Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soviet Space Expert James Oberg Writes that “Palin was Right” About Sputnik
conservatives4palin ^ | Friday January 28, 2011

Posted on 01/28/2011 8:13:42 PM PST by Bigtigermike

Instapundit notes that Soviet space expert James Oberg supports Governor Palin’s comments on Sputnik:

I’m seeing up close how “Palin Derangement Syndrome” can compel otherwise intelligent people to foam at the mouth and babble nonsense to prove they’re right and she’s wrong.

The historical view is that the early Soviet victories in the Space Race led to the US response of the Apollo program, whose triumph validated the superiority of US space technology — which had profound diplomatic, military, commercial, and cultural consequences. When Reagan challenged the USSR with Strategic Defense in the 1980s, Apollo had given that challenge credibility — and the same pundits in the West and in Russian who pooh-poohed SDI had also pooh-poohed the odds of Apollo working.

Proven wrong once, they lost credibility when Gorbachyov had to decide when/.if to pull the plug on the USSR’s own hideously expensive space weapons programs (eg, Polyus-Skif and Buran). Soviet leadership came to believe, rightly or wrongly, that SDI was a lethal threat to them, based on the success of Apollo that had only been made possible by the stinging US defeats in the early Space Race, It’s more complicated, but the essence is, Palin was right: the Soviets sowed the seed of their own collapse by setting off the Space Race.

James Edward Oberg (often known as Jim Oberg) is an American space journalist and historian, regarded as an expert on the Russian space program.


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: elections; freepressforpalin; jamesoberg; obama; obamaspeech; palin; palinwtf; pds; sarahpalin; spoutnik; sputnik
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: edpc

“The Nedelin disaster was a key in leapfrogging the Soviets in the 60s. Wonder if the whole story will ever come out.”

This seems like a pretty complete version of the story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nedelin_catastrophe
What’s missing?


61 posted on 01/29/2011 4:18:37 AM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DrC

You may have read the part about Mikhail Yangel conveniently stepping out for a smoke break. Just wonder about sabotage and potential role foreign intelligence services may have had in it.


62 posted on 01/29/2011 4:41:40 AM PST by edpc (It's Kräusened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I note that a troll sounds like a female, jealous of the good Governor.


63 posted on 01/29/2011 5:44:14 AM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Wallop the Cat; meadsjn; calcowgirl; indylindy; stephenjohnbanker; pissant
RE :”Yep, you’re absolutely right. Palin was 100% correct in blaming the collapse of the Soviet Union on Sputnik, just as she was 100% correct that the answer to the economic malaise is to have more potato donut shops. .”

You know if the USSR fell in 1980 and or in early 1981 and Jimmy Carter was widely given credit for it like Reagan is, the Sputnik theory would gain more popularily here and with Republicans in general. But because it was Reagan that won the cold floor they are going to have trouble selling this re-writing of history WITH ANYONE just to cover a mistake. Here's an interesting writing and FR post that doesnt mention Sputnik:

Dinesh D'Souza: Reagan won the Cold War |The Australian | June 07 2004 FR post| Author Dinesh D'Souza

An interesting quote from that:

Yet many historians and pundits have refused to credit Ronald Reagan's policies for helping to bring about the Cold War victory. .Rather, they insist that Soviet communism suffered from chronic economic problems and predictably lapsed, as Time magazine's Strobe Talbott put it., “not because of anything the outside world has done or not done . . . but because of defects and inadequacies at its core”.

and

“.Margaret Thatcher remarked a few years ago that Reagan would go down in history as the man who “won the Cold War without firing a shot”. .Perhaps it is too much to ask the wise to admit their errors. But it's only right that Reagan deserves due credit during his lifetime for his prescient statesmanship. “

64 posted on 01/29/2011 5:51:22 AM PST by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ...

Thanks Bigtigermike. Oberg makes a great point about the Apollo card played by Reagan to force the USSR into a corner. SDI (the constant MSM drumbeat by the partisan shills was, and is, to call it "Star Wars") couldn't work -- we were told -- but decades earlier Koralev had said that Von Braun wouldn't be able to solve all the problems of using 100% cryo engines. Then, two years later, Koralev reads how Von Braun had those engines on the test stand.
65 posted on 01/29/2011 8:03:38 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

I was told in journalism class that the definition of news is whatever the media considers news.


66 posted on 01/29/2011 8:06:31 AM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I've seen no one here arguing that Reagan doesn't deserve credit for "winning the Cold War". That final decade of commumism falling apart would not likely have happened without Reagan's Star Wars Initiative as a catalyst. It takes no credit away from Reagan to point out that communism never was a sustainable economic system, and that the massive increase in their deficit spending started with the Space Race and Sputnik.

We have no shortage of myopic, narrow-minded retards here in the US who get irate when the roots of our current economic collapse are traced back to changes in ideas, attitudes, and business practices, starting three decades ago.

Obama was the one babbling on about "our Sputnik moment" for the weeks leading up to the SOTU address, and Obama is the one who had the audacity to insert some more babbling nonsense about "out Sputnik moment" into the SOTU address.

That someone, anyone latched on to several of his "points" as a starting point for rebuttals should be no surprise.

That so many people lash out, Alinsky style, against someone offering rebuttals against Obama's propaganda speech, only points out which side of the aisle these critics really hail from. That's you; on Obama's side.

67 posted on 01/29/2011 8:36:38 AM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

I wish you had a video of that class.


68 posted on 01/29/2011 8:44:59 AM PST by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge, MA grad student. Any potential conservative Christian FReepmail-FRiends out there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Muahahahaha!


69 posted on 01/29/2011 8:48:12 AM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: BOOM. Taste My Cluebat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

It’s a SPUTNIK moment alright:

S ARAH
P ALIN
U NHINGES
T HE
N ARCISSISTIC
I NEXPERIENCED
K ENYAN


From one Bob to another, let me say: LOL


70 posted on 01/29/2011 11:24:37 AM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass
If Palin was right, but Big Media doesn’t report it, do most people go on believing the lie anyway?

Do you?

If you don't go on believing the lie, isn't it safe to assume that many others don't either?

71 posted on 01/29/2011 11:30:52 AM PST by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
(Yes, I know they also killed 100 million people, but it's easier to get people worked up over a dog.)

Ain't it the truth.

72 posted on 01/29/2011 11:34:23 AM PST by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

On Sputnik and the fall of the USSR she has a huge timeline problem. Sputnik was 1957. The USSR didnt collapse until 1989 and that was Reagan that did it, not Sputnik. The Soviet’s went broke on the military because Reagan stood up to them. Just a few years earlier under Carter they were rolling into country after country hardly broke from Sputnik in 1957. Read Ann Coulters book Treason.


Ann Coulter writes some good stuff, but I don’t recall seeing her labeled a “Soviet Space Expert”.


And there is no conflict between Coulter and Palin on the major issue here. It’s simply a contrivance of the other poster.

Palin’s point is that the precedent for the Soviets losing an arms race (or a tech race) was foretold in the space race. If you mark the launch of Sputnik as the END of a race, the Soviets won. But if you mark it as the beginning of a race...

When decades later the Sovs were hanging by a thread under the challenge of Reagan, the loss of the space race in the 1960s simply gave them less faith they could win and thus less reason to hang on.

An argument FOR that might have been available to hard-liners in Moscow was gone. An argument AGAINST was rooted in history. History had already recorded that they LOST tech races with us. “Back then it was Reagan, and he understood.”

Today it is Sarah, and she does too.

(And the citation of Treason by the other poster is errant.)


73 posted on 01/29/2011 11:39:18 AM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

No. We actually get this information on FR. Most Americans do not.


74 posted on 01/29/2011 11:42:21 AM PST by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge, MA grad student. Any potential conservative Christian FReepmail-FRiends out there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

You would be surprised how many people out there are as tuned in as FReepers are who have never even heard of Free Republic. I talk to them all the time. This is a great place for information but it is far from being the only one. Besides, a lot of people don’t need to be spoon fed the truth to know the truth. They see through the BS the liberal media spews.


75 posted on 01/29/2011 12:01:11 PM PST by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PaleoBob
And there is no conflict between Coulter and Palin on the major issue here. It’s simply a contrivance of the other poster.

I fully agree with that.

“Back then it was Reagan, and he understood.”
Today it is Sarah, and she does too.

I fully agree again. Sarah Palin is the anti-Obama. Unless and until others on the right step forward and assume that role, as forcefully and as consistently as she has, then I'll continue to insist that attacks against Sarah Palin are from pro-Obama elements or from the equally destructive liberal Republicans. Any half-measure adjustments envisioned by the "moderate" establishment Republicans will not stave off the economic disaster that the USA is facing.

There are many people and some campaigns pretending to be on the "right" who have no qualms about employing the Alinsky tactics developed and practiced by the "left".

For instance, why are these discussions about the SOTU address being redirected so strongly against those who issued rebuttals against Obama's communist propaganda in the SOTU? Obama is, hypothecally, the president, and even when we had legitimate presidents, their public speeches were subject to much analysis, rebuttals, and outright disagreement, point-by-point and on their overall themes.

This goober warrants much closer scrutiny, and such is long overdue.

76 posted on 01/29/2011 12:17:30 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

I’m sure it’s still being taught on the first day of class at every university across the U.S.


77 posted on 01/29/2011 12:57:02 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

I’m still pretty worked up over Leika, and I wasn’t even born then.


78 posted on 01/29/2011 1:05:16 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (We conservatives will always lose elections as long as we allow the MSM to choose our candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
I was in third grade and remember going out at night and trying to see Sputnik (unsuccessfully--where we lived then there were a lot of tall trees so not much of the sky was clearly visible) and people talking about the dog on board.

There is a lot of information about her in the Wikipedia article "Laika." The Russian version of the article calls her a "dog-cosmonaut" and shows a pack of cigarettes from a brand named in her honor. She was a stray found wandering in Moscow, a mongrel, thought to be 3 years old.

79 posted on 01/29/2011 2:05:15 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
Ain't it the truth.

In the immortal words of the Cowardly Lion in "The Wizard of Oz."

80 posted on 01/29/2011 2:07:08 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson