Posted on 01/19/2009 3:08:12 PM PST by Sorry screen name in use
A new action filed by Orly Taitz, ESQ based on the Executive Order by President Bush for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Santa Ana Division
Alan Keyes, PhD., Wiley S. Drake, and Markham Robinson,
Plaintiffs
v.
Barack H. Obama, a/k/a Barack H. Obama, II a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro; Condoleeza Rice, in her capacity as Secretary of State; Robert Mueller, in his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Michael W. Hager, in his capacity as Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management; and DOES 1-100 Defendants.
(Excerpt) Read more at drorly.blogspot.com ...
“When will these embarrassing Birth Certificate Truthers STFU?”
Guess you don’t know it all, afterall. If you are embarrassed by those who want to make sure that our next President is in fact eligible to hold that office and who want to make sure that our Constitution is upheld, then perhaps you don’t understand the situation or are one of those who simply don’t care anymore.
Obama could have proven his eligibility a long time ago but has chosen to fight them every step of the way by hiding his b.c. and other records. I would suggest that your outrage is misplaced. You should be angry at Barack Obama.
“Yes indeed. Berg and Taitz appear to be making strides.
There is some sort of SCOTUS disposition potentially on January 21 in Berg vs. Obama. Im trying to learn more info on what is happening here.”
Please ping me when you find out more about it. Where did you see it listed on the SCOTUS site?
I believe the orders from this past Friday 1/16 will be posted tomorrow, but not sure. They were not posted today due to the holiday. And perhaps with the big bad event on for tomorrow, the orders may not be posted until Wednesday!
See post 32 for executive order
dirtymac, you must realize that MR KNOW IT ALL, is some snot nose kid fresh out of college that does not know his A$$ from a hole in the ground.
Thank you; and the more explanations, the better. I just cannot grasp legelese or governmentese. Never will.
Thanks LucyT, and g’night all.
Thanks for the ping Lucy! I am really curious as to what this means.
I have been studying this EO over the past day and it strikes me as an order to be more efficient in checking out Government Officials.
That’s how it strikes me anyway. I was hoping some legal scholars would take the ball and run with it. Dr. Orly along with Alan Keyes have become my new heroes. Who would have thought!
I really like this one statement in the executive order....
(b) Exceptions to Reciprocal Recognition. A gaining agency is not required to grant reciprocal recognition to a prior favorable fitness or suitability determination when:
(i) the new position requires a higher level of investigation than previously conducted for that individual;
.
Yeah, this time it's for real!!!
LOL!
I thought bo was going to become POTUS tomorrow? Now let’s see...Gates is both the old and new Sec. of D and also designated Head of State on bo’s inauguration day...Hillary is designated Sec. of S but she has not been confirmed...and Orly filed suit against Condi Rice to compel her to produce bo’s passport records...Now why is all this happening hours before bo’s inauguration?
Thank you.
And who is “Sorry screen name in use” and why is SSNIU posting all this cryptic info on the eve of this Historic Day?
bookmark
As soon as Hussein stops hiding his birth certificate and proves he’s eligible.
I believe the info that you are inquirying about is provided at this link:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2839
For people who weren’t sold before on him NOT being eligible, all this legal blocking ought to raise some red flags.
I’m telling you, you don’t fight something to the Supreme Court of the United States of America just because you don’t ‘wanna’.
Orly and Berg are relentless. She is a gem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.