SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO SAYS CRIMINAL FRAUD In Obama Birth Certificate AND Selective Service Card

www.webtoday.tv ^ | 03/09/2012 | WebToday.tv

[geraldmcg]

An investigative “Cold Case Posse” begun in 2011 by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County concluded during a March 1, 2012 news conference that there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery!

Analyst Steve Beaman, a number crunching genius who sold one of his companies to Charles Schwab that is now known as the Schwab Equity Rating, is available to discuss the political and economic implications of such high profile allegations.

Beaman explains how investigators did conducted their analysis. He says that the register stamp and date stamp in government documents are safety features to verify the authenticity of their documents. But the fact that those stamps on documents purported by Obama as being genuine were actually imported from outside sources showing with certainty that it was fraudulent...

[eyedigress]

Sheriff Arpaio believes this to be a congressional matter and would like for the citizens to demand it. He has provided probable cause in his opinion. He is asking for heat on representatives from us. Have you done anything?

[MikeSteelBe]

“What if the founding fathers had that same thought? Evil only win when good men do nothing.”

My point was that the founding fathers DID accept the reality of the situation. There came a point when the founding fathers accepted the fact that the soapbox and ballot box were no longer viable means of securing liberty and justice for the people.

The original seal of the US said “Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God.”

http://www.greatseal.com/committees/firstcomm/reverse.html

[HoneysuckleTN]

Thanks for that link.

[MasterGunner01]

And speaking of FRAUD, what about Obama’s multiple Social Security Numbers and the fact he's using one that belongs to a dead man? Just a thought.

[STARWISE]

Thanks. I’ve had nagging ambivalent feelings about her.

[STARWISE]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yerPzQ4doyU

[LucyT]

[Fred Nerks]

The “date filed” and BC# for Obama’s forged BC would fit the exact circumstances of Virginia’s birth and death but not for anybody else, since her death certificate used a different name than her birth certificate and the HDOH would thus have had to ascertain from the hospital and/or family which name was the correct one before numbering the BC, after initially stamping a filing date for what they thought was a complete, no-problem BC.

They can't release the birth certificate for Virginia Sunahara because the number that corresponds with her date of birth isn't available any longer...someone else has got the number...and they gave Virginia a number amended on the 29 of August, two weeks after her birth, and a number that's more than 400 in the future from her birth...so if there isn't a Tomyio Sunahara at number 10641 there can only be one answer...

[DrDude]

Why not get Virginia’s brother on talk shows. It would be cheaper and quicker than dragging thru a fixed court. The only people that know about this issue are FRs and bloggers. No one has the juice to get this on cABLE tv or even radio? Nothing has to be said about the tie to Obama’s BC. Just that Ha. refuses to give up Virginia’s BC. I bet the attention would help. IMHO

[snafubar]

I registered on 8/28/1980 in Connecticut.

Obama (supposedly) registered on 7/29/1980, (supposedly) in Hawaii, one month before I did.

He (supposedly) registered BEFORE I did. My number is LOWER than his. I’m not sure of the significance or how the numbers are assigned.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Brewer needs to show us who she really is. She must NOT be allowed to hide herself from the facts.”

Brewer didn’t even want to sign SB1070. She is looking out for #1. She doesn’t want to get facts.

[Paperdoll]

this investigation was done on his own time. Please send him healthy contributions.

[MHGinTN]

Look at the visual in post #48 ... look on the far right at the hand written in number supposedly assigned to Virginia Sunahara. THAT is the number HI will not allow verification for, probably because her original number is now being used by the criminal-in-chief whom HI is protecting at all costs because HI is complicit in his criminal fraud.

[MHGinTN]

On the far left of the visula ... my mistake.

[The Cajun]

That really verifies a Hawaiian state government conspiracy about 99.999% for me.

What other conclusion can be drawn?

[visually_augmented]

bigbob:”and unless he can do something about it prima facie, i.e. that a fraudulent document was submitted in response to a state law or something”

Not sure if you are aware, but Obama’s attorney in Georgia submitted the fraudulent LFBC to the Georgia Secretary of State as proof of elgibility. It isn’t completely clear if this was “entered as evidence” under the rules of a court, but it certainly was identified as proof.

I believe there have been other instances in other states where Obama’s representatives have at the very least mentioned the LFBC that was presented in April 2011 as legitimate proof of his birth in Hawaii.

[visually_augmented]

snafubar:”He (supposedly) registered BEFORE I did. My number is LOWER than his. I’m not sure of the significance or how the numbers are assigned.”

I had heard that all SSS applications where sent to Illinois for processing (how coincidental). So it would be a question of when the forms were collected in a particular state and sent for processing in Illinois. But since we know Obama has forged his, it all seems somewhat irrelevant.

The best data for comparison would be to get other Hawaii submissions from the same time period as Obama’s.

[Fred Nerks]

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/update-on-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html

case dismissed