Why I’d Marry Ann Coulter

Weekend Libertarian ^ | June 23, 2011 | B.P. Terpstra

[AustralianConservative]

Ann Coulter is right to defend the time-honored institution of marriage. It’s what separates critical-thinking Americans from left-liberal barbarians (aka socialist Europeans). In Portugal, the state ceased fighting the “war on drugs” and defending man-and-wife families, only to become a bigger socio-economic basket case. A little secret: Doped up fatherless boys are dependent citizens! Who’d have guessed?

As for the Netherlands, the happy picture libertarians painted us was based on an Orwellian government-first lie, swallowed whole by Cato, for decades. Blessing dopey fatherless families only created more government-dependence, but that’s another story. Still, to be fair to my Dutch cousins, they’re trying to rewind the clock. We were wrong. It’s just that liberal Dutch arrogance prevents us from saying so.

I’ve seen the progressive revolutions – and they’re beautiful lies; big juicy lies supported by communists and their enablers (aka libertarians). It probably explains why, in part, even Frenchman are making right turns. This month, for example, to the fury of self-identified communists and socialists, France’s lower house of parliament rejected a bill to redefine marriage. Or as Coulter probably responded, “All the manly French guys are on my side.”

So, are sheltered libertarians naïve or certifiable? As the columnist and author of eight New York Times bestsellers noted last week, “They lure you in with talk of small government and then immediately start babbling about drug legalization or gay marriage.”

And, I love this Coulterism: “There are reasons we have laws governing important institutions, such as marriage. As in landscaping, you don't remove a wall until you know why it was put there.”

[B4Ranch]

In that case you need to open, copy and save this

http://verydemotivational.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/129128090771083238.jpg

[Maceman]

I wonder if the author has considered what it would be like to be married to her when she was angry at him.

[Kevmo]

high duhh factor

also, TTIUWOP

[sushiman]

You haven’t seen the photos of Japanese women on my computer who are so feminine they make Ann look like a former guy . Trust me . To each his own as they say . I wouldn’t spend a night with Coulter for less than a million dollars , No kiss either .

[RonDog]

From her recent cover story in Townhall Magazine:

[Yorlik803]

I bet she would love a big bacon-cheeseburger, onion rings and a tall draft of domestic beer. Then a nice Cohiba followed by taunting libs while they cough and toss dirty looks.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks AustralianConservative.

[MHGinTN]

I used to think it would a gas to have dinner with Ann, and listen to her berate the progressives. Not any more. She writes well, but whoring herself to the media to sell her books has tainted her permanently ... and her love of the Mittiac is disgusting since she claims to be so conservative smart.

[SunkenCiv]

Yeah, it sometimes amazes me that we conservatives have any cohesion at all. :’)

I’m sure she favors Mitt because she thinks he’s the best shot to whip Zero’s ass from coast to coast. I’m in one of my optimistic periods, and think Zero will lose 40 states in 2012, and the idiotic idea in California (and elsewhere) to tie the Electoral Votes to the nationwide popular vote will result in some hilarity for all of us.

Of course, that’s give or take all the “I’m voting independent” and “everyone is a RINO” troll-talk. :’)

[Scanian]

Me neither.

I’d be afraid those knees might stab me to death.

I read an article somewhere in which Skinny Annie criticized Princess Diana as “anorexic, bulimic, and narcisistic.”

DO WHAT??? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! I’ve been calling Coulter “Annie Rexia” for years.

Some folks need to take a hard look in the mirror before they start taking swipes at others——especially the dead.