Posted on 03/30/2008 1:48:08 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
This is the author of the article speaking. Not Secretary Rice.
Well, now I can sleep tonight.
Tom
You are probably correct. I think she is one of the most brilliant women to ever serve the US government. But she does have a cool and almost prickly exterior. I have heard that she is a huge pro football fan and she sometimes aspires to become NFL Commissioner some day. I think we should let her go to pursue that dream. God bless Condi, and I wish her nothing but the best.
The only difference between Rice and Mad Maddy is so far Laptops in the State Department aren’t missing. Other than that policy wise they could pass for political twins.
As I said in #31, I’m not surprised you can’t see it. I and many other conservatives see it plainly, from what she’s said. You, a Rice loyalist, are blocking.
If that were the only negative, it might be overcome, but it isn’t. I’ve already mentioned a couple of the big negatives.
Enough said.
Secretary of States number one job is to keep the peace. Hence she will take positions that we, here, hate.
I love Condi, and I would love to see a McCain/Rice ticket!!!
I don’t think we should elect American leaders based on their support of a foreign country. Let foreign countries take care of themselve.
John
I was listening to the Laura Ingraham Show this morning.
Tammy Bruce is guest hosting. She said McCain would not ask Condi because her personal life would not pass scrutiny.
Does anyone know what she means by that?
The problem is the State Department is ran by career beauracrats who are for the most part socialist democrats and generally baby boomers who grew up anti American during the Vietnam war.
People think that political appointees run the government but that is not the case. Its ran by the rank and file civil service, unionized bureaucrats who answer to no one.
Rice is a great person and I would love to have her as VP.
John
She is more than likely lesbian.
John
Oh my, I didn’t know that. Come to think of it, you never hear about her and a boyfriend.
That’s the only reason I suggest it, considering how attractive and smart she is.
I would still support her though although Mitt is probably the more prudent choice.
John
Which is always a plus with the Libs. Whether she is or is not matters not a bit to me.
The fact remains that she is damaged goods by virtue of being part of the Bush administration and will be seen as just that by most voters.
You won't see it because it isn't there. Her comments are 180° away from Obama's or those of any other Democrat race pimp.
Unfortunately, too many "conservatives" suffer from selective illiteracy; they see what they want to see.
Rice: not nice.
Reason #1- She would link McCain to the Bush administration making it easy for the Dem nominee to run against Bush.
Reason #2- She's crazy clueless on the topic she's supposed to know the most about- Russia. The Cold War is back and she just doesn't get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.