Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

C3PO: “Etiquette and Protocol Robot”
The Virginian ^ | 6/19/2010 | Moneyrunner

Posted on 06/19/2010 7:27:41 AM PDT by moneyrunner

A great deal of the internet is populated by C2PO wanna bees. If you ever watched a Star Wars movie (and who hasn’t) you know the shiny gold robot named C3PO whose purpose is “etiquette and protocol.” The internet has developed its own system of etiquette and protocol. One of these is an abhorrence of what is referred to as “link whoring” which is defined as encouraging people to click on your website. According to this protocol the internet virgin is supposed to sit demurely on the sidelines, knees tightly together, until she is spotted by a search engine like Google.

This phenomenon was one I recently experienced at one of my favorite sites, FreeRepublic.

(Excerpt) Read more at moneyrunner.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; bundleofsticks; freerepublic; googlewantsyouto; protocol; supportfrnotgoogle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-188 next last

1 posted on 06/19/2010 7:27:41 AM PDT by moneyrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

Out of curiosity has anyone ever looked into the c3PO name? I am not sure Carbon3 and Polonium have/can be joined, but with all the Star Wars geeks out there, surely someone has theorized it?


2 posted on 06/19/2010 7:33:06 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (3(0|\|0/\/\1($ 101: (4P174L1$/\/\ R3QU1r3$ (4P174L. Could it be any more simple?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

I have an idea what a C3PO is. I am puzzled about the C2PO referred to in the first line. Is that someone not quite up to C3PO standards? Perhaps an earlier model?


3 posted on 06/19/2010 7:34:46 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

You are correct. C3PO was smarter.


4 posted on 06/19/2010 7:36:55 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

You mean mentally unstable people with a fixation on someone named Pablo?


5 posted on 06/19/2010 7:40:39 AM PDT by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

“(Excerpt) Read more at moneyrunner.blogspot.com ...”

Why excerpt from your blog?

It isn’t on the list of sources that must be excerpted:

abqjournal.com
adn.com
afp.com
aim.org
atimes.com
associatedcontent.com
awsj.com
baltimoresun.com
barrons.com
barronsmag.com
bayarea.com
bendbulletin.com
boston.com (www.boston.com The Boston Globe)
boxofficemojo.com
bsudailynews.com
businessweek.com
californian.com
canadafreepress.com
Capetimes.co.za
careerjournal.com
cavalierdaily.com
chicagotribune.com
chron.com
cnn.com
collegejournal.com
crainsnewyork.com
csmonitor.com
ctnow.com
daily-chronicle.com
dailypress.com
dallasnews.com
dj.com
dowjonesnews.com
djnewswires.com
dowjones.com
feer.com (Far Eastern Economic Review)
fresnobee.com
foxnews.com
gallup.com
The Guardian (UK)
gazette.net
GCN.com
goerie.com
greenwichtime.com
gwpi.net
heraldnet.com
holahoy.com
ibdeditorials.com
idahostatesman.com
iht.com
investors.com
jacksonville.com (Florida-Times Union)
janes.com
jewishobserver-la.com
jewishworldreview.com
kansascity.com
laopinion.com
latimes.com
livemint.com
marketwatch.com
mcall.com
mercextra.com
mercurynews.com
modbee.com
msn.com
msnbc.com
nasdaq.com
nationalweekly.com
nctimes.com
newhavenregister.com
news.com.au
newsday.com
newsweek.com
nhregister.com
nj.com
nola.com
nynewsday.com
nypost.com
nypostonline.com
nysun.com
nytimes.com
ocregister.com
opinionjournal.com
oregonmag.com
orlandosentinel.com
pcworld.com
pnj.com
post-dispatch.com
post-gazette.com
postwritersgroup.com
readexpress.com
realclearpolitics.com
realestatejournal.com
rockymountainnews.com
sacbee.com
sacunion.com
seattletimes.nwsource.com
sfgate.com
sitepoint.com
sjmercury.com
spectator.org
spokesman-recorder.com
sportsillustrated.com
sportsillustrated.cnn.com
si.com
stamfordadvocate.com
startribune.com
startupjournal.com
statesmanjournal.com
sun-sentinel.com
sunspot.net
theatlantic.com
thewbalchannel.com
time.com
timesdispatch.com
toledoblade.com
tribune.com
tribune-review.com
trivalleyherald.com
todaysthv.com
victorhanson.com
washingtondispatch.com
washingtonpost.com
washingtontechnology.com
washingtontimes.com
washtimes.com
washpostco.com
wnd.com
worldnetdaily.com
worldpress.org
wral.com
wsj.com
wsjbooks.com
wsjclassroomedition.com

Or are you simply trolling for blog hits?

Otherwise, nice thread.


6 posted on 06/19/2010 7:48:27 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Did you read my post? The answer is right there.


7 posted on 06/19/2010 7:54:06 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Just and FYI. I have been around for a long time and appreciate all you do. Just a few thought based on some people who have been stalking me.
8 posted on 06/19/2010 7:57:00 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

I read the part you posted HERE.
You mean to divert traffic from FR and force people offsite to read the whole content?

WHY?


9 posted on 06/19/2010 7:57:03 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; moneyrunner
WHY?

You dawg. Pimpin Ain't Easy!

10 posted on 06/19/2010 8:02:25 AM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
Did you read my post?

I skimmed the excerpt as there is no way I will visit a blog pimps site any more than I will visit a disease infested whorehouse.

No thanks. If I like the story I will visit the link but I will not visit it if forced to.

It is a slap in Jim Rob’s face to drive traffic from his site to yours and simply because he allows it doesn’t make it right. Walmart doesn’t pursue small time shoplifters because it is economically unfeasible but that doesn’t make it OK to be a thieving piece of crap.

It is disappointing to see a long time member who only pimps his blog no different than the n00bies who don’t care about FR.

Rest assured I will never visit your blog.

11 posted on 06/19/2010 8:02:27 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
“Forcing people off site?” What kind of a browser are you using? And how am I diverting traffic from FR? I'm adding to traffic. Not that Jim Robinson needs it, he's got lots of it, as my comments show. But if you don't want to go there, don't. Maybe your buddy will go my site, copy and paste, and put it here. I wish he would. It's a good comment. But I'm not going to take up Jim's bandwidth to do it.

Regards.

12 posted on 06/19/2010 8:04:17 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
You mean mentally unstable people with a fixation on someone named Pablo?

Yes, among others. He has friends. You can make multiple copies of C3PO. There is C1PO, C2PO and C4PO.

13 posted on 06/19/2010 8:07:13 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Rest assured I will never visit your blog.

Thank you.

But I don't really want to know about the kind of whorehouses you visit. That's too much information.

Regards

14 posted on 06/19/2010 8:11:29 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: moneyrunner

If you are able to post the full write-up here, why just post an excerpt? If you want to share your thoughts with folks why not do that here in full, then post a link back to your site as an archive for those that want to find out more about your thoughts on other matters. As it is, you are using this site and this thread as a lure to your site. To me that does seem a little like “link whoring”. I think that if others found your writing interesting enough they would appreciate a full write-up and want to seek out more.


16 posted on 06/19/2010 8:15:39 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

17 posted on 06/19/2010 8:17:24 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

C3PO was the gay version of C2PO.


18 posted on 06/19/2010 8:18:55 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Republicans should campaign like Rush Limbaugh. A lot more of them would get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
Did you read my post? The answer is right there.

So you consider yourself a "link whore" or "blog pimp".

The link is fine. Any one who wants to see more of your writing then has a easy way.

But why force the readership of FR to go to blog unless your intent is to divert traffic?

19 posted on 06/19/2010 8:23:44 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl
Why would a fatherless child, a slave and a son of a slave, choose to make an effeminate etiquette and protocol robot?

It was in the script...

20 posted on 06/19/2010 8:26:38 AM PDT by FDNYRHEROES (In just His first 3 days, the War on Terror became the War on Free Speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
But I don't really want to know about the kind of whorehouses you visit.

I sure hope that you have some kind of skills because reading comprehension is not counted among them. Kind of funny that you fancy yourself a writer and you appear to read on a inner city gangbanger level. Your sense of right and wrong seem to be on the same level.

I guess if all you can do is flog your POS blog on a successful discussion forum then you are pretty pathetic.

21 posted on 06/19/2010 8:31:54 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

22 posted on 06/19/2010 8:36:11 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FDNYRHEROES
"Why would a fatherless child, a slave and a son of a slave, choose to make an effeminate etiquette and protocol robot?

It was in the script..."

Now I'm not defending George Lucas, but it is possible that after the kid went to Jedi U, the droid was re-programmed for different purposes by the next owner.

23 posted on 06/19/2010 8:37:00 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Y'all say pimp?


24 posted on 06/19/2010 8:40:03 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: King Moonracer
I call your pimp and raise you a flashing pimp!



25 posted on 06/19/2010 8:42:30 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: thackney
"But why force the readership of FR to go to blog unless your intent is to divert traffic?"

Two reasons I can think of. One: he has a right to his Copyright just like any other writer.

Two: Free Republic doesn't allow certain types of content to be shown mostly video. So to see this content one must leave FR or NOT see it at all.

Oh and I don't think he has forced anyone to go anywhere to read his blog. One can choose not to click the link. You are free not to read it.

26 posted on 06/19/2010 8:44:08 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

I knew when I posted that I was way outclassed. Bravo!!!!


27 posted on 06/19/2010 8:45:54 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: King Moonracer
I didn't even have to post the King-o-Pimps!



28 posted on 06/19/2010 8:48:46 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
One of these is an abhorrence of what is referred to as “link whoring” which is defined as encouraging people to click on your website.

This phenomenon was one I recently experienced at one of my favorite sites, FreeRepublic.

(Excerpt) Read more at moneyrunner.blogspot.com ...

LOL. If that was intentional, well done. If not, oh bitter irony...

29 posted on 06/19/2010 8:53:26 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; thackney
One: he has a right to his Copyright just like any other writer.

Simply because you wrote something doesn't mean you have taken the legal measures to copyright it. According to fair use you don't own the words no matter how you string them together.

Two: Free Republic doesn't allow certain types of content to be shown mostly video. So to see this content one must leave FR or NOT see it at all.

FR typically doesn't allow porn, racist or excessively violent videos. If that is what he has on his blog then he shouldn't be flogging it here.

If you are condoning blog pimping then you are the type of person who says nothing about petty theft because "it was just a magazine".

30 posted on 06/19/2010 8:54:49 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
If you want to share your thoughts with folks why not do that here in full, then post a link back to your site as an archive for those that want to find out more about your thoughts on other matters.

Of course I want to share my thoughts with people. That’s why this site exists, that’s why you contribute by posting. It’s pretty much why everyone who is not lurking is here. I share my thoughts more fully on my website so that’s why I link. And because I don’t want to waste Jim’s valuable electrons AND because I want to get people to my website, I excerpt. Sort of the same reason the LA Times and the Washington Post sued Jim.

Finally, if people don’t think my excerpt is interesting, they won’t click on the link. Just like I don’t click on every link at FR, Instapundit or DRUDGE. Which, by the way, are full of excerpts with links to the full article.

What I find puzzling is the insistence that I post in full but other, bigger bloggers can be linked to. Here is part of my little essay that explains my postion.

I find it ironic that FreeRepublic , which started at a time when the alternative media was in its infancy, should now be the home of people who are trying to enforce a protocol that actually stifles the alternatives that are springing up around the internet. It should be encouraging them.

31 posted on 06/19/2010 8:57:30 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thackney
But why force the readership of FR to go to blog unless your intent is to divert traffic?

I really don't understand this suggestion that I am "diverting traffic." What is that all about? When I go to FR and see something that I want to read in full, I click on the link that opens another tab (I use Windows XP and Internet Explorer), look at it and am back to FR with the click of a mouse. I can have FR, Malkin, Drudge, Instapundit, ACE, IAMO, Etc. up all at once. How in the world do you divert traffic in the internet today? Put up a bunch of orange cones with a sign saying “do not enter?”

I honestly do not understand your point.

Regards.

32 posted on 06/19/2010 9:05:14 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

And, again, we are tricked into visiting someone’s personal web page, blog, etc.......


33 posted on 06/19/2010 9:06:59 AM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
What I find puzzling is the insistence that I post in full but other, bigger bloggers can be linked to.

There is no "can" or "can't".

These "bigger bloggers" aren't posting here.

If they were, they would get spanked for needless excerpting too.

Little weenie bloggers pimping their own blogs are the problem.

If getting content seen was your goal, you would post it here.
Don't feed me that crap about saving FR's electrons either.

34 posted on 06/19/2010 9:08:13 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Go ahead, click on the link. You know you want to. You know you want to know what I said about you. Go ahead. No one will know what your do in the privacy of your own basement. Go on, just one little click.

Just …. One …. Little … Click.

Then I gotcha and you’ll be hooked.

Oh no! ……. I warned you!


35 posted on 06/19/2010 9:12:40 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer; moneyrunner
Looks like moneyrunner ain't getting the support he thought his whiny little cry for pity would generate.

moneyrunner, why don't you go away and we will let you know if we miss you?

36 posted on 06/19/2010 9:13:18 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
And, again, we are tricked into visiting someone’s personal web page, blog, etc.......

Just for my information, what's "personal" about my blog? I mean in ways that Instapundit isn't? Do I talk about myself a lot? Tell you about my day? What color is my hair?

37 posted on 06/19/2010 9:16:47 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

You are one seriously deluded little monkey boy.

I said I wouldn’t click on your POS blog and I won’t.

Unlike you I have integrity.

Plus as a writer you are seriously lacking as is apparent from your excerpt. Comparing your self to successful people doesn’t make you one of them. It just makes you a peeping tom looking in the window of the party to which you will never be invited or welcome.


38 posted on 06/19/2010 9:17:07 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Eaker, my friend. Think of this as the last line in the movie Casablanca.
39 posted on 06/19/2010 9:19:24 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Eaker,

Your response made me laugh.

Regards

40 posted on 06/19/2010 9:21:06 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner

LOL!

Now you are stealing from movies!

What a putz.


41 posted on 06/19/2010 9:21:15 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Thanks for keeping the thread going. Your check’s in the mail.

Regards


42 posted on 06/19/2010 9:24:25 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
......what's "personal" about my blog?........

That is just too easy..

43 posted on 06/19/2010 9:24:55 AM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
"Simply because you wrote something doesn't mean you have taken the legal measures to copyright it."

Well I can see why you have a problem understanding excerpting. You have no clue how copyright works at all:

Understanding Rights and Copyright

by Moira Allen
Two of the most common questions I hear are "How do I copyright my work?" and "How do I prevent editors from stealing my ideas?"

Copyrighting your work is probably the easiest part of writing, because your work is automatically protected the moment you write it down. You do not have to "register" a copyright for it to be valid.

If you're nervous, you can place a copyright notice on your material by putting the following information in the upper right corner of your document:

Copyright © 200X by (your name)

Click Herefor rest of article.

"FR typically doesn't allow porn, racist or excessively violent videos. If that is what he has on his blog then he shouldn't be flogging it here."

FR doesn't allow ANY videos you must goto another site to see them. Do you rail on about Video Bloggers who post their work on FR?

Do you even have the slightest clue at all about the issue of Copyright Law and how FR works as far as video Content goes?

44 posted on 06/19/2010 9:27:30 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

If I copy the Star Spangled Banner and change a word I do not own it as my original work.

If you want to post a video link use the original link not a link to your crappy blog.

If you don’t want to be taken to task for blog pimping then don’t do it.

Simple.


45 posted on 06/19/2010 9:35:51 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Do you rail on about Video Bloggers who post their work on FR?

No, I rail about people who post other's work on their crap blog instead of the original site where the actual person with talent keeps the rest of THEIR work.

See, simple.

46 posted on 06/19/2010 9:38:44 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; Eaker
Do you even have the slightest clue at all about the issue of Copyright Law

What does copyright law have to do with some lame blogger
scratching out some grammatically unsound and boring drivel
and then posting a teaser to it on FR, forcing readers to
provide blog hits to read the rest of the snivelly content?

What does copyright law have to do with some lame blogger
stealing someone's video off Youtube, embedding it on his
virus-laden blog and posting a teaser to it on FR, forcing readers to
provide blog hits to see a video the pimp HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH?

47 posted on 06/19/2010 9:42:43 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
And because I don’t want to waste Jim’s valuable electrons AND because I want to get people to my website, I excerpt. Sort of the same reason the LA Times and the Washington Post sued Jim.

I think if Jim had a problem with you wasting his valuable electrons, he'd let you know. If what you write is worth reading (and it seems interesting enough to me) then in time, as others became familiar with your work, they'll see your thread, contribute- rather than just questioning your motives, and eventually someone would go to your site first and post your article here.

48 posted on 06/19/2010 9:47:34 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty; moneyrunner

You nailed it.

The problem is that the blog pimps are too lazy to do any heavy lifting. If this feller had posted his full length article and I felt it was good I would have visited his blog. I however won’t now because he took the lazy path rather than put some effort out.

I don’t do business with people who cheat at golf either.


49 posted on 06/19/2010 9:53:20 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
Your check’s in the mail.

I doubt your check is any better than your writing so no thanks.

At least the thread got some hits even if your blog didn't.

50 posted on 06/19/2010 9:55:13 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson