Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Mercury a ‘hit-and-run’ planet?
MSNBC Space News ^ | Jan. 11, 2006 | By Robert Roy Britt

Posted on 01/25/2006 10:26:47 PM PST by Swordmaker

Computer modeling suggests that collision affected its formation

New computer modeling shows that the planet Mercury might have been formed in a hit-and-run collision that stripped off its outer layers.

Astronomers have long assumed that collisions played a huge role in planet formation. The early solar system would have been loaded with dust that became rock that became planets, the thinking goes. Computer models generally have objects sticking together to make ever-larger objects — or in large crashes, two objects might become gravitationally bound.

In the new scenario, a glancing blow would dramatically alter the smaller object, even disintegrating it into pieces that could be some of the space rocks that land on Earth to this day.

. . .

"Imagine two planets colliding, one half as big as the other, at a typical impact angle of 45 degrees. About half of the smaller planet doesn't really intersect the larger planet, while the other half is stopped dead in its tracks," Asphaug said. "So there is enormous shearing going on, and then you've got incredibly powerful tidal forces acting at close distances. The combination works to pull the smaller planet apart even as it's leaving, so in the most severe cases the impactor loses a large fraction of its mantle, not to mention its atmosphere and crust."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; mercury; planets
Thanks to Fred_Nerks and SunkenCiv for the heads up...

Mosaic of photos of Mercury

1 posted on 01/25/2006 10:26:48 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker; Fred Nerks; 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; ...

Thanks SM for posting it! I guess I didn't go to be after all (wound up working until 1 AM). Off I go now...


2 posted on 01/25/2006 10:47:57 PM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Spitzer Sees the Aftermath of a Planetary Collision
Universe Today | Jan. 10, 2005 | Dolores Beasley and Gay Yee Hill
Posted on 01/13/2005 8:50:18 PM PST by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1320521/posts

Red Planet's Ancient Equator Located
Scientific American (online) | April 20, 2005 | Sarah Graham
Posted on 04/24/2005 8:18:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1390424/posts

When the Days Were Shorter
Alaska Science Forum (Article #742) | November 11, 1985 | Larry Gedney
Posted on 10/04/2004 10:31:59 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1234919/posts


3 posted on 01/25/2006 10:58:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Interesting.


4 posted on 01/27/2006 10:22:45 AM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

5 posted on 05/06/2007 9:10:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 6, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Mercury's formation impact splattered Earth with material
Royal Astronomical Society
April 05, 2006
New computer simulations of Mercury’s formation show the fate of material blasted out into space when a large proto-planet collided with a giant asteroid 4.5 billion years ago. The simulations, which track the material over several million years, shed light on why Mercury is denser than expected and show that some of the ejected material would have found its way to the Earth and Venus... "Mercury is an unusually dense planet, which suggests that it contains far more metal than would be expected for a planet of its size. We think that Mercury was created from a larger parent body that was involved in a catastrophic collision, but until these simulations we were not sure why so little of the planet’s outer layers were reaccreted following the impact,” said Dr Jonti Horner, who is presenting results at the Royal Astronomical Society’s National Astronomy Meeting on 5th April.

6 posted on 05/06/2007 9:13:38 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 6, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Mercury’s spin reveals molten, not solid core
Reuters | Thursday, May 3, 2007 | Julie Steenhuysen
Posted on 05/03/2007 10:51:50 PM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1828141/posts


7 posted on 05/06/2007 9:20:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 6, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson