Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fair Tax? No thanks
Coach is Right ^ | JANUARY 23RD, 2011 | Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

Posted on 01/23/2011 7:27:20 AM PST by jmaroneps37

When my financial advisor gave me a lot of caveats about the new Fair Tax surfacing in Congress, what I really heard him saying was, “You can’t trust government.”

The unintended consequences of the proposed Fair Tax are pause for alarm because “when they sell a Fair Tax, they don’t tell you about other taxes” that will conveniently remain on the books.

“In theory if the government says they’ll take away all other taxes, do they?”

The Fair Tax is a misnomer in Europe. The income tax was not abolished when they added a VAT value added tax or Fair Tax. The problem is, they are suffocating the average European citizen.

A United Kingdom VAT of 17.5% on top of a 50% income tax totals a 67.5% fed to the amorphous blob; in France: VAT 19.6%, income tax 40%, total 59.6%; Greece: income tax 40%, VAT 25%, total tax 65%; Spain: VAT 16%, income tax 45%. In Sweden a 25% VAT plus a 55% income tax results in an eye popping 80% tax individuals feed to the government wow! Denmark’s 83% is even worse!

”The United States is heading right down the same path,” my advisor tells me. Initially our current administration looks to propose a minuscule amount of only 1% or 2%, just like Europe started out imposing. Our 14 trillion dollar debt load is not sustainable, but he stresses VAT economies are deeply mired in gargantuan debt loads as well.

The American notion of hard work and perseverance enables anyone to get ahead here. “Do you think that can ever happen with tax rates between 60% to 80%?” he asks.

What would our lives be like with the European model of Obama’s redistribution of wealth? Consider never being able to buy a home....

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: fairtax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
A VAT might be something to stay clear of until we are certain of how it would work.
1 posted on 01/23/2011 7:27:21 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

repeal the 16th amendment first, then we can talk about it.


2 posted on 01/23/2011 7:32:16 AM PST by henry_reardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The Fair tax proposal is very clear that the Fair tax goes into effect only after the 16th amendment is repealed.


3 posted on 01/23/2011 7:32:27 AM PST by johnpannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henry_reardon

See tagline.


4 posted on 01/23/2011 7:33:59 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The Fair Tax is NOT a vat tax.

A vat tax is a hidden tax on profits.

The Fair Tax is a national sales tax that replaces income, payroll, capital gains, and corporate taxes.

Oppose the Fair Tax if you like, but don’t lie about it.


5 posted on 01/23/2011 7:35:31 AM PST by ziravan (Are you better off now than you were 7 Trillion Dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
A VAT might be something to stay clear of until we are certain of how it would work.

A VAT is something to stay away from under ANY circumstances!

A VAT is the unseen killer.

Once implemented government will take as demanded until nothing is left to take.

I see it as the withheld income tax on steroids, if you don't see it taken out of your hand, if you don't write a check for it, you won't miss it.

Anything Europe does, we should be running from.

Didn't we learn our lesson in the 18th century?

6 posted on 01/23/2011 7:36:44 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Suzanne Eovaldi couldn't be further off the mark and obviously hasn't bothered to read The Fair Tax Act(HR25). If she had she would realize The Fair Tax Act will abolish the IRS by defunding and has a sunset provision that will repeal The Fair Tax and return to the federal income tax code if the 16th Amendment is not repealed within seven years from the time the Fair Tax Act is enacted. Moreover there is concurrent legislation, House Joint Resolution 16, starting the process to repeal the 16th Amendment. Consequently we will never have The Fair Tax with the federal income tax code.

Moreover the federal income tax code is a VAT!! Corporations pass on the cost of taxes levied on their income along with compliance costs to consumers by including those costs at each stage of production, the same as a VAT. No one complains because they aren't seen. The Fair Tax will remove those embedded taxes and make the tax transparent by itemizing the rate on the receipt at the point of sale.
7 posted on 01/23/2011 7:39:43 AM PST by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ziravan
The Fair Tax is a national sales tax that replaces income, payroll, capital gains, and corporate taxes.

That way everyone pays.

No special political favors can be given.

If we must be taxed, the (true) fair tax as you have stated it, is the ONLY fair tax available.

8 posted on 01/23/2011 7:39:50 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

This is a totally misleading piece on the FairTax, and it perennially surfaces whenever Tax Reform talk is in the air.

The FairTax is NOT A VAT, not even close. Inside the legislation for the FairTax Code (H.R. 25), there is a provision that the FairTax sunsets (dies) unless the 16th Amendment is repealed.

Anyone that does their due diligence knows the above and if they have been following the discussions here on FR and elsewhere, they know there is a cabal of lobbyists that work each day to spread disinformation and propaganda about the FairTax.

Once someone gets serious to really study the legislation which is only 134 pages long, they will see that the FairTax is vastly superior IN EVERY RESPECT to what exists today, from collection, to transparency, to enforcement and on and on.


9 posted on 01/23/2011 7:43:03 AM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
To get the marginal rate, one can not just add a sales tax rate to the income tax rate. There can be timing differences (Income after tax saved one year and spent the next).

Take the case of a 50% income tax and a 50% sales tax. Say you earn $1,500 and want to spend every dollar you can in the same year. So, after Income Tax you have $750 to blow. Buy something that cost $500 and give the last $250 to the gov't.

Note that %50% + %50% doesn't equal 100%. I would appear to be 2/3 * 100%.

10 posted on 01/23/2011 7:46:31 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"they will see that the FairTax is vastly superior IN EVERY RESPECT to what exists today"

Not true. The transition from one to the other is not set up to be done in a "fair" way. Savings made before teh transition and spent after get double taxed, BIG TIME.

11 posted on 01/23/2011 7:49:13 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

I still need to clarify one nagging point on the Fair Tax.

I’ve paid taxes on my income all my life and have managed to put away enough in savings for comfortable support when I retire.

Now, no one pays income tax, but pays higher tax on everything bought. Pffft! There goes any advantage of having a tax protected nest egg.


12 posted on 01/23/2011 7:50:44 AM PST by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

So I worked hard, got paid, paid taxes on that money I earned and somehow managed to save some of it. Now some people have the idea they want to tax me again when I use the money in retirement that I was already paid taxes on? BS


13 posted on 01/23/2011 7:55:00 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I’ve been leery of Fair tax but I’m warming up to it if it can be passed pretty much intact.

H.R. 25

>>To promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the
income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service,
and enacting a national sales tax to be administered primarily by the
States.<<

Full text (pdf file)

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr25ih/pdf/BILLS-112hr25ih.pdf


14 posted on 01/23/2011 7:55:47 AM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: plangent; Paladin2

There is no way to accomplish a transition that doesn’t negatively affect in some way. We need to look long term. If we believe that a change is necessary, which it is, then we will need to accept the responsibility and acknowledge that there will be some pain.


15 posted on 01/23/2011 7:56:42 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: plangent
I still need to clarify one nagging point on the Fair Tax. I’ve paid taxes on my income all my life and have managed to put away enough in savings for comfortable support when I retire. Now, no one pays income tax, but pays higher tax on everything bought. Pffft! There goes any advantage of having a tax protected nest egg.

Not true. For people that manage to save under the current tax scheme (that greatly penalizes savings), the ability to to save under the Fair Tax will more than offset any supposed disadvantage to such a system.

In addition, your current savings, when matched with the resulting economic boom as we change from a tax structure based on debt to one based on savings (read investment), will greatly increase.

If you are a saver, the downside of the Fair Tax is minimal. The upside is huge.
16 posted on 01/23/2011 7:57:18 AM PST by ziravan (Are you better off now than you were 7 Trillion Dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
Now some people have the idea they want to tax me again when I use the money in retirement that I was already paid taxes on?

Yeah, that would be like paying tax on your social security tax when you get payments.

That would be double taxation so they would NEVER tax your social security. /s

17 posted on 01/23/2011 7:59:01 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

The current tax system is based on debt and penalizes savings.

The Fair Tax encourages savings (saving is tax free) and therefore encourages the resulting investment.

If you are a saver, changing to a tax system that encourages savings is an advantage that more than offsets the tax liabilities of consumption.

Add in your ability to engage in tax avoidance - buy used, buy less and don’t get tax (and these are things that savers do anyway), and the Fair Tax offers a huge advantage to savers.

It is a tax system DESIGNED for savers.


18 posted on 01/23/2011 8:01:36 AM PST by ziravan (Are you better off now than you were 7 Trillion Dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I’ve been leery of Fair tax but I’m warming up to it if it can be passed pretty much intact.

Me too.

It's the "pure form" that creates the hurdle however.

Politicians thrive on "picking away" at things until they are no longer recognizable for what they are meant to be.

They can't help themselves.

19 posted on 01/23/2011 8:02:55 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“Note that %50% + %50% doesn’t equal 100%. I would appear to be 2/3 * 100%.”

I caught that too. You don’t simply add up the taxes when combining, since they interact with each other. If that were the case, then a 50% income tax and 60% VAT would mean that people could not buy anything, but that would not be the case - as they would still have 50% of their income left over to buy overpriced consumer items.

The way to do the math for the case of a 20% income tax and 70% VAT is something like:

Start with $1.00
Take away 20% - you get 80 cents
Take that number and divide by 1.70 (one dollar plus 70% VAT)
You get 47 cents left, so your effective tax rate is 53%

Don’t ask me why it works, but it seems to work.


20 posted on 01/23/2011 8:03:13 AM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson