Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Benghazi and Obama. What you are about to read is HUGE if true. Could mean the end of him.
clear-light-of-day ^ | 11/15/12 | Daryl

Posted on 11/15/2012 6:30:48 AM PST by Evil Slayer

I received this message yesterday. IF this proves to be true, it is impeachable grounds. It also may help explain why Petreaus was forced out a few days before the Benghazi hearings coming up. It explains a lot of behavior by Obama and his administration - the pulled security, the "stand down" orders, and blaming that stupid video. The fireworks are coming. It will be the first of many disasters ahead.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama "staged" the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental "October Surprise" that would guarantee him re-election.

Yes, you read that right, and no, I'm not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

In Obama's October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.

This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.

There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration... our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to "stand down," which basically means to "surrender." That was part of Obama's plan.

They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary "complications." That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were "lighting up" the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren't supposed to resist.

That wasn't "part of the plan." It also wasn't part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama's orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be "clean." Quick. Efficient.

Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the "nick of time." They didn't factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives... American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process... which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.

THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped (sodomized), murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own... dead by American hands.

Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to "bring those responsible to justice.

"Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration.

The "Video" defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn't outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: benghazi; chat; conspiracytheory; hbostrikeback; obama; octobersurprise; tinfoilhat; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-136 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2012 6:30:55 AM PST by Evil Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

This theory was floated before the election. Not sure it will get any traction now, as it didn’t then. It’s an interesting set of circumstances and worth considering.


2 posted on 11/15/2012 6:33:15 AM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
I received this message yesterday.

I saw THAT message in October, prior to the election. I have not heard anything that would prove it wrong since, and consider this scenario the most likely...

3 posted on 11/15/2012 6:34:15 AM PST by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Evidence ... SOMEONE has to come forward and put his name, freedom and perhaps life on the line, preferable several somewhat unrelated people.


4 posted on 11/15/2012 6:36:21 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Old news. May be true. Prove it.


5 posted on 11/15/2012 6:36:21 AM PST by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

Like you, I saw this story - the 0bama regime plan to have Stevens kidnapped so the Blind Sheik could be freed in exchange for him. This, along with the story that 0bama was giving arms to the muslim brotherhood radicals make as much sense as anything. They all amount to waging war on The United States of America - TREASON!


6 posted on 11/15/2012 6:37:33 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Remember the Heroic SEALs of Benghazi and DEMAND a Full Accounting!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
We do not control the senate, Obama will not be impeached. Genl Betrayus will take whatever blame should be Obamas. This investigation is over.
7 posted on 11/15/2012 6:37:40 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

bttt


8 posted on 11/15/2012 6:38:41 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Also heard this prior to the election. There is NOTHING Obegone can do wrong to bring up impeachment. No One Cares about Justice there in Washington,D.C.


9 posted on 11/15/2012 6:39:09 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
It doesn't matter if it's true. The MSM will dismiss it as "tinfoil" and refuse to investigate or cover it.

They will cover for Obama even more than they covered for the Clintons. The fate of the Branch Davidians and Vince Foster opened my eyes. There will never be MSM coverage of anything that would put one of the Anointed in a negative light.

10 posted on 11/15/2012 6:39:26 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (political correctness is communist thought control, disguised as good manners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

The ambassador locked himself in the safe room. That is why he wasn’t taken alive. I do believe it was a kidnapping gone wrong. Not sure about the other stuff involving POTUS knowledge etc.


11 posted on 11/15/2012 6:39:44 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Forget it. The losers in D.C. fear race riots if he gets the justice he deserves. He’s black (well, sort of) and there won’t be anything done because of that.


12 posted on 11/15/2012 6:40:01 AM PST by crosshairs (America: Once the land of the free. Still the home of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

There would be no other reason Obama would deny the consulate’s earlier pleas for more security.


13 posted on 11/15/2012 6:40:08 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Add: the media is all in for Obama, the general public is too self-absorbed or too burnt out or too stupid to care.

There, that throws more fuel on the funeral pyre.

We (USA) are toast. All you get from burned toast is bread crumbs. There are not enough crumbs to go around for everyone. Note that gun/ammo sales have skyrocketed. More companies announcing layoffs, or increased prices...

Guess those Mayans were right! :)


14 posted on 11/15/2012 6:41:44 AM PST by sassy steel magnolia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Seems pretty far-fetched, but even if true, so what? Who’s going to impeach him? Okay, the House. Who’s going to prosecute and convict him? The Democrat-dominated Senate?


15 posted on 11/15/2012 6:42:42 AM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Ugh, this is pure tinfoil-hattery. *rolls eyes*


16 posted on 11/15/2012 6:43:15 AM PST by SpekeParrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

It is very odd that both Hillary and Panetta are in Australia this week.

If you really think about it, what are the chances of both of these high ranking cabinet officers being in a place like Australia unless there is something important going on and they both need to be far away from DC


17 posted on 11/15/2012 6:44:02 AM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

“Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process..”

Why haven’t we heard from anyone that 80 attackers were killed ?

How would trading the Blind Sheik have helped 0bama win re-election ? I think more people would see him a s weak.


18 posted on 11/15/2012 6:44:09 AM PST by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

He isn’t going to be impeached. Period. End of story.

Now pay your damn taxes already.


19 posted on 11/15/2012 6:44:29 AM PST by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator

To: Evil Slayer

And you think the Senate would vote to remove him from office after the House impeached him? Remember Clinton?

Sorry, won’t happen. Even if true, even if exposed, even if impeached by House.......

We are deeply into days of lawlessness - by government....


21 posted on 11/15/2012 6:46:01 AM PST by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sassy steel magnolia

The final report:

The Petraeus CIA provided inaccurate information about events on the ground to the Obama Administration, particularly to President Obama and United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice.


22 posted on 11/15/2012 6:46:01 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

The press suppressed information until after the election.

The Senate WILL NOT move on any issue impeachment.

The media will make this a one day story at best.


23 posted on 11/15/2012 6:46:01 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

It must be true, it’s on the internet.


24 posted on 11/15/2012 6:46:18 AM PST by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

The story about the request to release the blind sheik was out there before Benghazi. There were several articles by Andrew McCarthy and the guy who led the prosecution team in the case against the blind Sheik, saying that Americans needed to beware because they thought that Obama was maneuvering to release him and that if he didn’t do it before the election that win or lose he would do it after the election.


25 posted on 11/15/2012 6:46:45 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: william clark

There is some value in impeachment without conviction. At minimum, we at least go down fighting. Perhaps it wounds and hobbles the regime; perhaps it makes them more defiant; either way, impeachment is either right or wrong on its own merit, regardless of what reed (sick!) does or does not do.


26 posted on 11/15/2012 6:46:45 AM PST by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

obama says: “Eat your golden goose and stfu!”

(nothing will come of this)


27 posted on 11/15/2012 6:47:02 AM PST by gotribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Even if this could be proved beyond any possible shadow of a doubt, the media, the Senate and the 47% wouldn’t care a bit. The only response would be “we won”,


28 posted on 11/15/2012 6:47:15 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Oh, he can be impeached. Clinton was impeached, but the Senate failed to remove him from office.


29 posted on 11/15/2012 6:47:21 AM PST by ican'tbelieveit (School is prison for children who have commited the crime of being born. (attr: St_Thomas_Aquinas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madison10
There is NOTHING Obegone can do wrong to bring up impeachment.

Brings to mind former LA Gov. Edwin Edwards' statement, "the only thing that could do me in is if I were caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

Were this to happen to Obama, the "media" would hide the dead girl and blame the boy.

30 posted on 11/15/2012 6:47:40 AM PST by ScottinVA (I've never been more disgusted with American voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: william clark

It is my cynical belief that Obama could freely hand over all our military assets to Russia, China and Iran and the voting sheeple
would hardly blink

Santa Claus has been re-elected and we can go back to watching DWTS. Benghazi LIbya.. Is that a new wings place?

Barak Obama can do as he pleases and he knows it. Who is there to stop him?


31 posted on 11/15/2012 6:49:38 AM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

“Genl Betrayus will take whatever blame should be Obamas”

He certainly will since his wife got paid off.


32 posted on 11/15/2012 6:49:42 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SpekeParrot

Might be a plot to a movie...but the motive doesn’t sound plausible. To trade away the blind sheik would smell more like capitulation to terrorists than Obama riding to the rescue. Seems to me *that* would have had a negative impact on his popularity.


33 posted on 11/15/2012 6:50:16 AM PST by Miles the Slasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
The Senate doesn't impeach. The House does. After Impeachment in the House, the Senate can vote to remove the President.

Constitution 101.

34 posted on 11/15/2012 6:50:29 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
Our weeping leader is not going to do it. Not PC, racist. Obama controls all. Accept it and eat your peas.
35 posted on 11/15/2012 6:50:33 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Obama would have lost the election had he traded the blind guy. Remember according to The White House prior to 9/11 there were no terrorists to kidnap any one, the Middle East was at peace and had that bad American not made the video none of this would have happened.
36 posted on 11/15/2012 6:51:18 AM PST by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

#
Col. Ken ALLARD: Obama knew about the attack, ignored three requests for help
Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:42:26 AM · 4 of 38
wiggen to Cincinatus’ Wife

The ambassador was not meant to die i bet. Smoke inhalation. I bet all along he was going to be captured without a shot being fired hence the stand down orders. Obama frees him and boom,big positive public relations before the election. If,as is widely assumed we arm arming the rebels in Syria would these people attack us at this time?The whole narrative changed when the 2 CIA men went and engaged the enemy with full expectation of help. This story is likely far dirtier than it;s even being reported.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies


37 posted on 11/15/2012 6:52:17 AM PST by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Trading the blind sheik for a kidnapped US ambassador doesn’t seem like it would have been a big political win for Obama. All the same questions concerning lax security that allowed the successful terrorist attack could also have been asked about how a US ambassador could have been kidnapped.

Some of the actions and inactions by the administration that are supposed to have followed the supposed boshed kidnapping plan do make sense, but trading the blind sheik for a kidnapped ambassador sure wouild not have been a foreign policy victory for Obama. The opposite.


38 posted on 11/15/2012 6:52:22 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Who’s going to impeach him? Boehner’s House? Who’s going to convict him? Reid’s Senate? Who’s going to put pressure on Congress to do something? The MSM or the Obamaphone nation?

Don’t see it happening.


39 posted on 11/15/2012 6:53:55 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Cut the cable today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
I can believe this scenario. I have been wondering about the H130's in the area. The local commander should have scrambled them in response to the plea for help. They are structured to hit targets with minimal collateral damage.

I have been so angry and frustrated over Benghazi since it happened I don't know what to do.

Romney should have been all over this and the O's other impeachable offenses, of which there are plenty.

McStupid is NOW all over this, but where was he when most of us conservatives knew what Obama was going to be? Well, he was listening to Steve Schmidt and his other overpriced know nothings and teling us O would make a good President, basically endorsing the enemy.

The diff between McCain and Romney's vote was Sarah Palin.

vaudine

40 posted on 11/15/2012 6:53:55 AM PST by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

You do have a point there. The weakness that existed in the Senate republicans in the 1990s has expanded to the congressmen.


41 posted on 11/15/2012 6:54:17 AM PST by ican'tbelieveit (School is prison for children who have commited the crime of being born. (attr: St_Thomas_Aquinas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Photobucket Enjoy the show people.... Oh look! Squirrels!
42 posted on 11/15/2012 6:54:43 AM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
Do you believe that the CIA really provided inaccurate information? It seems that CNN and Nick Robertson knew the truth, how could the CIA have gotten it wrong?

Why would CNN [or CNNi] refuse to air the Nick Robertson report with Muhammed Al Zawahiri (brother of Ayman Al Zawahiri) that clearly shows the Egyptian uprising was 100% in response to his call for protests for release of the Blind sheik on 9-11.? Why would the “most trusted name in news“, hide the report showing the truth, and instead allow the false narrative to be sold, by them, to the American electorate?

Here's a link to an article which has the video of the interview that CNN refused to run in the US. Egyptian riots were not about the video, either

43 posted on 11/15/2012 6:55:23 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

The House impeaches, the Senate convicts.

Clinton was impeached but never convicted by the Senate.


44 posted on 11/15/2012 6:55:44 AM PST by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Good place to talk things over and plan legal defenses without a lot of Americans watching.


45 posted on 11/15/2012 6:56:27 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

yeah weeping creeps me out. I remember seeing the films of Saddam weeping as his best friends were led out to be shot from the Iraqi parliament


46 posted on 11/15/2012 6:57:07 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

I have been saying this as soon as I heard of the attack.


47 posted on 11/15/2012 6:57:55 AM PST by stockpirate (Democrrats stole the election via fraud, we will never have a free election again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

yep, fer sure.

And many years from now, some bearded hollywood actor who thinks he is so very cool and so much smarter than everyone else will make a movie about it and probably end up blaming Bush...and the dumb socialists that America then has as its citizens will shake their heads at how this could have ever happened to their wonderful leader, obummer, who by then will have been named as permanent leader (aka china, north korea, iran, syria...) and all movies will be made thru the government production company...


48 posted on 11/15/2012 6:58:18 AM PST by sassy steel magnolia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

I doubt anything will happen to jimmah carter the 2nd. Just like billy jeff the media will swarm around and save his butt. When this is all over, repub heads will be rolling and the zero will be standing amongst smouldering ruins.


49 posted on 11/15/2012 6:59:34 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Unnngh! To many PDS people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

This is a bridge to far....


50 posted on 11/15/2012 7:03:49 AM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson