Posted on 09/13/2010 4:37:50 AM PDT by 1234
Following the release of several passport applications of Stanley Ann Dunham to Christopher Strunk on July 29, 2010, The Post & Email sent in its own FOIA request to the General Services Administration (GSA) for all records pertaining to the alleged destruction of non-vital records
during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from the General Services Administration as claimed by State Department employee Jonathan M. Rolbin to Mr. Strunk....Why were records from 1965 and after released for Stanley Ann Dunham, but those from the years 1960-64 were not? Stanley Anns son, Barack Hussein Obama II, allegedly was born during one of those years, 1961. If he was born in Hawaii as he claims, why werent those records released which would reflect that fact? And why is the GSA denying the veracity of Mr. Boldins statement?If passport records are maintained from 1925 to the present, then who ordered the alleged destruction of the records of Stanley Ann Dunham, who, as far as we know, was not a government employee? And why is the State Department claiming that the GSA ordered it,
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Hawaii Newspaper Portal from Hawaii State Library
They may be correct in saying that the PAPER records were destroyed. However, before destroying any paper record, a microfiche copy had to have been made. After all, she was still alive in 1985. Those are legal documents pertaining to her. By law they could not destroy them since she had a legal interest in them. So, there should be MICROFICHE copies of ALL the records pertaining to her.
Yes, many key decision makers in Gov doing their part for the Obama lie.
It’s getting to the point that I think I’ll faint if someone in the govt actually tells the truth. It’s just like talking to your kids to find out who broke something? You know someone did it but no one wants to admit it.
RS: Yes, many key decision makers in Gov doing their part for the Obama lie.
Why are there so many enablers? Why is he protected by the silence of those who should be asking questions. If he is hiding something other than the birth issue, what is it? The truth is the truth. I would rather adjust to the truth, whatever it is, than live with a lie.
We are living with a lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.