Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 05-29-12 (Debbie Does Dullness: Wasserman Weasels on Wisconsin)
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | May 29, 2012 | DUmmies and Charles Henrickson

Posted on 05/29/2012 6:30:28 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson

DNC Spinmeistress Debtie Wassername Shills

DNC SpokesDuNCe Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been using weasel words to speak about the upcoming Wisconsin recall election. Wasserman Schultz (apparently her hyphen is broken) is in a Dem dilemma. On the one hand, Debbie's got to put on a happy face about their chances in Wisconsin and the glorious nationwide victory that that will portend for November. On the other hand, privately, Debbie knows the Democrats are losing Wisconsin and are in big trouble for November. So now when she has to speak about the significance of the Wisconsin recall election, Wasserman is trying to cover her wass.

What is Debbie to do? Should Wassername Shills sound enthusiastic and excited about Wisconsin? Or should the Spinmeistress downplay the recall election, in case the Rethugs win? And should the Head DuNCe pour money into a losing cause? If she doesn't, she'll hear it from the progs and the union bosses.

Then there's the national aspect of this. If the Dems lose Wisconsin in June, it will not bode well for them in November. Debtie knows she'll have a hard time selling the Debtocrats and Baroke Obama this fall.

So Debbie is caught between Barack and a hard place. This is why Wasserman is weaseling on Wisconsin.

The DUmmies, true to form, are blaming Debbie for this mess. She's too centrist, too dull, too tepid and timid. That's the standard explanation for all Democrat failure, i.e., not being radical-left progressive enough. As we see in this THREAD, "Debbie Wasserman Schultz: ‘There Aren’t Going To Be Any Repercussions’ If Walker Wins In Wisconsin."

So let us now watch the DUmmies drub Debbie, in Recall Red, while the commentary of your humble guest correspondent, Charles Henrickson, wondering when the Democrats will recall HER, is in the [brackets]:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz: ‘There Aren’t Going To Be Any Repercussions’ If Walker Wins In Wisconsin

[Translation: "We're going down in flames, but I've got to pretend things are looking up for November."]

“It’s an election that’s based in Wisconsin. It’s an election that I think is important nationally because Scott Walker is an example of how extreme the tea party has been when it comes to the policies that they have pushed the Republicans to adopt,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But I think it’ll be, at the end of the day, a Wisconsin-based election. . . .”

[Debbie Does Doublespeak.]

Get her THE F*** out of that position. . . . how can she make a stupid statement like that?

[She's a Democrat. She's STUCK on stupid.]

If the folks in Wisconsin don't know the stakes in this election and re-elect that scumbag, they get what they deserve. And, no, the world will continue to spin. . . .

[As will Debbie.]

Rachel Maddow . . . might be a better choice for that position.

[Rachel likes to be on top.]

Sometimes I really wonder about Debbie, is she just clueless, or is it something else?

[To ask the question is to answer it.]

We need to see her eat her words!

[The taste of weasel, on both sides of her mouth.]

Even Cher, a supporter of Wasserman, tweeted her last week, saying if she did not get involved, she would lose respect for her.

[And the tweet goes on . . . the tweet goes on . . .]

It means heads are gonna roll in Wisconsin Dem circles.

[Cheeseheads will roll.]

It means we need HOWARD DEAN back.

[YEEEEEAAAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHH!!!!!!!]

she's got her head up her ass. Saying this means nothing???????

[Actually, she's covering her wass.]

Debbie does - something or other. Disappointment for one thing.

[Debbie Does Dullness.]

she's been a TOTAL disappointment. Utterly useless.

[Debbie Downer.]

Can we throw her out, early, if Wisconsin goes down? Or are we stuck with her through the end of her DNC term?

[Start a petition and have a recall election.]

Jesus Debbie...Sometimes I think the moose in your hair sinks into your brain.

[I thought it was Palin that had moose in her hair.]

That is mousse not moose. . . . Personally I think she has Bat Sh*t in her hair.

[Moonbat sh*t.]

"moose"? As in Bullwinkle?

[No, dahlink, as in "mousse and curl."]

I'm a little less impressed every time she speaks.

[But what about her hair? Isn't that impressive?]

If the Democratic Party can't be effective in Wisconsin, where can they succeed?

[France. Go there.]

What an idiot. How the hell did she become head of the DNC?

["Idiot" was one of the boxes on the application.]

The DNC is useless.

She's f***ing delussional!

f*** her.... she's another phony democrat. . . .

[DNCing With The Slurs.]

What are you on, Debbie? And can I have some?

[Debbie Does Doobies.]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: debbie; dnc; dufu; dummie; dummiefunnies; dummies; milwaukee; recall; schultz; scottwalker; tombarrett; walker; wasserman; wassermanschultz; wisconsin

Debbie "Mousse and Curl" Wasserman Schultz

1 posted on 05/29/2012 6:30:34 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix; Xenalyte; RMDupree; AlexW; CzarNicky; Mike Fieschko; motzman; codercpc; thingumbob; ...
Debbie Does DUFUs PING!

With a tip o' the hat to Libloather for suggesting this thread.

2 posted on 05/29/2012 6:37:20 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Debbie Does DUFUs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

(Doing my best Sam Kinison) Oh Oh OOOOHHHH!

Git that skanky woman off my screen!


3 posted on 05/29/2012 6:42:52 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Top ten I think although FR is sooooo slow.


4 posted on 05/29/2012 6:44:39 AM PDT by Mercat (Necessity is the argument of tyrants. John Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

I’m no longer using mousse having changed to Curl Diva which is a system of four applications starting with NO PU which is the main reason I use it - the name of the non-shampoo.


5 posted on 05/29/2012 6:47:21 AM PDT by Mercat (Necessity is the argument of tyrants. John Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Top 10

Mousse? I thought that was Mayo.


6 posted on 05/29/2012 6:48:03 AM PDT by NeoCaveman ("If I had a son he'd look like B.O.'s lunch" - Rin Tin Tin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Top 10 as usual.


7 posted on 05/29/2012 6:48:21 AM PDT by Poser (Cogito ergo Spam - I think, therefore I ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

I wish Debbie would come to my house. My grill needs cleaning.


8 posted on 05/29/2012 7:02:14 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Having ditzy Debbie as the face of the DNC is the best thing to happen to the Republicans in decades. As for her hair, my bet is on Italian dressing, not mousse (or moose, either, for that matter...).


9 posted on 05/29/2012 7:07:25 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

“Can we throw her out, early, if Wisconsin goes down? Or are we stuck with her through the end of her DNC term?

[Start a petition and have a recall election.] “

LOL That one’s worth the price of admission. :)


10 posted on 05/29/2012 7:08:29 AM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I wouldn’t use that to clean my grill. Too abrasive, and I’ve got a nice carbon buildup on my grates. I’ll stick with the brass wire brush.


11 posted on 05/29/2012 7:12:32 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

I guess I don’t understand the liberals.

They are the ones who initiated this whole dam recall thing in Wisconsin in the first place. They spent many millions of dollars and a lot of time, getting this recall going.

So, how can they now say that there’s no real significance to this recall election? If the recall doesn’t really matter, then why in the sam hill did they do this?

Based on previous statements, you would have sworn that the very future of the nation depends on defeating Walker and his conservative policies of having public unions pay more for healthcare and retirement.

So which is it? Does the future of the republic hinge on defeating Walker or not???????


12 posted on 05/29/2012 7:15:02 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
Mousse? I thought that was Mayo.

You are correct, sir!


13 posted on 05/29/2012 7:16:59 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Git that skanky woman off my screen!

Oh, you're asking for it now! More of Debbie Wasserman Mousse:


14 posted on 05/29/2012 7:25:51 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Debbie Does DUFUs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Debbie Washerhair Mousse.


15 posted on 05/29/2012 7:29:05 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Debbie Does DUFUs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

The face of the Democrat party.

And an ugly one for sure.


16 posted on 05/29/2012 7:31:20 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
That is mousse not moose. . . . Personally I think she has Bat Sh*t in her hair.

[Moonbat sh*t.]

That is mousse not moose, because the moose bit Debbie. Moose bites can be very nasty....

17 posted on 05/29/2012 7:38:13 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (It's time to take out the trash in DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Yaelle; theothercheek; SunkenCiv; SJackson; milwguy; ...
Pretty good sense of humor there, Charles.

Debbie generally comes off in public speaking as if there's a screw or two loose upstairs.

BTW, the LA Times had a piece yesterday, using Debbie to make the point that the Dems are pretty much giving up on the Wisconsin recall election. When their cheerleading friends in the media say that kind of stuff, you know they're hurting.

18 posted on 05/29/2012 7:56:02 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I think she’d clean up OK.

On the outside, that is.

The inside, well, there’s not much prospect of that.


19 posted on 05/29/2012 8:06:28 AM PDT by Erasmus (BHO: New supreme leader of the homey rollin' empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
So which is it? Does the future of the republic hinge on defeating Walker or not???????

That depends. If Walker is defeated, then the effort would be a huge success, and would be trumpeted across the land. If Walker wins, the whole recall effort will be no big deal, nothing to see here, let's move on. It was a local thing, and the locals didn't run it right.

Dems never take responsibility for their actions. They talk out of both sides of their mouths. It's who they are. Actually, it's what the have to be. Their whole existence is built on a sham.

20 posted on 05/29/2012 8:23:21 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Hilarious post. Thank you!
After all this, Republicans in Wisconsin had better not rest until the election is done. Can you imagine the Dem glee if after all this they are able to pull victory from the jaws of defeat? Can you imagine how insufferable Debbie would be? If hat doesn’t motivate the Wisconsin troops, nothing will!


21 posted on 05/29/2012 8:37:13 AM PDT by winner3000 (ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Hilarious post. Thank you!
After all this, Republicans in Wisconsin had better not rest until the election is done. Can you imagine the Dem glee if after all this they are able to pull victory from the jaws of defeat? Can you imagine how insufferable Debbie would be? If hat doesn’t motivate the Wisconsin troops, nothing will!


22 posted on 05/29/2012 8:37:16 AM PDT by winner3000 (ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

“Rachel Maddow . . . might be a better choice for that position.”

I agree. Put her out front and center so that all of America can see the true face of the mental disease called liberalism.


23 posted on 05/29/2012 8:51:26 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

A face only a socialist democrat could love. At the end of the day it really doesn’t matter what this NUT CASE says or thinks. She would argue the sun is the moon for her cause.
After November she can crawl back into whatever hole she crawled out of.


24 posted on 05/29/2012 8:53:18 AM PDT by spawn44 (mu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

“If the Democratic Party can’t be effective in Wisconsin, where can they succeed?”

Nowhere DUmmies. Which is why EVERY democrap politician must run to the center at every election. Your candidates MUST always LIE! If they ran on the truth, Dems would never win anywhere.


25 posted on 05/29/2012 8:57:04 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
If the Democratic Party can’t be effective in Wisconsin, where can they succeed?

California, Illinois, and New York for sure.

And by some amazing coincidence, the three states with the largest budget shortfalls....

26 posted on 05/29/2012 9:03:00 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

That guy Rachel Madcow isn’t going to run for any office until he runs out of fools with money he can drain. Right now a person has to go out of their way to see him, not so with public office.


27 posted on 05/29/2012 9:05:05 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

(apparently her hyphen is broken)


What a horrible visual as I sit down to eat lunch . . .


28 posted on 05/29/2012 9:06:58 AM PDT by LRoggy (Peter's Son's Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
Wasserman Schultz (apparently her hyphen is broken)

I think someone broke her hyphen a long time ago.

29 posted on 05/29/2012 11:05:50 AM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (There's no shame in attacking a criminal's bean bag. -- Ron Swanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

If you use gobs of Gericurl, can you claim 1/32 African American?


30 posted on 05/29/2012 11:15:13 AM PDT by bray (Power to We the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
She's too centrist, too dull, too tepid and timid.

Definitely too fugly by far............Can anyone stand watching that slobber-lipped face for more than a second or two?

31 posted on 05/29/2012 12:00:58 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69; rockrr; PJ-Comix
Can anyone stand watching that slobber-lipped face for more than a second or two?

rockrr, who can't get enough of it:


32 posted on 05/29/2012 12:23:24 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Debbie Does DUFUs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Thank you so very much Charles...youda mensch ;-)


33 posted on 05/29/2012 12:54:09 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Another one under the bus......wooohooo!!!


34 posted on 05/29/2012 1:36:37 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
What are you on, Debbie? And can I have some?

All this "love" from the base is probably causing DWS to seek comfort food:


35 posted on 05/29/2012 4:29:00 PM PDT by mikrofon (Devil's Food D-lights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
If the folks in Wisconsin don't know the stakes in this
election and re-elect that scumbag, they get what they
deserve. And, no, the world will continue to spin.

Let's see....
1) Less debt
2) More jobs
3) Less union thuggery
4) Stability
5) Cities coming back to life
Etc

How much more can they "deserve" and survive!! /sarc

36 posted on 05/29/2012 5:27:22 PM PDT by LUV W (This space reserved for heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

I think her hair is stuck in the 90s. Woman is out of touch
starting with her head!


37 posted on 05/29/2012 5:36:28 PM PDT by LUV W (This space reserved for heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon
Been awhile since I've awarded one of these, but you earned it:

Photobucket

38 posted on 05/29/2012 8:27:05 PM PDT by decal (I'm not rude, I don't suffer fools is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson; Lazmataz

Laz would hit it!


39 posted on 05/29/2012 9:48:02 PM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

As said at the end of Vadim’s ‘Les Liaisons Dangereuse’ (1960), “You can see her soul on her face”


40 posted on 05/29/2012 10:18:29 PM PDT by bt_dooftlook (Democrats - the party of Amnesty, Abortion, and Adolescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

I really hate that women, what a hateful commie bitch!


41 posted on 05/29/2012 11:15:36 PM PDT by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Wisconsin budget deficit was worse than any state in the union per person.

Then Walker came in and now there is a surplus.

42 posted on 05/29/2012 11:36:38 PM PDT by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
Big Ed Shultz is in panic mode about the Wisconsin election. He claims if the Democrats lose there that might mean they will lose in November AND if they lose in November that would mean NO MORE Democrat presidents in our lifetime. NewsBusters has a story about this.

BTW, my hand cast comes off on Monday so I should be in shape to blog the Dummie reaction to the Wisconsin recall election the next day.

43 posted on 05/30/2012 2:37:50 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson