Posted on 08/08/2012 10:31:28 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
One visit from Hillary Clinton and it's all gone! Four different recorded events involving the name of Barack Obama taking place in the then British Protectorate of East Africa have surfaced in British National Archives.
Details of the years between 1953 to 1963 were logged into the Kew branch of Britain’s public records office according to a communique dated July 18, 2012, authored by Dan Crosby.
“A record of birth of a second son (of Barack Obama, Sr.) is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama, Sr., fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth,” says Crosby.
Now, the spelling of “Burack” and Biraq” surfaced in hand written line records along with a listing of a marriage license registration dated 1954 and a 1961 birth.
The problem researchers now are struggling with in attempts to verify this data involves Series RG36 reference books, but “researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 or the British Public Records Act of 1958.”
Microfilm for the British birth registrations seems to be under the same lock down as microfilm Sheriff Joe Arpaio and lead investigator Mike Zullo have tried unsuccessfully to locate. “Where is the microfilm?’ Sheriff Joe asked a recent East Orlando Tea Party seminar.
Hillary Clinton traveled to Great Britain in 2009 as part of her junket to Africa, and “evidence shows these records were available for public access” before this trip.
She is alleged to have made “a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates in early August of 2009.
For some unknown reason Obama, Sr. did NOT include the birth of a son on his INS application to remain in America …….
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
The Democratic party is a terrorist organization. Exactly like the National Socialists.
The ends justify the means...does anyone trust the integrity of the vote counting this November?
I don't think the integrity of the vote really matters this time. They've engineered extreme liberals at the top of both tickets.
♫Either way you look at it we lose.♫
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2884935/posts
Since the biography was confirmed as authentic and the information within it could ONLY have come from Obama, the fact that he isn't in federal custody awaiting trial is just part of the continuing outrage.
Does anyone believe Rahm Emmanuel’s trip to Kenya in Dec 2008 after obama was elected and before the inauguration, was just a family junket?
Hillary Rodham has no reason to hide obamas records- she’d want them for her own use...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Okay thanks!
Article, & check out # 7 , # 9.
[Not this kind of tie]:
Or he’s a liar that can’t be trusted... either way...
If she traded them for the VP slot she has reason to keep them hidden...
http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2012/07/breaking-obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered-in-british-national-archives-2409268.html
http://thepowerhour.com/news4/obama_kenyan_birth_certificate.htm
Our tax dollars at play.
Bookmark
This is a book blurb. It has nothing to do with Harvard. Focus.
Focus? Exactly where? Look up and read where I wrote "Anyone know if this is true?" I was asking a question about it so I could be better informed. Obviously you just saw the image and didn't bother to read.
Focus
The whole purpose of an Obama Presidency, at least on the World stage, is to “break “ the US Constitution and show it can no longer protect God-granted liberty from the power of the beast.
It has about done the job at this point.
Not sure how we get started, maybe through the Tea Party treads, but we all need to volunteer as poll watchers. I plan to very soon go to my town officials and ask them to show me that these machines will count properly, I want to SEE it!
Here's my excuse, if you are in the mood for an excuse.
There suddenly is a suspicious amount of renewed activity on old stuff right now ... stuff that has been outed, vetted, hashed and rehashed for 3 years. Now the new wave of stuff is trotting it all out again ... but oddly enough with many all already-disproven inaccuracies, misstatements, and just plain wrong info.
I really suspect a campaign of misinformation and misdirection. Why now are Hannity, Beck, AND Rush jumping on the "College Records" bandwagon? This stuff has been out there since '06! Now they are quoting Root? A "Columbia Man" with lousy grammar and not-quite-right factoids? WTF? Over.
Perhaps they are setting an elaborate trap for Obama and his harping on Mitt's tax records ... which as POTUS he has instant access to anyway ... I don't know ... I no like.
I am getting twitchy and itchy. Somethin' Ain't right here.
ON please.
And we must prove it in November ................................................................ FRegards
Of course! Our votes are going be counted in Spain by a Soros company. What is not to trust? /s
The "math will be:
0b0z0's votes X 2
Romney's votes X 1/2
It’s okay, no wurries. I just got it and never saw it before and as you say there’s all kinds of stuff out there that surly needs vetting before posting. I was just curious if anyone else has seen it before and what is its provenance.
Have you ever heard Harvard man, obie, speak without a teleprompter?
That’s the reason these pollsters are skewing the polls to make it appear a close election so that when they count the votes (and dis-count the GOP votes) the masses cannot cry foul.
That bio. came from BHO’s literary agents:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/Obama-pamphlet-in-use-2007
Now that you mention it sounds familiar.
I gotta tell you, the suspense is building.
WHAT are a couple of those inaccurate ‘facts’ you’ve kept alluding to for the past day or so?
Because in 2003, Obama was already a well known State Senator in Illinois preparing to run for the U.S. Senate. Yet, according to Root, Obama wasn't even invited to the 20th reunion. He hadn't yet highlighted his 'graduation' from Columbia as a Senatorial or Presidential candidate.
SEE #32
Exactly, I have said that to my wife weeks ago...but exit polling will tell a different story, unfortunately that is too late.
Why, the First Birther did, of course!
BFD. Best Bet? Obama was not a "Transfer Student" to Columbia College. He was a walk-in General Studies student, who was slipped into the "graduation track," which in and of itself is or was not so unusual.
The deal is (or was) that if you completed enough at General Studies, had acceptable credits from another school, or for "life experience," one could get a Columbia degree for General Studies work. That degree; that diploma, oddly enough, was issued by Columbia College.
I am reasonably sure that Bill Ayers received Obama in NYC. Obama's gay-activist-Marxist Mentor at Occidental, Laurence Goldyn, was a close friend of Ayers. Ayers could have easily shepherded Obama through Columbia, using his strong family ties on the faculty.
That's news. I.E., Bill Ayers is not "a guy from the neighborhood." He and Obama were connected in NYC.
Furthermore, what is also really unusual is that Obama actually spent very little time at Columbia ... so little time that it IS scarcely credible that he completed enough course work to qualify for a degree. "How much time" "What was he doing and where?" Those are the real questions.
Root should know all about General Studies students and the GS programs. He should also tell us that fellows from the élite Ivy League Columbia College did not pal around with General Studies students, who with good reason or not, were usually viewed as oddballs. General Studies people were not Ivy Leaguers trying out for football, or crew. More importantly, they were certainly not required to take the then famous Core Curriculum (which is why Columbia College very rarely accepted transfers).
>"Nobody knew Obama at Columbia?"
(a) Not quite true as several have surfaced who did, and
(b) no big deal if the overwhelming majority of the Columbia College Class of 83 did not know him. Why would they? He wasn't one of them.
Root was a Poli Sci major, Obama claims the same. However we have no idea what Obama took and neither does Root. That's a real issue. It is quite possible that they never took the same Poli Sci courses ... or that Obama never took any Poli Sci courses at all.
That's why the records are important.... not that "nobody knew him."
On the "Who Paid?" question: it now turns out that Grandma Payne Dunham more than likely footed the bills during this period from the proceeds of a rather impressive oil-and-gas-lease trust fund of which she was the executrix.
Root first unveiled his story in 2008. He should have used the research available on this site and elsewhere to at least update the info before resurfacing.
Now if the Romney Campaign, is using surrogates to bring up the facts about Obama's strange college career, that's great. But inaccuracies in Root's revived story will quickly sidetrack the campaign into arguing about trivia.
Did Obama apply as a foreign student? If Grandma was paying, why would he? There are no student loans or scholarships on the record, despite what Obama himself would like you to believe. Of course, it would be nice for Occidental and Columbia to fork over their admission records ... but who is supposed to make them do that?
Root offers:
(a) nothing new.
(b) adds to the confusion with ... to say the very least ... misplaced emphasis
(c) Offers nothing actionable anywhere.
And does anyone think those two cargo ships headed for Mombasa (one was temporarily hijacked)about the same time was just a usual U.S volunteer relief shipment of supplies. These enigmas concerning Obama stretch an inquiring mind.
Ping
Back to the thread; check out # 37.
Thanks, Kenny Bunk.
Which faculty members, exactly, are you referring to when you talk about Bill Ayers’ connection on the Columbia faculty?
Anyway, a LOT of people see the country circling the drain and hear people fighting about Obama/Romney....People that are pretty much out of the loop. I think all the little rumor and innuendo that floated last time are coming up again, for good reason--NO ANSWERS. The Root commentary is back because his MAIN POINT is worth looking into.
....And with Obama going negative to the extreme, ALREADY, I think it's great that Limbaugh, etc., put this out into the public consciousness yet again.
Root may not be the best writer in the world, but his theory about Obama’s years at Columbia ring somewhat true. I have my own theory about Mr. Obama, that being that Frank Marshall Davis (his bio daddy IMHO) opened the doors of the old Chicago Communist Party to BHO. Frank worked closely with Val Jarret's father in law (perhaps grandfather...but I think it was father in law)and close members of Axlerod’s family. Once Barry got in this with this group, he caught Thomas Ayers eye, as Ayers was looking for a black guy puppet to eventually run for Mayor and take back the eduction cabal run aground by a black power structure. Ayers paid his way up and out of crappy Oxy, when crappy graded Barry got an unheard of 3rd year transfer to Columbia, then greased the skids all the way up to and including the Harvard Law Review presidency. Bill Ayers then wrote DREAMS and helped him with the forgery of those tedious loose ends, like the Selective Service card. Barry started his political life in Bill Ayers living room and he was off to the races.
So....my take on your post: I think it's only a good thing if a former Obama "independent", paying attention for the first time, reads Root and begins their own little research project. They will quickly figure out what has been debunked. Mr. Roots theory HAS NOT BEEN.
well, she oculd trade them for Vince Foster’s autopsy, Chelsea’s DNA, and/or audio or video tapes of her with her girlfriend in some hotel room or at Camp David!
Bingo!
Another, Bingo! There's already talk about not counting the military votes. They sure got that out early, huh.
Ayers was a grad student at The New School for social Research.
He had a cousin, or sister-in-law who was a professor of Education at Barnard, Sorry I don’t remember more at this time. Been a while. Also ... the main question here is the NYC connection between Ayers (aka, “The Guy from the Neighborhood”) and Obama.
(Ayers is important to Obama, and it's possible they met in Manhattan; but there's not much to really link Ayers to Columbia itself.)
WIKI:
--------------------
After the September 11 attacks in 2001, Brzezinski was criticized for his role in the formation of the Afghan mujaheddin network. He countered that blame ought to be laid at the feet of the Soviet Union's invasion, which radicalized the relatively stable Muslim society. ...
In August 2007, Brzezinski endorsed Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. He stated that Obama "recognizes that the challenge is a new face, a new sense of direction, a new definition of America's role in the world."[23] – also saying, "What makes Obama attractive to me is that he understands that we live in a very different world where we have to relate to a variety of cultures and people."[24] In September 2007 during a speech on the Iraq war, Obama introduced Brzezinski as "one of our most outstanding thinkers,"
Tiny cough of poster's remorse from me. Still workin' on it!
That Brzezinski Link is very important ... as you point out, Obama's stay at Columbia was rather suspiciously brief for him to study his way to the degree ... and of course, we are not allowed to see what courses he actually took.
I seem to have missed the main point about Wayne Allyn Root's revived article about "Obama at Columbia, etc." Yeah, there's an awful lot of chaff mixed in with the good hard wheat, but that doesn't seem to be quite the real point here.
Root's article has provided the former rock'n'roll DJ's who pass as political philosophers on "Conservative Talk Shows," a hook upon which they can hang questions about Obama's bona fides ... without falling into the all-media-forbidden "Birther-Nut" (I'm one) category.
This is great for them. That's because it gets them off another hook: namely their universal failure to even mention the various "eligibility issues." IMNSVHO, That's been making all of us rather itchy.
I mean not a one of the gold brick, emergency food, software, and mattress salesmen has even mentioned Sheriff Joe' Arpaio's work in establishing that what Obama showed the world was most likely not what he got from the Hawaiians, and that his SS# and Selective Service Records are mighty fishy, to say the least..
So, Root's Re-Hash has been good for them. And it is good for us. That's because finally, our favorite right-wing yakkers are now at least approaching the eligibility issue, even if indirectly. Will it mean anything in the election? Well, even if it isn't the "Magic Bullet," it is still good ammo. Good Luck to us all!
BTW, I speak everyday with Obama supporters; True Believers. All I can say is that they fit into the missionary category of the "Invincibly Ignorant."
A crack-smoking Obama could be joined to Larry Sinclair by Louis Farrakhan on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, Eric Holder could then machine-gun 500 Mexican women and children, and still Obama would get their votes.... or so they tell me ... 'cause he's gonna tax the rich.
obumpa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.