Skip to comments.DUmmie FUnnies 05-29-12 (Debbie Does Dullness: Wasserman Weasels on Wisconsin)
Posted on 05/29/2012 6:30:28 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson
DNC Spinmeistress Debtie Wassername Shills
DNC SpokesDuNCe Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been using weasel words to speak about the upcoming Wisconsin recall election. Wasserman Schultz (apparently her hyphen is broken) is in a Dem dilemma. On the one hand, Debbie's got to put on a happy face about their chances in Wisconsin and the glorious nationwide victory that that will portend for November. On the other hand, privately, Debbie knows the Democrats are losing Wisconsin and are in big trouble for November. So now when she has to speak about the significance of the Wisconsin recall election, Wasserman is trying to cover her wass.
What is Debbie to do? Should Wassername Shills sound enthusiastic and excited about Wisconsin? Or should the Spinmeistress downplay the recall election, in case the Rethugs win? And should the Head DuNCe pour money into a losing cause? If she doesn't, she'll hear it from the progs and the union bosses.
Then there's the national aspect of this. If the Dems lose Wisconsin in June, it will not bode well for them in November. Debtie knows she'll have a hard time selling the Debtocrats and Baroke Obama this fall.
So Debbie is caught between Barack and a hard place. This is why Wasserman is weaseling on Wisconsin.
The DUmmies, true to form, are blaming Debbie for this mess. She's too centrist, too dull, too tepid and timid. That's the standard explanation for all Democrat failure, i.e., not being radical-left progressive enough. As we see in this THREAD, "Debbie Wasserman Schultz: There Arent Going To Be Any Repercussions If Walker Wins In Wisconsin."
So let us now watch the DUmmies drub Debbie, in Recall Red, while the commentary of your humble guest correspondent, Charles Henrickson, wondering when the Democrats will recall HER, is in the [brackets]:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: There Arent Going To Be Any Repercussions If Walker Wins In Wisconsin
[Translation: "We're going down in flames, but I've got to pretend things are looking up for November."]
Its an election thats based in Wisconsin. Its an election that I think is important nationally because Scott Walker is an example of how extreme the tea party has been when it comes to the policies that they have pushed the Republicans to adopt, Wasserman Schultz said. But I think itll be, at the end of the day, a Wisconsin-based election. . . .
[Debbie Does Doublespeak.]
Get her THE F*** out of that position. . . . how can she make a stupid statement like that?
[She's a Democrat. She's STUCK on stupid.]
If the folks in Wisconsin don't know the stakes in this election and re-elect that scumbag, they get what they deserve. And, no, the world will continue to spin. . . .
[As will Debbie.]
Rachel Maddow . . . might be a better choice for that position.
[Rachel likes to be on top.]
Sometimes I really wonder about Debbie, is she just clueless, or is it something else?
[To ask the question is to answer it.]
We need to see her eat her words!
[The taste of weasel, on both sides of her mouth.]
Even Cher, a supporter of Wasserman, tweeted her last week, saying if she did not get involved, she would lose respect for her.
[And the tweet goes on . . . the tweet goes on . . .]
It means heads are gonna roll in Wisconsin Dem circles.
[Cheeseheads will roll.]
It means we need HOWARD DEAN back.
she's got her head up her ass. Saying this means nothing???????
[Actually, she's covering her wass.]
Debbie does - something or other. Disappointment for one thing.
[Debbie Does Dullness.]
she's been a TOTAL disappointment. Utterly useless.
Can we throw her out, early, if Wisconsin goes down? Or are we stuck with her through the end of her DNC term?
[Start a petition and have a recall election.]
Jesus Debbie...Sometimes I think the moose in your hair sinks into your brain.
[I thought it was Palin that had moose in her hair.]
That is mousse not moose. . . . Personally I think she has Bat Sh*t in her hair.
"moose"? As in Bullwinkle?
[No, dahlink, as in "mousse and curl."]
I'm a little less impressed every time she speaks.
[But what about her hair? Isn't that impressive?]
If the Democratic Party can't be effective in Wisconsin, where can they succeed?
[France. Go there.]
What an idiot. How the hell did she become head of the DNC?
["Idiot" was one of the boxes on the application.]
The DNC is useless.
She's f***ing delussional!
f*** her.... she's another phony democrat. . . .
[DNCing With The Slurs.]
What are you on, Debbie? And can I have some?
[Debbie Does Doobies.]
Debbie "Mousse and Curl" Wasserman Schultz
With a tip o' the hat to Libloather for suggesting this thread.
(Doing my best Sam Kinison) Oh Oh OOOOHHHH!
Git that skanky woman off my screen!
Top ten I think although FR is sooooo slow.
I’m no longer using mousse having changed to Curl Diva which is a system of four applications starting with NO PU which is the main reason I use it - the name of the non-shampoo.
Mousse? I thought that was Mayo.
Top 10 as usual.
I wish Debbie would come to my house. My grill needs cleaning.
Having ditzy Debbie as the face of the DNC is the best thing to happen to the Republicans in decades. As for her hair, my bet is on Italian dressing, not mousse (or moose, either, for that matter...).
“Can we throw her out, early, if Wisconsin goes down? Or are we stuck with her through the end of her DNC term?
[Start a petition and have a recall election.] “
LOL That one’s worth the price of admission. :)
I wouldn’t use that to clean my grill. Too abrasive, and I’ve got a nice carbon buildup on my grates. I’ll stick with the brass wire brush.
I guess I don’t understand the liberals.
They are the ones who initiated this whole dam recall thing in Wisconsin in the first place. They spent many millions of dollars and a lot of time, getting this recall going.
So, how can they now say that there’s no real significance to this recall election? If the recall doesn’t really matter, then why in the sam hill did they do this?
Based on previous statements, you would have sworn that the very future of the nation depends on defeating Walker and his conservative policies of having public unions pay more for healthcare and retirement.
So which is it? Does the future of the republic hinge on defeating Walker or not???????
You are correct, sir!
Oh, you're asking for it now! More of Debbie Wasserman Mousse:
Debbie Washerhair Mousse.
The face of the Democrat party.
And an ugly one for sure.
That is mousse not moose, because the moose bit Debbie. Moose bites can be very nasty....
Debbie generally comes off in public speaking as if there's a screw or two loose upstairs.
BTW, the LA Times had a piece yesterday, using Debbie to make the point that the Dems are pretty much giving up on the Wisconsin recall election. When their cheerleading friends in the media say that kind of stuff, you know they're hurting.
I think she’d clean up OK.
On the outside, that is.
The inside, well, there’s not much prospect of that.
That depends. If Walker is defeated, then the effort would be a huge success, and would be trumpeted across the land. If Walker wins, the whole recall effort will be no big deal, nothing to see here, let's move on. It was a local thing, and the locals didn't run it right.
Dems never take responsibility for their actions. They talk out of both sides of their mouths. It's who they are. Actually, it's what the have to be. Their whole existence is built on a sham.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.