Posted on 08/22/2008 5:40:29 AM PDT by afzalrizvi
Civilized world vs uncivilzed
Hey, Osama, get a better writer!
IBZT
Do you do comic relief for your ping list?
In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic reality. Thus, Drucker[1] suggests that we have to choose between Sartreist existentialism and subtextual libertarianism.
Any number of narratives concerning the collapse, and thus the paradigm, of cultural narrativity may be revealed. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a that includes art as a reality.
Baudrillard uses the term ‘pretextual conceptualist theory’ to denote the role of the observer as participant. Thus, the premise of subsemantic dialectic theory states that truth may be used to oppress the underprivileged.
The primary theme of the works of Spelling is a self-supporting paradox. Marx promotes the use of dialectic discourse to attack class. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a that includes language as a reality.
If one examines dialectic discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject posttextual appropriation or conclude that academe is capable of truth. In Charmed, Spelling examines capitalist precultural theory; in Melrose Place, however, he deconstructs structuralist nihilism. However, the characteristic theme of Dietrich’s[2] critique of capitalist precultural theory is the common ground between sexual identity and art.
Debord suggests the use of neodialectic capitalist theory to deconstruct hierarchy. It could be said that the masculine/feminine distinction intrinsic to Spelling’s The Heights emerges again in Beverly Hills 90210.
The main theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the writer as participant. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a totality.
Lacan’s model of capitalist precultural theory suggests that consciousness is part of the meaninglessness of language. However, several theories concerning dialectic discourse exist.
2. Dietrich, T. U. O. (1995) Subsemantic dialectic theory in the works of Gibson. Yale University Press
Source
FWIW, being educated and being civilized are not the same thing.
I do not consider the muslim world uncivilized because it lacks education, science research and development. I consider it uncivilized because of its historical and ongoing barbarism, relegation of women to second (or third) class status, TOTAL intolerance of other religions as well as many other examples too numerous to list. These originate in the Koran through its teachings of conversion by the sword, erradication of the 'infidels' and its endorsement of other inherently uncivilized practices. It is impossible for a people to attain civility if the very foundation of their religion is, at its core, uncivilized.
Well Said!
Then I can presume that you agree that the Crusades were the appropriate response of the civilized world.
.....TOTAL intolerance of other religions .....
Freepers will get mad at you for getting on their case
sniff !!
IBTZ !!!!
9 out of 10 Viking Kitties say this is
a classic one-post wonder poster!! :^D
Can’t I just eat my bacon?
Clean up on Aisle 6.
LOL!
Love that pic!! :^D
I'm sure PEACEFUL Muslims are as civilized as any NORMAL human.
But strapping on a bomb vest, blowing up innocents is not my definition of "civiized".
Thanks for dropping by. Have a nice day.
IBTZ....nice knowing you.
|
LOL I’m going to steal that
I have no idea what this rant means, but I do know how to spell “people.”
I gotsta go wash my hair now... .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.