Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Son's Textbook "Screws" Ronald Reagan and John Paul II
The Lid ^ | 3/11/2010 | The Lid

Posted on 03/11/2010 11:00:57 AM PST by Shellybenoit

I have spent much time during the past few evenings helping my son study for his History test later in the week. As I worked with him through his studies, I found that his class is presenting a new version of History, a version that never occurred. And while you can make a case for different interpretations of events that happened centuries ago, his text book and curriculum distorts events that I saw with my own eyes.

The Book in question is published by McDougal Littell and is called World History Patterns of Interaction. The test covers much of the period from the end of WWII through the 1980's. It sets up the Cold War period with the mistaken explanation that both sides were aggressors. On page 983 it says "both sides believed that they needed to stop the other side from extending its power, rather than a what it was, a battle between the Soviet side wanting to expand its communist philosophy across the world and the west trying to prevent the takeover."

(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: History; Politics
KEYWORDS: coldwar; godsgravesglyphs; history; indoctrination; popejohnpaulii; reagan; textbooks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2010 11:00:57 AM PST by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LS

Ping


2 posted on 03/11/2010 11:02:35 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

what else is new? This is why children shouldn’t be taught history out of textbooks. The internet is a far better teacher about history than the classroom.


3 posted on 03/11/2010 11:03:48 AM PST by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

You cannot expect anything else in our “socialist public school system”.....


4 posted on 03/11/2010 11:05:37 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
Liberals are showing to all the world why government should have no place in education.
5 posted on 03/11/2010 11:05:57 AM PST by highlander_UW (Obama has lost or not saved over 4 million jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

From the Public Indoctrination Centers formally called public schools ...


6 posted on 03/11/2010 11:06:18 AM PST by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

John Paul II did some very good things, but he also did things that forever tarnished not only himself, but all of Catholicism.

Quietly forgetting him is the kindest thing that can be done for him.


7 posted on 03/11/2010 11:06:35 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Publishing houses choose their employees from universities and education factories, so why expect something different. IIRC, a California textbook at one time taught that Muslims were here before Columbus. There are mandated, week-long practices in various school districts across the country that have students ‘practice’ Islam, say prayers, study Islam, etc., in which students recite the Shahada every day.


8 posted on 03/11/2010 11:07:24 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Public schools are indoctrination facilities. Send a child there at your own risk. You want a kid to learn the truth, it won’t happen at a government run school.


9 posted on 03/11/2010 11:07:53 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
From the link we have:

On page 983 it says "both sides believed that they needed to stop the other side from extending its power, rather than a what it was, a battle between the Soviet side wanting to expand its communist philosophy across the world and the west trying to prevent the takeover."

Am I missing something here? I have no issue with that quote, which if I read the article correctly is supoposed to be an example of the published misinformation (other examples later in the article are better).

10 posted on 03/11/2010 11:09:40 AM PST by Michael.SF. (At least Hitler got the Olympics for Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Interesting that there are no authors listed for that book on the book. It was written by mystery people.


11 posted on 03/11/2010 11:13:08 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

He is not called John Paul the Great for nothing. Changed the course of history. No amount of anticatholic propaganda will ever change that.


12 posted on 03/11/2010 11:13:14 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Found the authors: ROGER B. BECK is Professor of African and World History at Eastern Illinois University; Linda Black is a student of “gender and world history,” at Texas A&M and Larry S. Krieger is “a published author of young adult books.” So, two writers with a PC axe to grind, and an author of books for children.


13 posted on 03/11/2010 11:19:48 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
but he also did things that forever tarnished not only himself, but all of Catholicism.

Nice innuendo there without source. IMO, it is very likely that the Catholic Church will eventually beatify Pope John Paul II as a Saint of the Church and formally as John Paul II the Great! (which he's already known as among 'serious' Catholics).

You are correct though, you may be kind and quietly forget him. Catholics would appreciate that.

14 posted on 03/11/2010 11:20:42 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
It sets up the Cold War period with the mistaken explanation that both sides were aggressors. On page 983 it says "both sides believed that they needed to stop the other side from extending its power, rather than a what it was, a battle between the Soviet side wanting to expand its communist philosophy across the world and the west trying to prevent the takeover."

The operative phrase here is both sides believed and I find nothing wrong with that description. This article is without merit, whatever shortcomings the book has.

15 posted on 03/11/2010 11:21:32 AM PST by Misterioso (To deal with men by force is as impractical as to deal with nature by persuasion. -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
Lesson here is for you as a parent to teach them at home what they will not be getting at school. I do after-schooling with my second grader.

A great non-politically corrected series of teaching books are: “What Your Second Grader Needs to Know: Fundamentals of a Good Second Grade Education”

And the writer has one for each grade.

http://www.amazon.com/What-Your-Second-Grader-Needs/dp/038531843X

16 posted on 03/11/2010 11:21:52 AM PST by NavyCanDo (Palin in 2012 will see the Potomac from her House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
You cannot expect anything else in our “socialist public school system”....

Yep, flee Government Schools! As fast as you can! Do not subject your children to this brainwashing.

17 posted on 03/11/2010 11:22:01 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; NYer

Ping


18 posted on 03/11/2010 11:22:24 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
On page 983 it says "both sides believed that they needed to stop the other side from extending its power, rather than a what it was, a battle between the Soviet side wanting to expand its communist philosophy across the world and the west trying to prevent the takeover."

What is wrong with the above?

19 posted on 03/11/2010 11:23:10 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

GMTA!


20 posted on 03/11/2010 11:23:19 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson