Posted on 06/21/2015 10:18:45 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
An injunction issued against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by federal judge Leigh Martin May could spell the beginning of the end for Administrative Law Courts and with them, 80 years of unconstitutional abuse of power by the Executive branch.
Administrative Law “…allows for the creation of public regulatory agencies and contains all of the statutes, judicial decisions, and regulations that govern them.” These regulatory bodies include the EPA and the SEC. Many came into being during the reign of Franklin Roosevelt, the one president more arrogant and power hungry than Barack Obama. The law itself “…is created by administrative agencies to implement their powers and duties in the form of rules, regulations, orders, and decisions.”
What an efficient way of getting things done, given it is the Administrative Agencies themselves which write and implement much of the law by which they are governed in Administrative Courts! And it is the Executive Branch–the White House–which directs the agenda of these powerful administrative bodies.
Given the incestuous relationship between the Agencies and the Courts which implement their decisions, it is rare that a victim of White House/Executive branch overreach can successfully defend himself. In any event, a journey through the legal system in actual judicial courts is guaranteed to cost millions.
How corrupt is a quasi-legal system which targets “evil-doers” based as much on political persuasion as ability to pay outrageous fines? In 2014, 5 of the world’s largest banks “…plead guilty to conspiring to manipulate the price of U.S. dollars and euros in foreign currency markets.” For this illegal conspiracy, the banks were fined nearly $5.8 billion. The banks were also convicted of felonies!
However, as is ALWAYS the case when criminality involves the “too large to fail”...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
These admin agencies have become the defacto 4th branch of gov’t.
I'm not sure those agencies are directed by anybody. I think they have their own internal agendas and regard Presidents, congressmen, and judges as annoyances.
How can we NOT have a vote on whether or not the Treasury Dept. can take Andrew Jackson off the $10 bill?
Could be big!
Jackson is on the twenty.
Government (Congress) today has become the bastion of lobbyists to get their pet projects done. The real governing nowadays is done by the faceless bureaucracy controlled or shall I say guided by the executive branch.
Congress has lost/relinquished an incredible amount of governing power over the past decades. The main consequence is that the people are no longer represented by it.
Now that is a tough call to make.
EPA thugs and their pals would no longer be able to threaten the coal industry with bankruptcy ?
No actual link to ruling.
Thanks for the link.
Not to mention Wickard v. Filburn.
And who exactly is going to enforce this ruling?
Question to anyone...
Does a ruling or regulation by the EPA carry the same force of law as Congressional legislation?
Here’s my line of thought...
Since the President of the United States is the Chief Executive Officer of the Executive branch of government, and the EPA is part of the Executive branch, why can’t the President just refuse to enforce EPA regulations, or, why can’t he publicly ridicule EPA findings and studies, and just publicly throw them in the trash can?
If it sounds to good to be true . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.