Posted on 07/27/2018 4:43:22 AM PDT by davikkm
This week’s meeting between President Trump and Vladimir Putin in Helsinki triggered the most hysterical response from the mainstream media that I’ve ever seen. And in the Trump era, that’s really saying something. The media took what was a typical meeting between heads of state and turned it into a clown show. According to their twisted worldview, the meeting was undoubtedly treason, and further evidence that Trump was colluding with Russia all along. However, a sober analysis of the US’s relationship with Russia paints a much different picture. Below are several observations that call into question the validity of the Russia collusion narrative.
Voting to Give Trump More Power
Some of the loudest voices screaming about collusion between Trump and Russia are high-ranking, establishment politicians in Congress. But if Trump is truly a Russian agent, why would people such as Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff, who often promote the collusion narrative, vote to keep warrantless surveillance in the hands of Trump? That would just give Putin more power, wouldn’t it?
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
Doesn’t HAVE to make sense.
They just have to keep repeating it until enough idiots believe it.
They had this worked up long in advance of Trump winning. It was their contingency plan in the off chance that Hillary lost...
re: all this Russia BS, the question I have - which I never hear discussed anywhere - is: why is it assumed that Russia prefers Trump to Clinton in the first place? Russia could have gotten whatever it wanted (uranium for instance)from a Clinton administration by simply writing a check.
We know they know what they did. "Now we all hang."
What part doesn't anyone understand?
The ny daily snooze had the words on the front page: Trump/Putin lovefest.
That rag is a reliable indicator of what the insane left is thinking.
I beginning to feel like Trump is using the Russian collusion story like I use a laser pointer with my cat. The only difference is my cat is smarter than the journalists in this analogy.
The Russians would have absolutely preferred Mrs. Bill Clinton to Trump. After all, she is 100% known to not be careful with information, even Top-Secret information. And she helped them get uranium.
But Putin hedged his bet a little by having a few Russians with computers take out ads for Trump knowing that if Trump did win the left would be upset. In his wildest dreams Putin didn't believe that "upset" would really be "ballistic", but it is and so Putin feels like he won the lottery.
Sober doesn’t describe the hysterical Left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.