Skip to comments.Update on my(Orly Taitz) trip to DC yesterday
Posted on 09/23/2011 12:07:27 PM PDT by rxsid
"Update on Taitz's Congressional Meetings with 12 High Ranking Senators and Congressmen
Update on my(Orly Taitz) trip to DC yesterday
I came back from DC in the middle of the night.
I will write a full report a bit later. I flew red eye there, red eye back I have to be back at work today. To add to the hardship, I was diagnosed with a stress fracture in my foot and had to walk between 6 large buildings all day long in a lot of pain, ending up going bare foot between the meetings and carrying my shoes in my hands together with my purse and my brief case and dying of heat in my black lawyers suit. I forwarded my information on Social security fraud to 12 high ranking senators and congressmen and had personal in depth meetings with legal counsel, chiefs of staff and senior advisers for 4 high ranking senators and 3 representatives: Senator Tom Coburn-ranking member of the subcommittee on privacy on senate judicial committee, Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Marco Rubio, Congressman Lamar Smith-chair f the House Judiciary committee, Congressman Alen West, Congressman Steven King.
I also forwarded my information to Senator Schumer, Senator Lieberman, Senator Feinstein, Senator Lautenberg, Senator Blumenthal. Unlike prior 7 , who are conservative Republicans, these 5 senators are Democrats, (Lieberman is a former Democrat, currently Independent) but might join the fight for other reasons.
Some of the chiefs of staff and legal counsel will work together in arranging for me to testify at one of the committee or subcommittee hearings. I should hear from them within a week. It is very important for you as constituency to write to Chair of Judiciary committee Lamar Smith and his legal counsel Holt Lackey and to the ranking member of the House subcommittee on privacy within Senate Judiciary committee Senator Tom Coburn and his chief of staff Michael Schwartz, thanking them for the meeting, for reading the pleadings and investigating the issue and urge them to invite me to the committee hearings to testify on the issue. Keep in mind, they have subpoena power, they can subpoena Judge Lamberth, Judge Puglisi, director of Health Loretta Fuddy, Registrar Onaka, Commissioner of Social Security Astrue and demand answers, whether high ranking officials can commit crimes and use privacy as an excuse, knowing that their appointees and inferior officials will be afraid to do independent investigation. Can 311 million US citizens lose their Constitutional right for redress of grievances and be forced to live under illegitimate regime of an individual occupying the White Hose based on a fraudulently obtained Social Security number and a computer generated forgery instead of a birth certificate, due to the fact, that officials and judges refuse to take on the issues and use privacy as an excuse?
After I landed I was on the air with Doug McIntire KABC and was able to provide millions of people with above information. I also mentioned on the air my interview to Univision in Spanish and the fact, that Hispanic population is extremely angry, that they have to go through e-verify, but Obama can sit in the position of the President with a failed e-verify. Republicans desperately need Republican vote and will lose this vote, if they or their high ranking officials, Like Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Martinez, Governor Sandoval do not raise this issue. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=25819"
|Age||Residency (or years citizen)|
|President & Commander in Chief (1 of 1)||natural born Citizen||
|35||14 years resident|
|Senator (1 of many)||Citizen||
|30||9 years a Citizen|
|Represantative (1 of many)||Citizen||
|25||7 years a Citizen|
"Update on Taitz's Congressional Meetings with 12 High Ranking Senators and Congressmen"
Ok, how about a joke to lighten the mood.
So a muslim, a black man and a socialist walk into a bar.
“Good evening, Mr. President” said the bartender.
...........cue Buddy Holiday song....
Just this week the Washington Post had a rather prominent story on Sheriff Arapio’s investigation into Obama’s fraud and eligibility. The editors of this paper didn't need to do this. They could have **ignored** the story!
Why would the Washington Post bother to cover the story of Arapio’s investigation? Hm? Yes, the story took the usual jabs at the birthers, but surely the editors **know** that by simply giving space to Obama’s eligibility they will ( and are) reawakening this story. They know that by giving CPR to this dead horse that the story **will** revive, start to breathe, and have a beating heart again.
Yeah, because the Washington Post can be counted upon to push stories beneficial to our cause!
And I have a bridge to sell you.
This stuff has worked out quite well for them all around - why wouldn’t they want “BIRTHER MADNESS - ROUND 2!!!”???
The headline is not true, or at least it doesn’t jibe with the article, which says she met with staffers, and doesn’t say she met with the congresscritters
Fact: Obama failed e-verify
Fact: Obama has used multiple social security numbers
Fact: Obama posted forgeries of so-called birth documents
Fact: No one remembers Obama from Columbia
Fact: Obama has never released any certifiable birth documents, when he could easily and promptly do so.
Fact: Obama has never provided passport records, when he could easily and promptly do so.
Fact: Obama has never released any information about the citizenship used as a student applying to college, when he could easily and promptly do so.
Fact: Obama could have easily proven to LTC Lakin that he was a natural born citizen
Fact: ALL of the above could be settled promptly in a week or two for under $200.
Fact: Obama has not released any information about his law license application.
Fact: Obama has sent expensive private and **GOVERNMENT** attorneys across America to prevent others from resolving the above issues.
Fact, FACT, FACT!: A **real** natural born American would be **honored** to promptly prove with the best evidence that they were a natural born citizen and a legitimate president and Commander in Chief. They would be especially **pleased** to do this for a member of the military.
And any politician worth his salt would wait until a GOP candidate got invested in this, thinking it was their “Trump card” - and then blow them out of the water and make him and anyone who believed him look like a bunch of mouth breathing morons.
Oh wait! He did!
Do you really think it is in Obama’s interest for the Washington Post to be beating this sleeping beehive with a stick? I don't think so.
Powerful Dems want Obama gone!
The Washington Post is one of those strings.
0bama will almost certainly be the Donkey candidate in 2012 - and if he is not it will be because he knows he will lose and be a downballot disaster - he will pull a LBJ and be gone.
The birth certificate nonsense props him up - and has always been of benefit to him - not ONCE has it been a detriment to him.
But maybe THIS TIME Orly Taitz will not be revealed to once again be a nitwit famewhore with no legal acumen THIS TIME she really has the goods!!!!/s
The interview with investigator Susan Daniels about all the document discrepancies is worth listening to
I disagree. Just before Obama released his last **forgery**, polls showed that **huge** segments of the population doubted Obama’s natural born citizenship ( in one way or another). This even included a very significant percentage of Democrat voters. ( You can look them up if you wish.)
There is no way that the eligibility issue can help Obama. His handlers know this. If they want Obama gone, his eligibility will be one of several strings they will pull on their puppet.
The very best thing for Obama would be for there to be no news coverage on his questionable natural born citizenship.,...but...there it is. The Washington Post covered a story that they could have **easily** ignored.
A total route - disgrace and disillusionment - and independents thinking the birthers represented the GOP and were a bunch of delusional loonies. The White House putting out victory mugs and T-shirts with the document printed on them.
You can try to spin that as a “job well done” if you want.
You sound as delusional at Taitz doing so, but carry on......
And...If it did how could that be helpful to Obama?
Finally, I notice you are not arguing the facts I posts merely that you disagree with me that these facts could be revived as major issue and that it may or may not be important to Obama’s remaining in office.
Do you think what she is saying is ture or a misunderstanding of the meeting process?
Ya never know with Orly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.