White House Seals Gun Smuggling Records

In a bid to end what he characterized as “merciless harassment that impedes my ability to carry out the policy of this Administration,” President Obama ordered all records pertaining to the murder of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry sealed.

“Attorney General Holder can’t work with someone second-guessing his every move,” Obama complained. “As long as I have a say he’ll get the privacy he needs. Those who don’t like it can try voting me out.”

http://azconserv1.wordpress.com/2011/12/03/white-house-threatens-to-cancel-congressional-holidays/

The Obama Administration has provided guns to Mexican drug gangs, engaged in money laundering and other illegal activities, committed perjury several times, concealed documents under subpoena and suborned perjury of lower level officials.

Now they are illegally refusing to provide documents that have been lawfully requested.

Immediately file appeals to the courts. Begin impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives. Immediately bring criminal charges against Holder, Napolitano and every one else who is involved.

The politicians have all taken an oath to uphold the Constitution. This is a clear case in which the Obama Administration has committed criminal acts and the Constitution has been violated. The politicians have a duty to do something about it.

Didn’t Reagan smuggle guns to Central America, Iran/Contra and all that? What’s the difference?

If you're too lazy to look up the difference between supporting a movement to restore democracy and giving weapons to drug lords in order to destroy the 2nd Amendment, I doubt that you'd understand the answer.

FWIW, Reagan never smuggled guns anywhere, but you'd have to have either lived through those times or have done some basic research to know that too.

“Didn’t Reagan smuggle guns to Central America, Iran/Contra and all that? What’s the difference?”

If you are too stupid to understand the difference then read a book, enroll in an elementary reading class or just STFU.

If you actually know they are totally different and are just trying to be immature and provocative then grow up.

“Giving weapons to drug lords”... Are you referencing Mexican drug lords or the Nicaraguan drug traffickers also known as the Contras?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_and_Contras_cocaine_trafficking_in_the_US

When our guy is in charge of CIA gun/drug runners then that is ok but when their guy is in charge of ATF gun running then that is suddenly out of bounds.

Or is the difference that gun running is ok when it is for “our” cause, of secretly negotiating w/ terrorists while supporting an insurgency, while gun running is wrong when it is for “their” cause of needing to justify more draconian regulations on the 2nd Amendment.

“Giving weapons to drug lords”... Are you referencing Mexican drug lords or the Nicaraguan drug traffickers also known as the Contras?

Learn your history, RC51, they were not drug traffickers. Maybe you should learn more about who the Sandinistas were and not from the left leaning Wikipedia. Sandinistas, members of a left-wing Nicaraguan political party, the Sandinist National Liberation Front (FSLN). The group, named for Augusto Cesar Sandino, a former insurgent leader, was formed in 1962 to oppose the regime of Anastasio Somoza Debayle. In 1979 the Sandinistas launched an offensive from Costa Rica and Honduras that toppled Somoza. They established a junta that nationalized such industries as banking and mining, postponed elections, and moved steadily to the left, eventually espousing Marxist-Leninist positions. The Sandinista-dominated government was opposed by U.S.-supported guerrillas known as contras Read more: Sandinistas — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0843413.html#ixzz1ft9pw8VN

The Iran-contra affair was the product of two separate initiatives during the administration of President Ronald Reagan. The first was a commitment to aid the contras who were conducting a guerrilla war against the Sandinista government of Nicaragua. The second was to placate “moderates” within the Iranian government in order to secure the release of American hostages held by pro-Iranian groups in Lebanon and to influence Iranian foreign policy in a pro-Western direction. Read more: Iran-contra affair — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0825447.html#ixzz1ft7fKWa7

As I told you before, you don't know what you are talking about. One might think that your off topic remark about Reagan was more to bash a great President than to make a point regarding a great piece of semi-satire.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.