Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re: 2nd debate: Was “get the transcript Candy” a pre-arranged and scripted setup?
Stop the Leftist Propaganda Machine ^ | 10-18-2012 | NotMe

Posted on 10/18/2012 5:59:46 AM PDT by FiddlePig

She seemed to have the transcript as if on queue… if not, a strange “coincidence” indeed!??? Obama saved by the girl?


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: crowley; debate; obama; setup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
Just wonderin?
1 posted on 10/18/2012 5:59:54 AM PDT by FiddlePig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

YouTube Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a-sp0b33fbs


2 posted on 10/18/2012 6:01:54 AM PDT by FiddlePig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

No such thing as a coincidence in politics. The fact that she disputed something Romney said is a disgrace - fully expected but a disgrace nonetheless. She’s was the moderator not a debate participant!


3 posted on 10/18/2012 6:01:57 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The Left blaming Jim Lehrer for the debate is like blaming Liencoln's assassination on the play.i of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig
I saw this today: Photobucket
4 posted on 10/18/2012 6:02:00 AM PDT by Never on my watch (I can see November from the Chick-Fil-A drive through lane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Obama throws like a girl and has to be defended by a girl (”girl” in the latter case is used very loosely).


5 posted on 10/18/2012 6:03:19 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Anyone ever see “Lie to Me”?

One of the frequent tells they exposed in that show
is a verbal response that is way too quick.

It was obvious.

Obama was waiting for that challenge, and the rose garden speech transcript on hand by the moderator is proof that conspiracy took place prior to the debate.


6 posted on 10/18/2012 6:03:46 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Obama and Crowley choreographed the debate?   (Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:14 p.m.)
When the inevitable Libya question was asked, Obama baits Mitt by saying, “I said on day one that it was an act of terror.”

Mitt, knowing the administration sold the youtube theory around the world for nearly two weeks after the attack, moves in for the boom.

Obama says “check the transcript.”

Moderator picks up a piece of paper and says “he’s right.”

Why did Obama say “check the transcript” and Crowley just happened to have one sitting right in front of her? What are the odds?

Then what else is left for her to do, but incorrectly back up the president in front of millions of people. The most puzzling thing during this orchestrated insanity is the crowds applause as if the president has just been exonerated. They were in effect applauding the idea that the president knew it was a pre-planned terror attack on day one and had been lying to the world the whole time.

Did the president and Crowley orchestrate this exchange and bait Mitt into it?

When Mitt brought up Fast and Furious Obama says “Candy?”. Immediately she interrupts Mitt and tells him to stop talking about it.


7 posted on 10/18/2012 6:03:58 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

I have been Tweeting out this very question and it seems most missed the ‘coincidence’. The very transcript that would be needed to back up Obama just happens to be available and read to go. A slamming video needs to be made so Obama and CNN are exposed for this BS.


8 posted on 10/18/2012 6:04:51 AM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Can Mitt request that the Presidential Debate Commission look into this? He should demand that the rules in the next debate be adhered to or he should just go off and break them the same as obama does. If he sees the moderator is not giving him a fair shot, he should call him out then and there. Why should Mitt play by the rules if debate ethics are a thing of the past?


9 posted on 10/18/2012 6:07:30 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig
If one reviews the moment it seems obvious that it was a set up. And an easy one at that. They knew, everyone knew, Benghazi would come up and the idiotic excuses they made would be an issue. The fact that 0 mentioned terrorist activities during the presser where he blamed the whole thing on a stupid film was, they hoped, their salvation. I think it exposed their ineptness even more.
10 posted on 10/18/2012 6:07:41 AM PDT by pepperdog ( I still get a thrill up my leg when spell check doesn't recognize the name/word Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig
She was his secretary that night, "Cowly, run across the street and get us some coffee..."; "Cowly, tweet this message out to all my supporters..."; "Cowly, did you bring that Rose Garden transcript like I asked you to..."
11 posted on 10/18/2012 6:08:16 AM PDT by dps.inspect (rage against the Obama machine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
My understanding is that Candy interviewed Axelrod on CNN a couple of days previously and he tried out this line on her at that time. She probably got the transcript then to see what was said. So it is possible that it is not a coincidence.

That said, if she read the transcript and then accepted the Axelrod/Obama interpretation that Obama was indeed calling the Benghazi attack an "act of terror", she's an idiot.

12 posted on 10/18/2012 6:08:16 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

This obvious set up has become widely commented on in the new media. I trust team Romney will devise a way to turn it into another exploding cigar for Obama during the foreign policy debate.


13 posted on 10/18/2012 6:08:39 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

That was my first thought -

How did she know Obama was going to say that?

Even granting (for argument’s sake) that she did not let the campaign know what questions were going to be asked, it doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to know Libya was going to come up.

Somebody somewhere had to have told Crowley what Obama was going to say.

In other words, while we heard she would not give advance info to Obama, there was no talk of Obama not giving her any.


14 posted on 10/18/2012 6:10:06 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Because she could immediately input on Obama’s Rose Garden “terror comment”, I’d say collusion without a doubt.


15 posted on 10/18/2012 6:13:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Drudge had this article from liberal SF up this morning. The article isn’t the story. The comments at the end are the story. For anyone who thinks the American people aren’t paying attention......

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/10/17/feinstein-intelligence-flaw-lax-security-to-blame-for-libyan-terror-attack/


16 posted on 10/18/2012 6:13:47 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Does a Democrat covet your freedom and your money?


17 posted on 10/18/2012 6:13:54 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Here’s the problem....The transcript was inches away.


18 posted on 10/18/2012 6:15:54 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
She probably got the transcript then to see what was said.

I don't believe this for a New York second. She 'got' it because she gave them the question in advance and she colluded with them to defeat Romeny, period. Nothing less than blind obedience was expected from her.

19 posted on 10/18/2012 6:16:36 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

I posted this earlier but I thinnk it needs to be repeated.

Not sure if this is on another thread but I looked at the video of the debate and it looks like BO was given the questions.

At 1:06:35 in the debate, a question from Kerry Luska was going to be asked. BO actually walks up toward the man, nods at him and says softly, “Hi Kerry” before the man is even identified by name. Then he appears to step back and tries to look confused by looking all around but Kerry stands up practically right in front of him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEpCrcMF5Ps


20 posted on 10/18/2012 6:19:18 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson