Article, also # 1 , # 13 , # 20.
Thanks, Seizethecarp.
Posted on 11/20/2011 10:13:04 AM PST by Seizethecarp
Yesterday, four Republicans in the New Hampshire State House allowed a hearing requested by Orly Taitz, the notorious dentist-lawyer-birther who wants President Obama officially removed from the state's primary ballot.
So in honor of conspiracy theorists everywhere, we're re-releasing the campaign's limited-edition "Made in the USA" mugs.
There's clearly nothing we can do to satisfy this crowd—or anyone else who insists on wasting time and energy on nonsense like this.
But when it starts to make your head hurt, I've found the best remedy is to have some tea in my "Made in the USA" mug.
Works like a charm. I recommend Earl Grey.
The timing issue is connected, as you pointed out here, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2810132/posts?page=13#13
Article, also # 1 , # 13 , # 20.
Thanks, Seizethecarp.
How about a “Made in America” with 0bastard’s photo on it, but a chamber pot?
Or toilet seat?
Orly Taitz or anyone with (a) a foreign parent or (b) born on foreign soil Or both.
I was thinking.....
How bout a Coffee mug with a picture of Orly on one side and Obummer’s picture on the other side.
I think Obummers picture would look great with an egg cracked dripping from his head.
I could sell a ton of these MUGS!
obumpa
I was food shopping at Loblaws (Canadian grocer chain) on Monday and saw some heavy-duty, built-like-a-brick, glass coffee mugs, real beauties. Lo and behold, when I flipped one over....."Made in the USA" on the bottom. When was the last time you bought a mug that was made this side of the big pond? I put four of those babies in the cart. My TEA tastes much better now. There may be hope yet.
Seizethecarp wrote: “Obama only claims to have ‘released’ his original 1961 BC, but he has not actually legally done so.”
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia wrote: “The President released his long-form birth certificate on April 27, 2011, and posted a copy on the White House Web site. The certificate confirms the President’s birth in Honolulu, Hawaii.” [Taitz v Ruemmler 11-cv-421-RCL (2011)]
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia may have been content to accept the claims of Obama and HI DOH regarding the authenticity of the forged LFBC. But the Court did not actually have the LFBC before it in evidence.
Its ruling prevented a trial on the merits which could have subjected the original LFBC and any certified copies in the possession of the WH to forensic scrutiny.
The Obama Team may have gamed this out and (so far) correctly concluded that the full faith and credit would be given a fraudulent HI BC in federal court.
IIRC, all of Orly's claims were deemed to be based on mere suspicions and not sufficient for the DC Court to permit a trial on the merits.
Perhaps Joe Arpaio’s posse will turn up more conclusive evidence that Obama’s credentials are forged. We shall see.
Seizethecarp wrote: “Obama has never expressly legally released HI DOH to release a certified copy of his LFBC directly to any party”
That’s false. The correspondence is on the record from both sides and easy to Google. President Obama requested that the HI DOH make an exception to policy in order to release two certified copies of his long-form birth certificate to his legal counsel. He then, through his staff, publicly posted the document on the White House web site.
The HI DOH confirms: “On April 27, 2011 President Barack Obama posted a certified copy of his original Certificate of Live Birth.” The HI DOH links the White House web site, so there’s no question that they are confirming the image we’ve seen to be “a certified copy of his original Certificate of Live Birth.”
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/obama.html
Seizethecarp wrote: “The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia may have been content to accept the claims of Obama and HI DOH regarding the authenticity of the forged LFBC.”
The facts and the law played vastly differently in court than in your imagination, didn’t they?
Utter crap! (to quote Black Adder)
Obama fabricated “an exception to policy” with the collusion of HI DOH. No such HI policy ever existed and is contradicted by HI statute, as proved by FReeper Danae (see pages 226-228 of Corsi’s “Where's the Birth Certificate”).
Obama’s pretend “release” of his own record TO HIMSELF waives NO privacy right and DOES NOT constitute a legal release of his HI LFBC to anyone of a document that could be submitted in any court and proved up in evidence under the FRE (and challenged...that is the key point Obama is evading).
This alleged “release” by Obama is a sham.
“Obama fabricated ‘an exception to policy’ with the collusion of HI DOH. No such HI policy ever existed and is contradicted by HI statute, as proved by FReeper Danae (see pages 226-228 of Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate”).”
Ah, conspiracy. What more, the conspirators included both the Republican administration of Linda Lingle, and the Democratic administration of Neil Abercrombie. Did the reptilian humanoids replace all of them?
I did not say that Abercrombie/Lingle colluded with Obama to fabricate the LFBC/SFBC. That would be conspiracy. It may have happened, but that is not what I said.
What I said was:
“Obama fabricated ‘an exception to policy’ with the collusion of HI DOH. No such HI policy ever existed and is contradicted by HI statute, as proved by FReeper Danae (see pages 226-228 of Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate”).”
There was NO exception to policy. It is the EXCEPTION that was fabricated. This was buttressed by the slight-of-hand of making a great show of having Obama’s personal attorney fly all the way to HI to personally pick up the alleged certified copy of the alleged original LFBC.
Was this done to avoid using the US mail to send a forged document...a serious felony? Danae received her LFBC in the mail from HI DOH without obtaining an “exception to policy.”
As it stands now the photocopies of the WH LFBC and the blackberry image of one reporter are only inadmissible hearsay evidence of a true and correct certified copy of a 1961 original LFBC are are not a waiver of Obama’s right to privacy. It is that waiver of privacy which constitutes a “real” legal release as opposed to Obama fake limited hang-out non-release release.
Obama’s WH attorney went out of his way to insist that the so-called alleged original certified copy of the 1961 BC would NOT be handled by Obama at the April 27, 2011 press conference...providing plausible deniability to Obama of ever having personally vouching for or personally “releasing” anything other than an alleged photocopy of an alleged certified copy of an alleged “original” back in the HI vault.
No conspiracy at all here. Just flagrant manipulation of public perception.
[I had written:]Uh... so you deny claiming collusion as I had attributed to you, and also admit it? You might want to review what you and I wrote and look up the terms.Ah, conspiracy. What more, the conspirators included both the Republican administration of Linda Lingle, and the Democratic administration of Neil Abercrombie.I did not say that Abercrombie/Lingle colluded with Obama to fabricate the LFBC/SFBC. That would be conspiracy. It may have happened, but that is not what I said.What I said was: “Obama fabricated ‘an exception to policy’ with the collusion of HI DOH.
What I said was: “Obama fabricated ‘an exception to policy’ with the collusion of HI DOH.
HI DOH colluded with Obama to flat out lie to the public claiming as recently as the weekend before the non-release “release” that it was impossible for even the President of the United States to obtain a certified copy of his own LFBC from HI DOH. This lie had already been exposed by Danae and it was exposed for Obama on April 27, 2011.
That lie and Obama’s collusion with HI DOH in the lie is NOT conspiracy theory (unprovable claim of conspiracy), it is now a proved fact. Both Obama and the HI DOH and Lingle knew all the time that Obama could have obtained his own LFBC at any time.
That lie was foisted on the public by HI DOH and Obama (colluding) for two years until Trump, Corsi and Danae forced Obama’s hand.
Then Obama and HI DOH obviously colluded to pretend that Obama had been given an exception. That is not conspiracy theory, it is a fact as the lie that Obama couldn't obtain his own LFBC is obvious...to all but Obama’s apologists.
“What I said was: “Obama fabricated ‘an exception to policy’ with the collusion of HI DOH.”
Ah, conspiracy, just as I wrote. Any theories on how Obama got the Lingle administration to participate? Do the Illuminati actually control both of them?
Mes amis, even if you deny the incontrovertible DNA research to which I have devoted the past 7 decades, have you not noticed the regal bearing, the unconcern with the woes of the peasants, the royal lifestyle, etc.?
For us even to ask the question of legitimacy is absurd. Instead thank Allah for sending us His new messenger.
It is clear that there is no “conspiracy theory” (unprovable speculation) but rather a failed collusion in a lie. You may try to put words in my mouth that I am alleging “conspiracy” by Obama and the current Abercrombie Administration, but conspiracy is a legal term, unlike “conspiracy theory.”
Obama and Abercrombie's lawyers appear to me to have protected them from committing "legal conspiracy" in lying to the public. Politicians collude together to lie to the public all of the time without being charged with conspiracy.
Lingle is long gone and had nothing to do with the April 2011 collusion to fabricate an “exception to policy.” Lingle’s collusion with Obama was to jointly lie that there was a policy barring release of his own LFBC.
Abercrombie supported and continued that collusion up until April 27 when had allowed HI DOH officials to participate in the charade of having Okubo grant “a policy exception” just for Obama and only after receiving a request from Obama’s private attorney.
Were Obama, Lingle and Abercrombie telling the truth when they and their underlings claimed that Obama could not obtain his own LFBC from HI DoH?
No. Cased closed. They colluded in a lie.
Were Obama and Abercrombie and their underlings telling the truth when they claimed that an exception to HI policy had been created just for Obama AFTER the "release" of the LFBC?
No. Case closed. They colluded in a lie.
Again, I do not see indictable "conspiracy" here and there is no "conspiracy theory" because the collusion in a lie is a plain fact on the record.
What the WH released was a COPY of an ABSTRACT of data on allegedly file at the HI DOH. It was not a copy of a Birth Certificate, although the WH or someone took several stabs at making it look like one and would certainly like you to believe that it was.
The WH admittted that it was an "Abstract" in its earliest press release. Then, it just quietly let everyone assume that the document was a "Certified Copy of a Birth Certificate." It most certainly was not.
This is not rocket surgery. Ask a title company. When you close on real estate, both parties may agree that an "Abstract of Title" is sufficient. A wiser attorney might insist on a "Certified Copy of Title." The former may, or may not be complete. The latter must be. Or try handing an "Abstract" over to the DMV. They will straighten you out in a heartbeat, but I fear for your feelings.
This is no big deal. "A Certified Copy" is made on a copier, but then is notarized, or otherwise officially documented. This is what Joe Arpaio is asking for.
All a reasonable man can say is , "WTF is the problem? Copy the damned BC, notarize it, and fax it over." All of this "Sound and Fury" over a damned BC is to say the very least, damn suspicious. You know, maybe there ain't one. Why can't we look?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.