Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Totalitarian's *** *****! Anthropogenic Global Warming… aka: Climate change (in cold winters).
RedNeckoBlogger ^ | 6/24/2013 | RedNeckoBlogger

Posted on 06/24/2013 7:42:09 AM PDT by FiddlePig

Obama in Berlin and after the Oklahoma tornado the usual suspects are back blaming Anthropogenic (human caused) Global Warming… aka: Climate change (AGW-CC).

What's odd (really not) is that this "crisis" like all others can only be "solved" by imposition of a socialist/fascist top-down dictatorship. Most of those loyal to the Left political spectrum seem willing to surrender their liberty, prosperity and maybe even their souls (and that of future generations) to such a dictatorship! Overlords who will ration and control ALL aspects of your soon to be grim life! (for what maybe is WRONG!). No one can escape from this tyranny because they might violate the “cure” for AGW/CC. Living one's life of course, puts the Earth at "risk".

Earth will essentially become a giant plantation (not unlike the Old South)… with a caste system! Our autocratic rulers will dwell in the "Mansion of the Hill", us “lowers” in the real mud huts. Maybe we’ll get a coupla hours of electricity a day, or maybe only a week. All energy, food, medicine and resources will be rationed from the top down (the ULTIMATE “trickle down"!). There also must be total control of your reproductive system (yep, they're in your bedroom!) as “unauthorized” births must NOT occur. Periodic culling of "non-productive" humans (who decides that? Death Panels???) will be "executed" to prevent overpopulation... beginning with the sick, the old and possibly those who hold counter-political, moral and religious views to those who rule (aka: Masters/Owners). This “utopia” will be HELL on Earth for most of the population... but Earth will be "saved"! ... sounds like right outta the Book of Revelation! I prefer to take my chances with liberty and the possibility that maybe God is in control.

More at RedNeckoBlogger website!

(Excerpt) Read more at redneckoblogger.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; tyranny
We hear/read 97% of the worlds climate scientists believe in human caused climate change... Where the hell does that number come from? Turns out that it was only 79 of 'em in a self-selected survey. 76 of the 79 agreed with AGW-CC, thus the 97% number (propaganda anyone?).
1 posted on 06/24/2013 7:42:09 AM PDT by FiddlePig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Hmmm??? If article link doesn’t work... click here:

http://redneckoblogger.blogspot.com/


2 posted on 06/24/2013 7:46:09 AM PDT by FiddlePig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Why excerpt your own material?


3 posted on 06/24/2013 7:46:47 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Well here in Alaska, last winter was a month and a half longer, it was snowing in May! However it has made up for it by it being 20 degrees hotter than normal a month later.

So it is changing, both ways the same year.

I think it was called weather before the Marxist Congress.


4 posted on 06/24/2013 7:52:07 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Pretty funny. I’ve called it an envoronmentalist’s wet dream since 2008. ;-)


5 posted on 06/24/2013 7:56:32 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig
If carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy CO2 generators to double plant growth?
6 posted on 06/24/2013 8:23:37 AM PDT by Baynative (Lord, keep one hand on my shoulder and the other over my mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig
We hear/read 97% of the worlds climate scientists believe in human caused climate change... Where the hell does that number come from? Turns out that it was only 79 of 'em in a self-selected survey. 76 of the 79 agreed with AGW-CC, thus the 97% number (propaganda anyone?).

A good question.

What are the qualifications to be a climate scientist? Papers published? Degree major? Years in the field?

Are the qualification requirements stable or change over time?

Who sets the qualifications?

Who decides their position on the issue? Is there a degree of hedging allowed?

MSM and Science don't mix very well, yet MSM influences voters of the low information kind.

7 posted on 06/24/2013 8:23:48 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

***Well here in Alaska, last winter was a month and a half longer, it was snowing in May!***

So? We had snow in May for the first time ever in Arkansas/Oklahoma.


8 posted on 06/24/2013 8:24:20 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Just pack a picnic lunch and it will rain...humans have been causing the climate to change for eons


9 posted on 06/24/2013 8:32:08 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k; FiddlePig
Is this the same group that FR was commenting on not too long ago? "Concerned Scientists for Climate Change" or somesuch. Buncha people with a fancy letterhead and a fax machine, at any rate.

A more motivated FReeper than I did a bit of digging, and found out that the "scientists" quoted were public policy wonks and lawyers. There was one person in the group who had a degree in something semi-related - Geology maybe - but the rest of the people were just useless eaters.

Sez me, I'll take an opinion formed from my own engineering background, and the common sense displayed by FReepers in general, over that of a bunch of lawyers.

Were it only that the media had such common sense, as well.

10 posted on 06/24/2013 10:01:01 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

That number - the 97% - comes indirectly from a thesis paper a student was writing for his master degree. He sent out 10,400 surveys to folks in the field and received 3,400 replies. As part of the survey, the folks replying had to check a box indicating their vocation (meteorologist, environmental scientist, climate expert, geologist, etc.) There were about two dozen different occupations from which you could choose. Seventy-nine of the 3400 respondents checked the climate expert box and all but two of them were pro-global warming (err, climate change).

BTW the paper raised a number of valid points concerning shortcomings in the global-warming (uhh, climate change) argument. But nobody who quotes the 97% figure ever acknowledges the valid points.


11 posted on 06/24/2013 12:19:04 PM PDT by tyou50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Kinda my point.


12 posted on 06/24/2013 2:29:32 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson