2009 | Arlen Williams

Posted on 01/02/2009 1:36:47 PM PST by unspun

The Barack Hussein Obama Sr. / Stanley Ann divorce papers are in the posstion of Ed Hale and PlainsRadio.com. I.O. will likely be making numerous updates in this posting, as the afternoon and evening proceed.

2:25pm CT - Ed Hale has his FedEx package and has made sure that among others, attorney, Stephen Pidgeon is getting a copy. PlainsRadio.com is to post it for public view at 8pm CT, tonight. Ed and others will be 'net audio-wise, too, as previously mentioned.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: certifigate; obamadivorcedecree; obamatruthfile; plainsradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last
Updates will continue on Investigating Obama and I'll be looking in, here. Also an eye on PlainsRadio and their busy chat room.

Not taking a shower (but I have eaten cheese).

1 posted on 01/02/2009 1:36:48 PM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BonRad; STARWISE; LucyT; MHGinTN; BP2; Frantzie; CaribouCrossing; DouglasKC; Cicero; All; ...

Here we go....


2 posted on 01/02/2009 1:37:47 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Why would they have divorced if the marriage was never legal due to the fact that he was married to someone else in Kenya?


3 posted on 01/02/2009 1:39:44 PM PST by COUNTrecount (http://obamaclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Copy of front page here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2157797/posts


4 posted on 01/02/2009 1:41:03 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

His marriage in Africa is believed to be a “tribal/jump over the broom” wedding and was not offically registered. OTOH he had three wives....It’s a religious thing!


5 posted on 01/02/2009 1:42:41 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun
I don;t know why you would get worked up for this. I don't think divorce papers show where the child is born. Obama has stated or factcheck.org has that he has dual citizenship at birth.
6 posted on 01/02/2009 1:42:46 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Ping when real.

7 posted on 01/02/2009 1:43:44 PM PST by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jarofants

LOLOL!

Been here long?


8 posted on 01/02/2009 1:44:26 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Copy of front page here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2157797/posts

Okay, I will be posting there from now on -- probably. Feel free to check in at I.O.

9 posted on 01/02/2009 1:46:40 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jarofants
I don;t know why you would get worked up for this. I don't think divorce papers show where the child is born. Obama has stated or factcheck.org has that he has dual citizenship at birth.

Right, he is not n.b.C., but whatever additional evidence might be gained, or light shed is good.

10 posted on 01/02/2009 1:47:51 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Yeah 55 years


11 posted on 01/02/2009 1:50:36 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: unspun

WOW!!!

And this proves what?


12 posted on 01/02/2009 1:53:19 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unspun

13 posted on 01/02/2009 1:58:36 PM PST by OL Hickory (Where is the America I knew as a boy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jarofants
Obama has stated or factcheck.org has that he has dual citizenship at birth.

If you take Zero at his word, you may as well have been born yesterday.

14 posted on 01/02/2009 2:02:09 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unspun

bfltr w/ popcorn ready


15 posted on 01/02/2009 2:02:55 PM PST by mnehring (Happy Holy-Days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jarofants

I think I misunderstood your post.

I apologize.


16 posted on 01/02/2009 2:04:01 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unspun
This does answer one of my concerns. If his mother wasn't married to BHO, then that at least nails down one BCert item. Was his name BHO at birth or was he born as Barry Dunham? Was his name formally changed when she married Soreto to Barry? When did he change his name to Barack and why? If they were really leagaly married, he most likely was named Barry or Barack Obama.

I've been concerned he was one of those Casius Clay types that changed his name in honor of Malcom X or something. He has no past at Oxydental, or Harvard. Was his name Barry upon enrollment and Barack upon graduation? Who knows? Maybe he is the student formerly known as &%, but I think he's much older than Prince. I keep asking myself, if this is true, why would a Christian change their name to a Muslim name?

17 posted on 01/02/2009 2:08:15 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Don’t you read anything before replying to something.


18 posted on 01/02/2009 2:31:29 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: unspun

bookmark


19 posted on 01/02/2009 2:32:57 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jarofants
And this proves what?

I will post the answer to that question in I.O. and as I gain, Stephen Pidgeon will address it, come 8pm.

20 posted on 01/02/2009 2:34:33 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jarofants; unspun
Don’t you read anything before replying to something.

Yes.

I was reacting to your post.

You said you couldn't understand why Unspun, or by extension, any one else would “get worked up for this”.

You said you don't think the divorce papers show where the child was born. I beg to differ.

The part I misread was about what Zero had stated about his dual citizenship at the time of birth.

OTOH, he hasn't provided anyone with a decent paperwork trail so who knows what's true.

Point is that your post struck me as trollish.

So, prove me wrong....

21 posted on 01/02/2009 2:54:26 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: unspun

If this reveals Zero’s country of birth, it will be the straw that broke the camel’s back.

I hope.


22 posted on 01/02/2009 2:55:09 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

5:02pm CT - While, as stated, I will not yet divulge whether or not the divorce decree refers to the citizenship of Barack Obama (a.k.a., “The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers,” as FReeper, Rodney Dangerfield has named him) I will say that this document is significant and do suggest listening to Plains Radio, tonight.

http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/


23 posted on 01/02/2009 3:20:22 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: unspun

The papers are posted at plainsradio.com!
Only One Child Listed, “Maya” on page 5! No mention of Barry.
What does this mean?

http://www.plainsradio.com/Home/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf


24 posted on 01/02/2009 3:21:55 PM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Correction, Pg 4

View all pages here! http://www.plainsradio.com/Home/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf


25 posted on 01/02/2009 3:24:55 PM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt
Why does anybody want to see Soetoro divorce papers. The divorce papers thats supposed to be so important are the Obama and Dunham papers.
26 posted on 01/02/2009 3:32:42 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jarofants

Note paragraph 3 on page 1, which states that the parties (Dunham and Sotero/sp?) have 2 children, one minor child and one not a minor (I infer Barack who would have been around 19 at the time of this document) who relies on the parties for support. If Lolo was responsible for support along with Ann, does this imply Barack had been adopted?


27 posted on 01/02/2009 3:38:15 PM PST by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Nice try ... the divorce in question is the one between Obama, SR and Stanley Ann. Try again ...


28 posted on 01/02/2009 3:38:37 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

See the above ... is this the immediate Axelrod talking point directive, seek to create confusion reagrding the divorce by referring tot eh Soetoro divorce knowing the threads are about the Obama divorce?


29 posted on 01/02/2009 3:40:13 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Kevmo; unspun

Notice posts 24, 25, 26, and 27 ... this is misdirection on an organized scale!


30 posted on 01/02/2009 3:42:01 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

My friend, if you note my posting history, I am not one who has ever done anything to support Obama in any way. I just asked a question.


31 posted on 01/02/2009 3:44:34 PM PST by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

I was hoping you weren’t being misdirected. Great!


32 posted on 01/02/2009 3:48:25 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jarofants

“I don;t know why you would get worked up for this. “

We have some very good straw graspers on here.


33 posted on 01/02/2009 3:57:03 PM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

You O-bots won’t be able to do much damage control here.

The Cree is acquired and secured.

The California Supreme court requested a copy earlier, but no one could get it in time.

The Supreme Court will surely get a copy.

Whether it makes any difference remains to be seen.


34 posted on 01/02/2009 3:59:31 PM PST by jetxnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt
Frankly, there's really nothing new here with that particular document.

DecaLogosIntl.org reported back on Friday, December 18, 2008 on this already (here's my post):

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2043

I really don't see anything different between what was reported then and this PDF now. Maybe someone sees a difference?

-Phil

35 posted on 01/02/2009 5:14:07 PM PST by Phil_GA (http://www.therightsideoflife.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Maya was the only minor in 1980, Barak was already 18. Earlier in the document it is mentioned that there is one minor and one of age.


36 posted on 01/02/2009 6:02:56 PM PST by bioqubit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

You O-bots won’t be able to do much damage control here.”

LOL. Yes clearly its buy into a conspiracy theory or support Obama. There are no other ways. If there was any proof or smoking gun on this the Hilary camp would have used that to destroy Obama and they’d have used her elements in the media (some awfully big organizations endorsed her) to help do it. McCain would have made it an issue too to forestall defeat were it as open and shut as you’ve fooled yourself into believing. I understand why you are choosing to cling onto this tiny hope and wish there was something to it but its all for naught.


37 posted on 01/02/2009 6:23:36 PM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I sorta gave up quickly on the Obama divorce stuff when the games started getting played like the API stuff. I’ve been pinged to a couple of the threads but I still do not have confidence. The hype/information ratio is very high.


38 posted on 01/02/2009 7:10:36 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Yup, not a rabbit to chase at this point.


39 posted on 01/02/2009 7:16:00 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; LucyT; STARWISE; BonRad; BP2; All

FReepers, if you want a synopsis, just come on over and take a look.

http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/


40 posted on 01/02/2009 7:37:54 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

http://www.plainsradio.com/obama1.html


41 posted on 01/02/2009 8:33:17 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: unspun

bump


42 posted on 01/02/2009 8:34:39 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Thanks for the link. Duly read and filed. ... And much ado about nothing it would appear.


43 posted on 01/02/2009 8:46:59 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: DemonDeac

LOL. Yes clearly its buy into a conspiracy theory or support Obama.
***Why not just stay the heck out of the way? If you find yourself hindering activist conservatives, you have to ask yourself eventually if that is your purpose. And if you continue to act that way you’ll be steamrolled to make way for real conservatives. Doesn’t it bother you that the comrades you find on either side of you are obamanoids?


45 posted on 01/02/2009 8:59:16 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Brutus509

Hey Brutus! Have you come to praise or to bury? I don’t need either from ya.

God loves you and so do I.


46 posted on 01/02/2009 10:38:03 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Brutus509; MHGinTN; LucyT; STARWISE
When you have prove of Barry’s place of birth, post it here. Until then shut up!

Why, welcome to FreeRepublic.

Brutus, I could tell you how I know that this divorce record helped, but I harldy trust you, now do I. Keep advertising yourself in FR, though.

48 posted on 01/03/2009 11:42:51 AM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Brutus509

IBTZ


49 posted on 01/03/2009 11:51:08 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave (Illegitimi non carborundum - "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Brutus509

You’re funny ... ROFL.


50 posted on 01/03/2009 11:56:49 AM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson