Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PHILIP BERG TO TALK ON MIKE SAVAGE SHOW

Posted on 02/24/2009 3:34:38 PM PST by spiderfern

Philip Berg next on Mike Savage show. CNN discounts any talk about birth certificate.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: barackobama; berg; bho2008; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; british; certifigate; citizenship; colb; conspiracytheories; constitution; corruption; coverup; democrats; democratscandals; eligibility; ineligible; kenya; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; orly; orlytaitz; philberg; scotus; taitz; truthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: F16Fighter

You asked — “Will you be bleating much during 0bama’s speech this evening?”

Well, I don’t like listening to Obama. I refused to listen and/or watch his inauguration or listen to his speech and I won’t listen to him now, either.

However, I will read some reports about it and see what the analysis is....

[... no Obama for me... thank you... ]


21 posted on 02/24/2009 4:54:49 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Are you still trying to “get traction”... LOL..


22 posted on 02/24/2009 4:55:37 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I agree and think Keyes commands a lot of respect.


23 posted on 02/24/2009 4:55:39 PM PST by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
How are you my friend? Been a while...

I'm not familiar with the referenced poster or her "fractured bible lessons," but "fractured lessons" seem to be a trend ;-)

24 posted on 02/24/2009 4:58:14 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

As a post on another part of your statement — “Curious that you find yourself as an apologist for 0bama by discrediting Berg’s Birth Cert investigation and attributing it to a “Derangement Syndrome” a la Bush; That makes it a “Two-fer” for you.”

It’s only those with “Obama Derangement Syndrome” who think I’m an apologist for Obama. I didn’t vote for him and I won’t even listen to his speeches..., but will go over analysis of his positions and read reports on the position of the administration on issues.

I campaigned against Obama prior to the election and saw that I lost — I got outvoted by the Obama people...

So, afterwards, I saw that the way to stop Obama was to properly vet him through state laws to that effect, which is what is being done in Oklahoma and Arizona.

And the ones who continue to beat a dead horse over what a court of law will do nothing about, and especially since Obama is the President and it takes an Impeachment hearing to do anything about that — they’re the ones who think that anyone who doesn’t go for their “Obama Derangement Syndrome” is a supporter of Obama... :-)

I just see what “reality is” — and go for what works, hence the route of “state laws” for vetting candidates. And furthermore, working on changing results for the elections of 2010 and 2012...


25 posted on 02/24/2009 5:00:29 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
She was outted again this evening HERE, and she's doing her best to try and cover her poo.
26 posted on 02/24/2009 5:02:21 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
"Well, I don’t like listening to Obama. I refused to listen and/or watch his inauguration or listen to his speech and I won’t listen to him now, either.

However, I will read some reports about it and see what the analysis is...."

That's reassuring...

But please don't keep on believing in the Tooth Fairy. The Game IS rigged and has been since the guy on the left became President:


27 posted on 02/24/2009 5:03:52 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

On the Berg issue, you said — “Then as now it remains incongruous that the World Trade Center could get hit twice by hijacked jets with known Islamo-terrorists aboard, as well as the Pentagon (200 miles away from NYC) WITHOUT confrontation by ANY U.S. Air Defense.”

Well, sorry, I’m not a “Phil Berg truther”... :-)

I don’t think Bush (”and company) had any knowledge that this attack was going to happen to us and the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Of course, there was already knowledge of an attempt out of the Philippines where closely similar was tried (but failed) But, there are lots of things, related to terrorists going on, all over the world. That’s why it’s been said it’s going to be impossible to stop the next big terrorist attack.

And, furthermore, when the attack did happen, I don’t think that there was any effort or any actions to impede US Air Defense from reacting to it.

If you’re a “Berg truther”... well..., so be it.. [it could explain your affinity for Berg and the Obama Derangement Syndrome, too...]


28 posted on 02/24/2009 5:07:32 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

Sounds more conspiracy-minded than I am...

That’s about all I can say about it.


29 posted on 02/24/2009 5:08:45 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

If you put chains on, you might get more traction... LOL...

It might help not being in the Obama Derangement Syndrome camp, too...


30 posted on 02/24/2009 5:10:45 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
See what I mean? ... It must be so embarrassing to be caught so completely as a fraud at FR! But she'll be a hero at DU.
31 posted on 02/24/2009 5:15:36 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
"It’s only those with 'Obama Derangement Syndrome' who think I’m an apologist for Obama."

Is THAT all? LOL...Would that be those of us who believe Barry Hussein 0bama-Soetoro is a complete fraud?

"I campaigned against Obama prior to the election and saw that I lost — I got outvoted by the Obama people...So, afterwards, I saw that the way to stop Obama was to properly vet him through state laws...

Your heart's in the right place, but you're surrendering your intellect to implausibilities. There is a time to be cynical. Bush allowed a tsunami-sized Mexican Illegal Invasion to go on unabated. 0bama was NEVER "vetted." PERIOD.

"The ones who continue to beat a dead horse over what a court of law will do nothing about, and especially since Obama is the President and it takes an Impeachment hearing to do anything about that...

So you've surrendered and expect others to do as well?

With all due respect, kindly get out of the way, madam. The Constitution must not be trampled upon any further; there are still many who shall NOT be deterred from the seeking the truth.

"I just see what 'reality is' — and go for what works, hence the route of 'state laws' for vetting candidates."

No. You're a "pragmatist" - There's a huge difference. But don't worry - we'll chase down that horse that left the barn you gave up on.

32 posted on 02/24/2009 5:18:30 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"See what I mean? ... It must be so embarrassing to be caught so completely as a fraud at FR! But she'll be a hero at DU."

Oye vey! Our globalist "moderate" friend has a severe case of RINO-itis. No wonder the GOP has been getting pummeled.

33 posted on 02/24/2009 5:21:43 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

You said — “Is THAT all? LOL...Would that be those of us who believe Barry Hussein 0bama-Soetoro is a complete fraud?”

Well, under our particular system of justice, when someone is accused of being a fraud and there is legal action to be taken — it is customary to *prove it*.

The funny thing about this “prove it” (on behalf of the accuser...) is that the ones with Obama Derangement Syndrome think that the “crook” (according to them) must “prove that he is a crook” — in order for their case to be adjudicated... LOL..

And, there has been no court that has accepted anything in the way of proof that moves this case forward in order to remove Obama from office. That’s the failure of the Obama Derangement Syndrome people to prove their case. No court will move on the absence of anything that can prove the accusation of fraud.

Obviously many of the Obama Derangement Syndrome people don’t know much about the justice system... :-)

And that’s precisely why I say that the way to “vet a candidate” is by passing state laws requiring specific documentation for candidates, like Oklahoma and Arizona are doing.


34 posted on 02/24/2009 5:23:33 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

You also said — “So you’ve surrendered and expect others to do as well?”

No, I’m working with my own legislator in Oklahoma for laws to properly vet a candidate with specified paperwork...


35 posted on 02/24/2009 5:24:57 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson