Skip to comments.Disastrous 2008 Proposed Gun Ban List Is Being Floated Again... (Final List Will Be Worse)
Posted on 01/09/2013 7:16:27 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." ~Rahm Emanuel
Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. Obama shared his administration plans just five days after the school shooting that killed 26 children and adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Now Congress and the White House have the framework for legislation from 2008 (see below), a serious tragedy, and a corrupt mainstream media like never before... They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family.
Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.
Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.
"The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse)" by Alan Korwin, Author, Gun Laws of America
Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Bradys plan to introduce shortly.
I have an outline of the Bradys current plans and targets of opportunity. Its horrific. Theyre going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. Theyve made little mention of criminals.
Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical...
(Excerpt) Read more at redflagnews.com ...
We need to have a review of WACO and Ruby Ridge to eliminate the stupid NFA, GCA and other legislative rules that caused the Feds to go berserk.
30 to 20, to 10, to “five or six”, to 3 to 1 to NONE!
This example is as good as any:
Bloomberg Blasts NRA: ‘Connecticut Is Because of Some of Their Actions’
But if he had his preference, Bloomberg said he would go farther than the 1994 ban and outlaw all automatic and semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines. The mayor said magazines shouldn’t be allowed to contain more than five or six rounds.
“If you haven’t hit the deer with three shots, you’re a pretty lousy shot. The deer deserves to get away,” he said....
“Nobody needs 30”. Hmmmm, can we also limit the number of pages in Hustler Magazine, like who needs 30 pages of Hustler?
Absolutely nowhere in the Bill of Rights does it say these rights are to be based on a demonstrated “need” for them. Quite the contrary. They do not say what a citizen may or may not do - the Bill of Rights explicitly says what the government may NOT do. It may not infringe upon my rights. FUBO. I’m keeping my AR and 30 round magazines, keeping the Glock and its 15 round magazines. Anyone wants to try, Molon Labe. In uniform or out, you’re an agent of unconstitutional oppression and tyranny and will be treated as such.
Nobody needs a congressional cafeteria/limos/oval offices/private bathrooms/perks paid by the txpayers/to be excused from the laws they right for others.....
I submit this question for consideration, “How many enemies,foreign or domestic, criminal sand/or tyrants may I shoot before I must reload and how rapidly can I shoot them?” I submit to you that there should be no limit other than that of the military pattern firearm technology that I now possess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.