Cert of birth no. 32018, of Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, British Protectorate, Kenya

coachisright.com ^ | MARCH 12TH, 2012 | George Spelvin, staff writer

[jmaroneps37]

A “certificate of birth, certificate no. 32018, of Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya, for a child bearing the name of Barack Hussein Obama II Sex M” is on the internet at http://i3.ytimg.com/bg/jKZugoOaaREqEyqKIzGDVw/102.jpg.

This certificate states the child was born to “Stanley Ann Obama (which is) full name of Mother (with the) maiden surname Dunham,” and she was born on 11/29/1942.” The full name of the Father is Barack Hussein Obama with only the year of his birth given as 1936.

His birth place is listed as Kanyadhiang Village, Nyanza, and the occupations of both mother and father are listed as “student.” The mother’s residence is listed as Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, and her birth place is named as Wichita, Kansas, United States.

The date of the baby’s birth is named as “4th day of August, 1961 at 7:24 pm. ” The weight of child at birth is listed as 7 pounds 1 ounce with length of 18 inches and width between shoulders as 6 inches.”

The name of the attending doctor is “James O. W. Ang’awa” who signed and dated the certificate of birth on 8/8/1961, four days after the birth.

The name of the Supervisor of Obstetrics is John Kwame Odongo who signed and dated the document on 8-7-1961. A footprint of a right foot is in the lower left side of this document. The seal in the upper left hand side contains “Helton Maganga chief Administrator.”

This document stands alone on the web, without anyone owning up to even putting it there. But as the evidence continues to pile up, its authenticity needs to be examined with the same forensic detail to which Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation subjected the document which the White House put up…….

[woofie]

here is a question for you ......the sheriff in Arizona stuck his neck out and called Obama’s papers a fraud.

Why if there is any validity to Smith’s opus, did he not mention it?

something else ....why call people “Obots” if they dont buy Smith and his magic Kenyan paper? It is way too easy to be against both Obama and Smith ....I would say they are cut from the same cloth

[Peter Libra]

It is way too easy to be against both Obama and Smith..... I would say they are cut from the same cloth.

It hardly seems like nearly two years ago when Lucas Daniel Smith appeared with his "birth certificate". An incredible response from Freepers was received, as you will remember. He appeared with a clip board and the said document. He was surrounded by healthy little lads of Carribean appearance, all smiling and interested in this goings on.

It was claimed this man Smith wanted to give the impression it was in Africa where the video was shot. People said it was possibly in the Dominican Republic. He jerked the clip board around and back around again. One could get dizzy. Someone froze it for us.

I went back to youtube and could only get an updated version of the birth certificate so called. Smith was well rehearsed and very authoritative.

As Ïnspector Smith, he became a Freeper. In June 2010 he was removed or zotted. I wasted hours and hours trying to out guess the man. I know he does not want to get into a court and be held to any sworn statement, simply having to swear whether he had ever been in Kenya. That he has sworn some sort of affidavit and conceded he could spend hard time in jail, if he lied is true. Persons with legal training said the affidavit had to be notarized first before he could be held to account.

[Seizethecarp]

“something else ....why call people “Obots” if they dont buy Smith and his magic Kenyan paper?”

I called “an Obot” the person who corrupted the Wiki date format page to remove proof that Kenya used two date formats, one of which matched the CPGH BC. He/she is an Obama operative robot, i.e. Obot, IMO.

I have no complaint about folks who disagree with me, other than concern trolls who lurk on eligibility threads and want to “help” others see that the troll knows the truth and others don't.

I remain agnostic regarding the CPGH BC absent forensic examination or proof of forgery which I don't see, yet.

Note that several months ago LDS claimed that he had been offered a much higher resolution scan of a CPGH BC and he was in some kind of negotiations to obtain it, IIRC.

He posted a partial scan that included part of the footprint and parts of several signatures that were identical to the LDS scan...but where, in fact, at much higher resolution. The little folds and grooves of the footprint were much clearer and more suitable for ID, should that be possible.

I wasn't following site very closely and I have heard no word that LDS obtained the better scan or that the full scan was ever put up anywhere, but that might just be the scan the triggered this thread...before it disappeared!

Here's another guess: The scan came from Odinga's top aide and is now in the possession of Jerome Corsi...and maybe Arpaio's Posse, now that you mention it. Arpaio has been extremely careful not to reveal anything too soon. Arpaio would know that an alleged CPGH BC scan or actual embossed certificate can ONLY be authenticated by the corrupt Kenyan government in order to be entered into evidence in federal court and Obama can outbid anybody to bribe the Kenyans to hide or reveal it. Leaking a high quality scan onto the web briefly could be a warning to Barry's team of things to come.

[LucyT]

Back to the thread.

Check out # 48 , # 99 , # 102.

Thanks, Seizethecarp.

[Seizethecarp]

Catching up with the thread and the links at the site at the top of the thread it appears that the image being discussed is the same one from several years ago and not the newer higher resolution scan that was partially disclosed by LDS several months back...perhaps because that was all that the seller was willing to show him.

Looking at the immigration case up-thread where an ID was made of an adult using a baby footprint, I think it is possible that an ID could be made of Obama’s foot using the newer higher resolution scan of the CPGH BC (not likely a print could be obtained without warrant).

[rolling_stone]

Uh methinks he could be prosecuted for perjury if indeed perjury was proven...

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=4156
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1746

[superfries]

Not sure if your rationale is a good one here.....just because the Brits said it was a protected area doesn’t mean that the hospitals used British colony language on their BC’s.

[superfries]

Nice find on the protectorate

[Seizethecarp]

Here is the higher resolution footprint and two partial signature loops that match the lower resolution CPGH BC posted on this thread. It looks good enough for an ID to an adult foot, such as Barry's in my non-professional assessment. LDS claims that only this much was shown to him as part of a negotiation. LDS doesn't seem to say, yet, what happened with the negotiation.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/71212093/1961-footprint-of-Barack-Hussein-Obama-II

The inclusion of the two loops in the frame of the image matching the LDS BC in his CA court affidavit suggests that a higher resolution scan of the entire CPGH BC exists (in someone else’s possession, if you believe LDS) and this is NOT just an isolated image of a footprint which was the source for the lower resolution image and somehow pasted into and the source of the LDS image as part of a forgery.

No authentication of any of either CPGH BC image (full or partial) is yet possible. But

[rolling_stone]

best location for ridges is big toe and ball of foot.

flexure creases:
http://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/footcreases.html

....Previous Research

The premise that nature does not repeat itself is the basis for forensic identification. We accept that each person’s features have their own unique configuration. Research has been done in relation to friction ridges, ear prints, and footprints [1- 4]. In anticipation of the court case, a review of the literature turned up no previous cases in which foot creases had been used for identification. In the area of research, few studies have been done, and most are in relation to infants and do not consider persistence.

In 1959, Blake [5] researched the individualizing power of foot creases, utilizing the footprints of 1,388 infants. He concluded that “the creases are individual to each foot and no two feet are alike and they remain constant after birth” [5]. No indication was given as to how long these infants were followed to establish the persistence of the creases.

In work done in 1979, Taylor [6] stated that creases should only be used as an alternative to friction ridge identification, because he claimed to have found similar crease structure in two different infants. However, the creases on the footprints shown in his article do not seem similar in shape.

Bali’s Anthropology of Crease Morphogenesis: A Scientific Analysis [7] deals specifically with crease morphology and has a chapter on foot creases; however, the author focuses on the classification of the creases on the basis of shape and location on the foot, as opposed to the permanence and individualizing power of them.

Lohnes [8] refers to Blake’s research in a 1986 article in which he states, “Flexure creases are unique and remain constant during the first few weeks of life. They do not change in direction or distance from each other. As a child continues to grow, there is a gradual change in size, shape and quantity of flexure creases.”.......

[WildHighlander57]

Six toes

:0

[WildHighlander57]

Six toes

:0

[MHGinTN]

Conman fiction

[rolling_stone]

http://www.google.com/search?q=people+with+6+toes&hl=en&rlz=1R2PRFB_enUS462&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&tbm=isch&ei=XuxeT_qYBaSl2AXy_uyaCA&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=661

[Fresh Wind]

I extracted the cover page from that otherwise boring 1957 document downloaded from a library in the Netherlands which proves that the designation "Protectorate of Kenya" was legitimate at that time.

[Jim Noble]

The “Protectorate of Kenya” refers to the coastal strip, including Mombasa, which was under the sovereignty of the Sultan of Zanzibar but also under British protection until 1963, when the “colony” and the “protectorate” were merged as independent Kenya.

[aruanan]

The weight of child at birth is listed as 7 pounds 1 ounce with length of 18 inches and width between shoulders as 6 inches.”

I see his shoulders have remained about the same width.

[aruanan]

Soetoro is the name of his mom’s Indonesian husband.

Soetoro is the name of his adoptive father. In order to have Barry Soetoro's name on official documents in Indonesia, Barry would have been adopted. And in order for his mother to have married Lolo, she would have had to renounce her U.S. citizenship.

[Fresh Wind]

Correct. There was some question as to whether “Protectorate of Kenya”, or more specifically “British Protectorate of Kenya” would have appeared on official documents at that time (post-1920 and pre-1963). There don’t seem to be any maps that show that coastal strip as a separate entity. This document eliminates that particular objection to the authenticity of the alleged Kenyan BC.

[Eye of Unk]

I can just imagine some people are writing up a subpoena for Obamas footprints in ink.

I bet that the Brits MI6 is under pressure keeping the witness to Obamas birth in a safe hiding spot as well.

Yes thats right, and the first Wookie knows all about it.

Answers the question why the Obamas treat the Royals with so much poo doo.