Skip to comments.GSA refutes State Departmentís claim about destruction of records
Posted on 09/13/2010 4:37:50 AM PDT by 1234
Following the release of several passport applications of Stanley Ann Dunham to Christopher Strunk on July 29, 2010, The Post & Email sent in its own FOIA request to the General Services Administration (GSA) for all records pertaining to the alleged destruction of non-vital records
during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from the General Services Administration as claimed by State Department employee Jonathan M. Rolbin to Mr. Strunk....Why were records from 1965 and after released for Stanley Ann Dunham, but those from the years 1960-64 were not? Stanley Anns son, Barack Hussein Obama II, allegedly was born during one of those years, 1961. If he was born in Hawaii as he claims, why werent those records released which would reflect that fact? And why is the GSA denying the veracity of Mr. Boldins statement?If passport records are maintained from 1925 to the present, then who ordered the alleged destruction of the records of Stanley Ann Dunham, who, as far as we know, was not a government employee? And why is the State Department claiming that the GSA ordered it,
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Wow, History’s greatest con continues to unravel.
Gorelick and Sandy Berger.
Neither gives a damn about truth, accountability, or
Gorelick's book "Destruction of Evidence"
On Aug. 22, 1996, just before the Democratic National Convention,
Ms. Gorelick oversaw a critical Justice Department meeting with the FBI.
Immediately after this meeting, as it happened,
all serious inquiry into the fate of TWA 800 came to an end.
Berger purloined all draft revisions of a key critique of the government's response
to the millennium terrorism threat, a document that detailed Administration knowledge
and inaction regarding al Qaeda presence in the U.S. in 1999
and 2000. Stolen were crucial notes in the margins of these drafts
which reveal the thinking and agendas of the
Clinton Administration relating to the mounting terrorist threat.
Washington Post, "Berger Quits as Advisor to Kerry", Susan Schmidt
Berger was not qualified as NSA.
He was a millionaire lawyer and lobbyist with a career centered on expanding trade with China.
Tom Laughlin, http://www.billyjack.com/jung/08_politics/articles/990515_spy.html
Former FBI Director Louis Freeh opined that
Burger was a public-relations hack, interested in how something would play in the press .
The New Yorker, per http://www.nationalreview.com/lowry/lowry200311030753.asp
Dick Morris noted Berger seemed to work overtime
at opposing tough measures against terror,
advising vetoes of legislation aimed at crippling Iranian terror funding
and working to block antiterror sanctions.
Wall Street Journal, "While Clinton Fiddled", Dick Morris
Why were records from 1965 and after released for Stanley Ann Dunham, but those from the years 1960-64 were not? Stanley Anns son, Barack Hussein Obama II, allegedly was born during one of those years, 1961. If he was born in Hawaii as he claims, why werent those records released which would reflect that fact?
Even if the passport applications disappeared there are records of passports issued..if those have been tampered with then there are travel records in NARA..and if those are tampered with we have lost our country to corruption plain and simple.
GSA refutes State Departments claim about destruction of records
Why were records from 1965 and after released for Stanley Ann Dunham, but those from the years 1960-64 were not? Stanley Anns son, Barack Hussein 0bama II, allegedly was born during one of those years, 1961. If he was born in Hawaii as he claims, why werent those records released which would reflect that fact?
Article, also # 1 and # 5.
[Thanks, Fred Nerks.]
One lie is never enough. You’d think they’d learn after a while.
Like Watergate it’s the coverup that will get them...
Like Rathergate the lies will also finally come home to roost...and it can’t be too soon.
In an affidavit there was presented a memo allegedly from 1985 in which the DOS informed its offices that the disposition for passport records from 1925 through 1968 had been changed from 100 years to 15-20 years for records meeting certain criteria, and the project to destroy the records slated for destruction was complete through November of 1961, with the destruction of records from Dec 1961-Dec 1965 to follow and destruction of records through 1968 to follow that.
Unfortunately for the Passport Office, the retention schedules don’t show any traces of a change from 100 years, to 15-20 years, and then back to 100 years.
And Dunham’s passport records from 1967 and 1968 don’t match the criteria for records that should have been retained, nor do the passport applications for Phil Jacobsen’s mother - yet all were retained.
There’s a more complete post of what we know so far at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/the-whopper-that-got-away-4/
The Passport Office needs to respond by Thursday. Should be interesting, to say the least.
There are a LOT of people who have been involved in this coverup. Maybe we can clean out Washington DC altogether after this. lol
Thanks for the ping Lucy. The evidence continues to mount, the pieces of the puzzle are coming together nicely. tick tock tick tock
But...but...but what about the riots? Can we handle that, 0b0z0?
YES WE CAN!
...It is widely accepted that Obamas mother died in 1995, but is there a death certificate for her?...
Death Certificate? I'd be happy with the obit. Try finding a copy of Stanley Ann's and/or Stanley Armour's obit on the web (or even in HI from what I understand)
Publisher: HONOLULU ADVERTISER
Date: 1995 11 17
Title: DUNHAM, STANLEY A; AKA ANN DUNHAM SUTORO
Publisher: HONOLULU ADVERTISER
Date: 1992 02 12
Title: DUNHAM, STANLEY A
Obituaries from 1995 (or 1992) are not that hard to find. Some obits might take a while, but they are found. The few places I have found archives for the Advertiser, guess which dates are among the few missing editions? (Rhetorical question only)
Here’s a sweet bit of music
Wizard of OZ predicted current political situation SEE the PROOF Music by : Buster B Jones
All are missing from all archives?
Who has checked?
This is not to say they do not exist. It does say they are incredibly hard to find. Conspiracy? Standing on its own, of course not. Add it to the mix and what are the odds so much is missing from the public record regarding one man?
I am resourceful. I am good at finding information behind the cobwebs. I have approached this from every direction I can think of. I come up empty each time.
Where did you get the information regarding what date the obituary was in? If you got it from Ancestry.com it could well be disinformation. I’ve run into a lot of disinformation there.
Hawaii Newspaper Portal from Hawaii State Library
They may be correct in saying that the PAPER records were destroyed. However, before destroying any paper record, a microfiche copy had to have been made. After all, she was still alive in 1985. Those are legal documents pertaining to her. By law they could not destroy them since she had a legal interest in them. So, there should be MICROFICHE copies of ALL the records pertaining to her.
Yes, many key decision makers in Gov doing their part for the Obama lie.
It’s getting to the point that I think I’ll faint if someone in the govt actually tells the truth. It’s just like talking to your kids to find out who broke something? You know someone did it but no one wants to admit it.
RS: Yes, many key decision makers in Gov doing their part for the Obama lie.
Why are there so many enablers? Why is he protected by the silence of those who should be asking questions. If he is hiding something other than the birth issue, what is it? The truth is the truth. I would rather adjust to the truth, whatever it is, than live with a lie.
We are living with a lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.