Skip to comments.Re: 2nd debate: Was “get the transcript Candy” a pre-arranged and scripted setup?
Posted on 10/18/2012 5:59:46 AM PDT by FiddlePig
She seemed to have the transcript as if on queue
if not, a strange coincidence indeed!??? Obama saved by the girl?
No such thing as a coincidence in politics. The fact that she disputed something Romney said is a disgrace - fully expected but a disgrace nonetheless. She’s was the moderator not a debate participant!
Obama throws like a girl and has to be defended by a girl (”girl” in the latter case is used very loosely).
Anyone ever see “Lie to Me”?
One of the frequent tells they exposed in that show
is a verbal response that is way too quick.
It was obvious.
Obama was waiting for that challenge, and the rose garden speech transcript on hand by the moderator is proof that conspiracy took place prior to the debate.
Obama and Crowley choreographed the debate? (Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:14 p.m.)
When the inevitable Libya question was asked, Obama baits Mitt by saying, “I said on day one that it was an act of terror.”
Mitt, knowing the administration sold the youtube theory around the world for nearly two weeks after the attack, moves in for the boom.
Obama says “check the transcript.”
Moderator picks up a piece of paper and says “he’s right.”
Why did Obama say “check the transcript” and Crowley just happened to have one sitting right in front of her? What are the odds?
Then what else is left for her to do, but incorrectly back up the president in front of millions of people. The most puzzling thing during this orchestrated insanity is the crowds applause as if the president has just been exonerated. They were in effect applauding the idea that the president knew it was a pre-planned terror attack on day one and had been lying to the world the whole time.
Did the president and Crowley orchestrate this exchange and bait Mitt into it?
When Mitt brought up Fast and Furious Obama says “Candy?”. Immediately she interrupts Mitt and tells him to stop talking about it.
I have been Tweeting out this very question and it seems most missed the ‘coincidence’. The very transcript that would be needed to back up Obama just happens to be available and read to go. A slamming video needs to be made so Obama and CNN are exposed for this BS.
Can Mitt request that the Presidential Debate Commission look into this? He should demand that the rules in the next debate be adhered to or he should just go off and break them the same as obama does. If he sees the moderator is not giving him a fair shot, he should call him out then and there. Why should Mitt play by the rules if debate ethics are a thing of the past?
That said, if she read the transcript and then accepted the Axelrod/Obama interpretation that Obama was indeed calling the Benghazi attack an "act of terror", she's an idiot.
This obvious set up has become widely commented on in the new media. I trust team Romney will devise a way to turn it into another exploding cigar for Obama during the foreign policy debate.
That was my first thought -
How did she know Obama was going to say that?
Even granting (for argument’s sake) that she did not let the campaign know what questions were going to be asked, it doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to know Libya was going to come up.
Somebody somewhere had to have told Crowley what Obama was going to say.
In other words, while we heard she would not give advance info to Obama, there was no talk of Obama not giving her any.
Because she could immediately input on Obama’s Rose Garden “terror comment”, I’d say collusion without a doubt.
Drudge had this article from liberal SF up this morning. The article isn’t the story. The comments at the end are the story. For anyone who thinks the American people aren’t paying attention......
Does a Democrat covet your freedom and your money?
Here’s the problem....The transcript was inches away.
I don't believe this for a New York second. She 'got' it because she gave them the question in advance and she colluded with them to defeat Romeny, period. Nothing less than blind obedience was expected from her.
I posted this earlier but I thinnk it needs to be repeated.
Not sure if this is on another thread but I looked at the video of the debate and it looks like BO was given the questions.
At 1:06:35 in the debate, a question from Kerry Luska was going to be asked. BO actually walks up toward the man, nods at him and says softly, Hi Kerry before the man is even identified by name. Then he appears to step back and tries to look confused by looking all around but Kerry stands up practically right in front of him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.