Posted on 01/19/2009 3:08:12 PM PST by Sorry screen name in use
A new action filed by Orly Taitz, ESQ based on the Executive Order by President Bush for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Santa Ana Division
Alan Keyes, PhD., Wiley S. Drake, and Markham Robinson,
Plaintiffs
v.
Barack H. Obama, a/k/a Barack H. Obama, II a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro; Condoleeza Rice, in her capacity as Secretary of State; Robert Mueller, in his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Michael W. Hager, in his capacity as Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management; and DOES 1-100 Defendants.
(Excerpt) Read more at drorly.blogspot.com ...
That is one of the reason’s Orly issued this action. To compel her to do that.
bookmark
well, with this and actually he has taken office, we do have a fraud crime on our hands.
bttt
Jargon as a means of maintaining cloistered power. It's been done in religion and information technology, too. (And I took Latin in H.S.) Whoever wrote this executive order should have the definition and etymology of the word, "reciprocal" stapled to his forehead in reverse, so he can read it in the mirror.
Is this why Hillary wanted to be Sec. of State,so she could sooner or later certify obama’s BC through his passport? Can she decertify his passport, expose who he really is,and get him kicked out of office??”
Do you really think Clinton would make a power play like that?
Assuming that the proof already is documented under seal, then I don’t think the SC would let it come to that.
Yes, I have seen the video. Freepers, please view it!
Starwise, following the video it states there is a part two. I could not find it. Have you seen part two? Please ping me to the link if you have. Thanks!
Do you think HildaBeast had info about this being in the works??? Interesting thoughts on the matter regardless.
I wish you were correct but I haven’t heard anything...
George Bush is no longer President.
And Obama has not been sworn in!
This must mean something!
/sarcasm
I didn't get a Social Security number until I was 16, when I needed one to get a job. It's only been in recent years that the IRS has forced partents to get their babies social security cards.
“Sec. 8. Effective Date and Applicability. This order is effective upon issuance and is applicable to individuals newly appointed to excepted service positions or hired as contractor employees beginning 90 days from the effective date of this order.”
As much as I hate it, this section looks like it would exclude BO ... or am I reading it incorrectly?
You are absolutely correct. See his post #69. He has no idea what he is talking about, makes a lot of assumptions about me, and others, makes a lot of assumptions about anyone who wants to know the truth, i guess, on any subject, and he is willing to submit to someone, anyone who seems to be in a higher position.
It was because tax cheats were adding bogus dependents to their tax returns so the IRS then required a SS # for every dependent claimed.
"(d) This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees or agents, or any other person."
These Obama non-citizenship cases started before he was sworn in. That will have alot of impact on having him removed from office shortly.
Excellent points.
I’ve always been a very pro ‘say what you mean’ type of person.
I guess that makes sense. Not having any children, I never had to deal with any of that and don't know when they started that whole deal.
What I don't like is that children of welfare recipients get a monthly SS check from birth til they're 18.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.