Posted on 07/03/2012 12:49:25 PM PDT by Clay Taurus
My first thread on Free Republic I asked if Mitt Romney would balance the budget, and the consensus was that he would not. That we should expect more of the same. So for this next one, I will ask more stuff which is important to me a fiscal free market conservative:
Will Mitt Romney expand the role, size, and cost of government?
I’m asking these questions about the deficit, and size of government because I don’t understand what the difference is so far between Obama and Romney, and not sure what the point is in replacing Obama with Romney if it is going to be more of the same. I have been listening to Mike Church and Andrew Wilkow when I travel for work, and they have really opened my eyes around the idea of what an alternative is.
Will Mitt Romney expand the role, size, and cost of government?
I'm new around these parts, and just starting to understand how this site works. Please forgive me for 2 serious spelling mistakes in my previous first discussion thread which I started:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2901092/posts
Thanks; CT
The country is broke
Can’t increase the cost if there is no money
YES! Next question.
The vapid dork is Obama lite.
YES, he will...only less.
Does a bear poop in the woods?
Not if he’s in the White House.
Who was the last president who decreased the role, size, and cost of government?
I loathe meh romney, I loathe emperor bammy, but after serious consideration and much disgust, it’s better to take the possible unknown over the all too well known who is actively working towards our destruction.
Both will likely lead us to the end of America as we know it, but the kenyan caliph is hell bent on doing it NOW. With Meh, we maybe stand a chance of seeing a short reprieve.
I have to wonder how long you’ll last with that screen name.
So Roosevelt’s wars were silly and unnecessary?
Because, after all, another German/Japanese dictator would have done the same, right?
Clay - welcome to free republic. Looks like you’ve only been here less than a week. Usually people post articles and everyone comments. That’s the usual drill. What you have posted is essentially a “vanity”. We all occasionally post vanities but it is generally an exception. In your case you have posted two of them back to back harping on our weak RINO candidate. Like throwing red meat to a bunch of angry tigers. anyway - welcome aboard.
Reagan made the fed bigger.
As did Washington and Jefferson.
Can any one name an alternative to Obama to vote for?
Anyone???
if not - there’s your sign!
Welcome to FR.
Be sure tell your Kos friends to at least donate as they overrun the site.
Of course! It’s what liberals do!
Can any one name an alternative to Obama to vote for?
Anyone???
if not - there’s your sign!
Probably, however now the masses are more educated, vote senate and house for fiscal responsibility and then hope for the best.
The cost of government can only be increased as long as foreign investors and domestic inflation allow. As far as “role” goes, who cares about play acting? The debt/revenue munchers can dramatize all they like. For now, other nations are nice enough to give us products and the debt to buy them with. Have fun. Enjoy the slide.
I read that Romney’s position on most issues is virtually the same as Obama’s. So the answer is most likely he will.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.