It’s going to have to take more than an anonymous tip to an obscure website.
It was all a setup,article for the weekend talk shows to have something to go after Trump and surrogates.
Washington Post is one of the world’f premiere fake news sites.
Thank you, Travis Mcgee for this.
I overheard two men talking and the one man was a ‘journalist’ and he said that when a ‘news outlet’ reports something, they have 14 days to take it back and say it was a misprint or something to that affect...
So what I am going to do is go back on all the ‘re takes’ and count the days and see if this is true...
Apparently if they don’t do this in the 14 day period, they can be sued...interesting isn’t it...
So this would be ‘fake news’...got it.
More #fakenews from the fakenews media. Then they wonder why so few people trust them any more.
#OnTheTakeNews
So Trump is right yet again.
Washington Fake Post
Pray America woke
F. Chuck Todd was unavailable for comment.
Does this mean that the Washington Post printed fake news?
Amateurish Bezo’s attempt? Might as well start that one since it came from the Post.
Exactly what Reince Priebus was saying over ans over to that lame, Chuck Todd.
No named sources - just like the original story.
Bait.
Who are these “multiple sources” denouncing the WaPo story?
CIA officials are going to have to come out of the shadows and make definitive statements one way or the other. Either way, WE, the citizens are going to have the final say. They should know that.
Is anyone reporting this other than a blog?
Ouch, if this article is true because it is not being reported in any other news outlet at this moment and this is a massive story....then there is a major problem with the left using the CIA or major internal problems in the CIA.....if this story is not true then the massive story is that the CIA has become political and inserted itself into American politics for the democrats as there are stories out there stating that it was an internal leak not a hack.
“TruePundit” has ZERO credibility. Next...
That is a new wrinkle.
Over the weekend, the FBI claimed the CIA was lying about Russians hacking the election.
First they try to cover for Hillary and the Dems. Then they try to cover their posteriors.
All this finger-pointing! And most of it is based on ‘the seriousness of the charges’ without much in the way of ‘evidence’.
I have yet to hear exactly what the Russian hacked to sway the election. Priebus stated again this weekend on the Sunday morning news-talk that the RNC was not hacked during the time that the DNC supposedly was being hacked. Now, the Dems/media are trying to turn that around as proof the Russians were involved because they DIDN’T hack the RNC.