Posted on 04/17/2007 6:42:17 AM PDT by bedolido
New research has shown that women are more interested in a man’s lunch-box than his face. Oh yes-sireee-bob! Heather Rupp, Ph.D., post-doctoral fellow at the Kinsey Institute has conducted tests in which eye-tracking technology monitored how often men and women peered below the belt when presented with pornographic images.
"Men looked at the female face much more than women, and both looked at the genitals comparably,” Dr Rupp said. The research appears to smash, or at the very least dint, certainly scratch the popular notion that men are more visual and women more tactile when it comes to sexual turn-ons. The fact that women wear a lot more silk and lace lingerie than men is used as evidence for this popular assumption (lingerie feels great for a woman, looks great for a man.)
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.news.com.au ...
ask terisius
ping...
LOL (assuming you mean Tiresias)
Study rates chocolate better than kisses [what is second base?]
abcnews.net.au | 4-17-2007 | staff writer
Posted on 04/17/2007 9:59:42 AM EDT by bedolido
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1818673/posts
ROFLMAO !!!!
The trap door on that box looks like it’s spring loaded. LOL
yaknow...googling a word is useless for spelling because there are all kinds of links to pages that have misspelled the word also. Second time I’ve tried this and found out I still misspelled the word. maybe, i should just learn to spell.
It's still a very funny response. Easy to forgive the spelling.
hehehehehe
This is constantly happening to me. I have having to tell women, “I’m up here sweetheart. I’m not a piece of meat, ya know.”
It's tasteless and disgusting and I, for one, am tired of being ogled...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.