Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Strength in Numbers: The REAL meaning of the Limbaugh Flap
grey_whiskers ^ | 03-05-2012 | grey_whiskers

Posted on 03/05/2012 9:05:03 PM PST by grey_whiskers

The saga of Sandra Fluke (Trojan Whorse) and Rush Limbaugh continues. Rush Limbaugh made a heartfelt apology on Saturday, apparently caving to pressure from advertisers who suspended or ceased advertising on his program. He continued on Monday, devoting approximately forty or forty-five minutes of his show, first to apologizing for using two derogatory words for Sandra Fluke -- because using them was sinking to the level of the left -- and the remainder of that time to providing timely background to her appearance before Pelosi.

As it turns out, the Democrats on Darrel Issa's committee considering mandatory provision of contraception / abortion by insurance companies on behalf of Catholic Institutions, wanted originally to provide Barry Lynn (Americans United for Separation of Church and State) as a witness; at the last minute, the night before the hearing, Sandra Fluke was proposed as a substitute witness. The Republicans in charge of the committee declined; so Pelosi set up an opportunity for Fluke to parade her script as though it were testimony before the whole committee.

Since that point, and since Rush Limbaugh's apology, an number of interesting things have happened.

But the most interesting thing of all, is contained in this piece from ABC News attempting to gloat at what is fervently hoped to be a body blow to the Rush Limbaugh program (someone reading this article, please save the webpage for posterity in case they try to take it down the memory hole):

The companies' often short statements posted to Twitter, Facebook and corporate blogs have already received an outpouring of comments. More than 1,100 people "liked" AOL's decision within three hours of it being posted on Facebook. And while Carbonite has less than one-tenth as many Facebook fans as AOL, more than 4,600 people have "liked" or commented on its decision to withdraw their ads since it was posted on Saturday.

The progressive activist group Credo action collected more than 360,000 signatures in an online petition calling for all national advertisers to pull their support from Limbaugh's show.

What is the significance of this? This is the penultimate example: a set up of Rush Limbaugh, a *rare* case where he did not tread carefully, and legitimately issued a *real* apology for his words. Right in the middle of the astroturfing Axelrod and dictatorial wannabe Cass Sunstein's turf, on a topic *sacramental* to the left: abortion rights and funding!

And Glory be to Gaia, it appears it was coordinated in advance with the press (remember the Stephanopoulos questions?), the Dems in Congress (Pelosi), Media Matters, and for all we know, select liberal advertisers and pressure groups.

This was a hanging curveball, right in their wheelhouse.

And what do we find?

1,100 people "liking" a faceboook page on this topic from Carbonite.

3,600 people "liking" a similar facebook page from AOL.

And a liberal group, in a MASSIVE online campaign, captures 360,000 people in a petition to condemn Rush.

Sounds impressive, right?

Except for one...tiny...little...thing.

Rush has 20 MILLION listeners a week.

360,000 is less than 2% of that -- and all they had to do was click a couple times on their computer: not listen for three hours a day.

There is STRENGTH IN NUMBERS.

OUR NUMBERS.



We are ALL Andrew Breitbart.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: alinsky; limbaugh; limbaughfirestorm; mediamatters; sandrafluke; sandytheslut; silentmajority; whiskersvanity
FORTH EORLINGAS!
1 posted on 03/05/2012 9:05:07 PM PST by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

What I’d like to know is why a man that usually relies so heavily on facts didn’t bother to READ what was being touted as ‘testimony’ though it really wasn’t.

Why didn’t he read it first!?


2 posted on 03/05/2012 9:13:15 PM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; neverdem; SunkenCiv; Cindy; LucyT; decimon; freedumb2003; ...
"Polly wanna condom" birdcage *PING*.

BTW, posting past my bedtime, the obligatory typo: in the bottom section, I switched Carbonite and AOL, and substituted 3,600 for 4,600.

Obviously a right-wing conspiracy on my part.

Cheers!

3 posted on 03/05/2012 9:13:30 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I am Breitbart! Ride Sons of Eorl!

I admonish you to keep your hearth warm, and your powder dry;-)


4 posted on 03/05/2012 9:15:01 PM PST by SgtBob (Freedom is not for the faint of heart. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Pelosi set up an opportunity for Fluke to parade her script as though it were testimony before the whole committee...I'm betting about five times as many in the general public found Fluke's whining about having birth control paid for by others offensive and even repulsive as found it acceptable or admirable - and no one would have ever heard it had Limbaugh not called her a "slut" - he may be vindicated yet.....
5 posted on 03/05/2012 9:17:03 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; tomdavidd; Freeper; Gvl_M3; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
6 posted on 03/05/2012 9:20:19 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
New word for the urban dictionary like Lewinski ... a Fluke aka trollop
7 posted on 03/05/2012 9:20:39 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
OBAMAGUARD, GOVERNMENT MANDATED CONTRACEPTIVES IN ACTION
8 posted on 03/05/2012 9:23:19 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

If you think that Limabugh didn’t know what he was doing you are delusional.


9 posted on 03/05/2012 9:27:54 PM PST by svcw (Only difference between Romney & BH is one thinks he will be god & other one thinks he already is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; grey_whiskers; ProgressingAmerica

“Sandra Fluke has invited people to look at “Media Matters” for more examples of over-the-top right-wing rhetoric. Oh, you mean like calling Sarah Palin a C*nt like Bill Maher did? Media Matters is the leftist-of-the-left: this is beginning to smell like an orchestrated campaign; not only to shore up Obama’s poll numbers with a reliably gullible demographic (they’ll swallow anything as Bill Clinton learned), but also to try to take out a powerful unifying voice for conservatism before the election.”

And who funds Media Matters ?

George Soros.

How does he fund it ?

Through the Open Society Institute.

Who else funds the Open Society ?

I do! You do! We all do! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the US government has given the OSI funding.

BTTT!


10 posted on 03/05/2012 9:37:02 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Thank you so much for your wonderful essays, dear grey-whiskers!


11 posted on 03/05/2012 9:45:03 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Yes, he deliberately set out to lose a dozen sponsors. /s


12 posted on 03/05/2012 9:51:23 PM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

The line forms to the right for advertisers willing to take their place.


13 posted on 03/05/2012 9:52:07 PM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I’ve no doubt that he will replace them. I just wonder why he didn’t address the lies in the fake testimony instead of focusing on Fluke when she wasn’t even talking about herself. He could have accomplished so much more by exposing her lies.


14 posted on 03/05/2012 9:56:11 PM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Thanks for the inspiration grey_whiskers...

OBAMAS TROJAN, OBAMA'S TROJAN
15 posted on 03/05/2012 10:08:12 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

bttt


16 posted on 03/05/2012 10:19:24 PM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Rush should never, ever have apologized.

The ONLY response the Left EVER has to an apology is to crow “it changes nothing”!

It’s merely an opportunity for them to rub your face into something THEY set up, and then declare what you did was so heinous that it would literally go against morality to forgive you - i.e. zero tolerance in the name of protecting tolerance.

The Left is VILE. That is Rule 1.

If they serve up global peace, universal happiness, and eternal life, just remember Rule 1, and you won’t be fooled.

They mean to destroy everyone - it’s their only goal.

And hijacking Every Good Thing is their number one modus operandi.

What do they want? What the Muslims want - that’s why they get along.

A dead planet.


17 posted on 03/05/2012 10:20:32 PM PST by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Rush took what was an excellent opportunity to make a strong point about big government intruding on religious liberty and turned it into a sophomoric social conservative's name-calling session. But as he says, talking about the social issues helps Republicans.

Sure, Rush, especially when you do it with as much warmth and finesse as you and Sineater Santorum.

18 posted on 03/05/2012 10:44:49 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

RUSH: - Republicans are say, “We’ve got to stop talking about this abortion stuff. We gotta stop talking about contraception.” It is the Democrats who are obsessed with this stuff! Why can’t our people go on offense? Why can’t our people say, “It’s the Democrats who are obsessed with all of these social issues”? Look: “Maryland Gay Marriage Bill to Governor’s Desk.” That’s not a social issue, gay marriage? We have a federal judge this week in San Francisco who ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act, signed by Bill Clinton, is unconstitutional. He just took it upon himself to say that a piece of legislation is unconstitutional. Defending traditional values is not modern? It’s off topic? Attacking them is modern and good politics?

That’s what we’re to believe here? All we’re doing is defending traditional values. All we’re doing is defending the institutions and the traditions that have made this country great, and apparently that’s what you’re not supposed to do? “No, no, don’t do that! Mr. Limbaugh, you’re just gonna make people nervous. Women aren’t going to understand.” You wouldn’t believe the e-mails. “Rush, women’s brains can’t compute this way. You’re making a big mistake here just by bringing this up.” Oh, so we can’t defend all these great traditions, but the left can attack them? The left can attack them and rip them apart and tear them down, and that’s good politics? Is that what we’re to believe?

We’re supposed to sit by while great traditions and institutions like marriage are ripped to shreds. Obama just, as a dictator would, demands that contraception be free and paid for. He can’t do that! We’re supposed to not say a word because “Obama’s on the right side, here. That’s good politics” We conservatives are on defense on these matters. We’re not trying to change the world. We’re trying to preserve it! I’m just gonna tell you: For all of you friends and not who are telling me to leave this stuff alone, please take it somewhere else. If you don’t have the desire to defend this stuff, then don’t get mad at me, because I do. Because I am not gonna join the side of this that says, “The good politics, the smart politics, the side of this you want to be on politically is to tear down these traditions and institutions.”

I am not going there. I’m not gonna go there to attract a larger audience. I’m not gonna go there to avoid criticism. We’re not the ones that issued the rule violating the First Amendment. They did! We didn’t go to federal court to impose our will and to claim that the will of the people is unconstitutional. They did! We are not the ones doing social experiments with the US military. They are! And yet we’re divisive? We’re anti-modern? We’re unfocused? We’re old-fashioned? We’re racist, sexist, bigot homophobes? I’m sorry, I am not gutless. And, by the way, I discussed economic issues and every other aspect of Obama long before anybody else got to the table. While everybody else was afraid to be critical of Obama, I was not.


19 posted on 03/05/2012 11:04:46 PM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anglian

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/02/24/we_fear_for_our_country_governor_bush


20 posted on 03/05/2012 11:06:40 PM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

21 posted on 03/05/2012 11:45:09 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
We are all Breitbart

.

22 posted on 03/05/2012 11:47:55 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; grey_whiskers
Thanks for the Ping.

GW: That is one righteous post!

A thought or two:

If Limbaugh has been avoiding weighing in without reservation on the bs "Barack Obama" birth and life narrative simply for fear of provoking an incendiary backlash from the left (and of losing advertisers), it would appear that he has forgotten a very important fact: The Left want to destroy him anyway, and will use any pretext to do so. It's not like their waiting around to pounce when he dares mention "birther" concerns. They're lying (heh) in wait anyway, for anything they can get their hands on to use as a weapon.

He's got his very own research team, for pete's sake! You think he doesn't know, or at least have the ability to be informed of, in great detail, all of the crap dead-ends and false trails surrounding the "history" of this man sitting in the White House? Why won't he at least talk about the maddeningly unverifiable (documentarily) much of anything in Barry's past?

I'll say the same thing about him as I said about Rick Perry who collapsed like a cheap suit shortly after bringing the issue up: He has enough stature that if he were to raise the subject, and was actually knowledgeable on it, he could force the conversation nationally.

I like Rush and think that he will come through this tempest in a teapot just fine. I also think he's either making a mistake in not talking about all the malarkey that has gone on in support of installing, and keeping installed, this fraud, or else there is more going on.

There was a bomb scare at his house the same day that Joe Arpaio's CCP released their first results, and the same day that Andrew Breitbart died of "natural causes" at 43, hours after talking with Sheriff Joe. Say, wasn't March 1st a day that Andrew had said to watch for? Come to think of it, wasn't March 1st 1971 the day that Billy Ayers' group bombed the Pentagon?

Hmmm.

23 posted on 03/06/2012 12:52:41 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; LucyT
And a liberal group, in a MASSIVE online campaign, captures 360,000 people in a petition to condemn Rush.

Rush Limbaugh
About
The Official Facebook Page of America's Anchorman
1,037,985 like this
35,945 talking about this

Sounds impressive, right?

Kind of like the signatures in the Scott Walker recall. The numbers sound impressive, except that even if you include the phony signatures that were submitted, the total number is still only a fraction of the number of people that voted for Scott Walker in the general election!

From FOX News: The rush to censor Limbaugh

So why are the Left and the media still pushing and publicizing a campaign for advertisers to dump the Limbaugh show and end his career?

Because it has little to do with his words. This is all about disingenuous politics. Liberals want this government-mandate controversy to be not about religious liberty, which is devastating, but about contraceptives, which works in their favor.

That is intellectually dishonest.

They want to position conservatives as “anti-women.” That’s as ugly as it is untrue.

Everyone remembers Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a “slut” on his radio show.

Fellow talk show host Mike Malloy hoped Sarah Palin “drives herself into madness” and insisted Michele Bachmann is an “evil bitch from Hell” who would have gladly supervised the Holocaust.

Montel Williams rooted on Air America for Bachmann to slit her own wrist or throat.

Randi Rhodes insisted that teenage boys weren’t safe from Palin’s advances if they stayed over at her house. There’s no news coverage or “war on women” narrative when the mud-covered women are conservatives.

Maybe these hosts aren’t prominent enough?

Then consider the case study of Bill Maher, who’s welcomed all over TV news shows.

A year ago on his HBO show, he called Sarah Palin a “dumb twat.”

He followed up days later in a Dallas stand-up routine by calling Palin the C-word.

Last July on HBO, he said Palin was “a bully who sells patriotism like a pimp, and the leader of a strange family of inbred weirdos.”

Last September on his show, Maher said Palin would have sex with Rick Perry if he was black.

Days after he called Palin the T-word, he appeared with then-CNN host Eliot Spitzer, where Spitzer concluded, “Your show is brilliant. I love watching it.”

On Sunday, Democratic Party chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz huffed on “Meet the Press” that "I don't know any woman in America that thinks that being called a slut is funny." But two months ago, she accepted an invitation to sit on the set with the man who called Palin a “c---.”

A couple of years ago, “comedian” Louis CK “joked” on the Opie and Anthony radio show about Palin coming to the Republican convention “holding a baby that just came out of her f-ing, disgusting [C-word], her f-ing retard-making [C-word]. I hate her more than anybody,” he said.

On Twitter, this “comedian” attacked Palin in 2011 as a “f—ing jackoff [C-word]-face jazzy wondergirl” who “has a family of Chinese poor people living in her [C-word] hole.”

Guess which event this same fellow is headlining in June? -- The Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner.

WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE?!?!?


24 posted on 03/06/2012 1:48:35 AM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

; )

25 posted on 03/06/2012 4:41:57 AM PST by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; Anoreth
FORTH EORLINGAS!

I think I'm too repressed to be Breitbart ... but I'm the mother of more than one!

26 posted on 03/06/2012 5:21:55 AM PST by Tax-chick (Maybe it IS about contraception. Read "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" decision, 1992.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw; Netizen
"If you think that Limabugh didn’t know what he was doing you are delusional."

EXACTLY

MORE

MORE

bttt

27 posted on 03/06/2012 7:36:48 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("Andrew loved the battle and he knew the stakes." ~ Mark Levin 3/2/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
"I just wonder why he didn’t address the lies in the fake testimony instead of focusing on Fluke when she wasn’t even talking about herself. He could have accomplished so much more by exposing her lies."

If he did just that, there would be no "flap" about it.

Look at all the information coming out about her now.

He probably knew there would be a great fall out, hence his Thursdays program digging in his heels further.

28 posted on 03/06/2012 7:38:04 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I just finished that book.
Eomer was really hot in the movies.


29 posted on 03/06/2012 9:57:02 AM PST by Anoreth (It's not stupid, it's advanced!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Anoreth

And that is the truth - one of the parts that Giant Ego Peter Jackson didn’t mess up.

We watched “Monte Walsh” the other night. Apparently Tom Selleck said, “I feel like making a movie ... let’s go out to Canada for some really spectacular scenery, have a lot of people ride around on fine horses, and invite all my friends to take parts. Oh, what ... we need a plot? Freep that ...”.


30 posted on 03/06/2012 10:19:42 AM PST by Tax-chick (Maybe it IS about contraception. Read "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" decision, 1992.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson