Posted on 10/28/2018 5:10:50 AM PDT by kevcol
NBC’s Kate Snow put up a tweetstorm Saturday explaining why NBC belatedly published a piece Thursday revealing that a 2nd witness provided by Michael Avenatti to back up Swetnick’s account directly contradicted claims Avenatti made on her behalf. Snow claims she and NBC hadn’t finished vetting the article about this 2nd witness until the Kavanaugh confirmation was over and so decided to drop it as old news. That supposedly changed this week, when Sen. Chuck Grassley referred Avenatti and Swetnick to the DOJ for investigation. That referral, Snow claims, suddenly made the story newsworthy again.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Pants on fire!!!
They definitely sat on it, to influence a Supreme Court Confirmation proceeding.
Hey Grassley-—!!!
“hadn’t finished vetting the article...”
Yeah. If anyone had actually even somewhat vetted the original hit job..
The good senator should add NBC to his referral...
NBC hadn’t finished vetting the article....
Yeah right, they ran with the rape, being a drunk charges without “vetting” was no problem for them.
They still have not corrected all the lies told by them and that little girl voice liar or told the background of her lawyer who owes millions.
Excluding exculpatory information is the same MO as when the FBI applies for a FISA warrant.
....the devil made me do it, and starting on Nov19 a new comedy titled
How Rats Eat Their Own, family oriented....ah er aah 8 Pm Wednesdays
on the flaming peacock channel.
nbc should be put of business.
It’s called “selective reporting” in the journalism trade.
Evidence showing Kavenaugh is innocent and that charges against him were made up is “old news”. Evidence that one of his main accusers lied under oath is “old news”.
Indict that b1tch.
Then incict NBC News executives.
Then remove their broadcast licenses.
... for starters.
NBC is the Democrat Party at work.
Lying POS traitors.
NBC; the network that is a press-release agency for anything Avenatti spouts is suddenly worried about vetting stories? Riiight.
Can't let the people know who he really is.
Excluding exculpatory information is the same MO as when the FBI applies for a FISA warrant.
—
The brilliant Dr. Ford didn’t know what “exculpatory” means. I guess NBC doesn’t either.
So fake. They don’t vet anything. If it’s negative they push it and if it’s exculpatory they shelve it.
Lol. Lying wonders!
Lol. Lying wonders!
Are you sure you are not mixing Ford with Swetnick? Ford is the one with the little girl voice when testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee. As far as I know this is the only time we ever heard Julie Swetnick speak. I do not hear that little girl voice when she speaks. Now in complete honesty I admit that I did not listen to the entire interview she had with MSNBC's Kate Snow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.