Skip to comments.Roger Ailes and Murdock Supressing Obama Eligibility Story (Vanity)..And Elvis and JFK ZOT!!!
Posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts
I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source within the Fox Network. Rest assured that Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdock are sitting on the Obama eligibility/birth certficate story. Everyone else wants to jump all over it, including Sean Hannity.
I say storm the Ailes/Murdock fax machine/email servers--let them know (politely) we need this issue thoroughly.
Maybe someone has the email/fax numbers?
I do not doubt it at all.
And so are the other media moguls.
However, the story will bust wide open one day.
Where have we heard that before?
Of course they’re supressing it. Obama likely was born in Kenya...people there remember it...and his grandmother who died suddenly during the last days of the campaign...told neighbors that her daughter’s baby was born in Africa.
But right now the economy is in free fall...the Messiah is seen as necessary to keep certain folks in line.
Nobody’s gonna cover this.
Sitting on what? the fact that there is a question? Or some new info about it?
Yup. “source” could be code word for figment of my imagination. Then again, Fox is now a leftwing channel..
True or not.......the commy fool will take the blame for the implosion of the world economy....and maybe in 2010 the GOP can start the repairing....leave his butt in there now
They were surpressing this story long before the crash.
Maybe if they really work on it, any revelations will come out before the election......
Is it gaining traction because of the soliders who joined in the lawsuit?
“Where have we heard that before?”
From API maybe?
FOX? You mean that bastion of conservative thought which fell right in line with the rest of the MSM in building an altar to Hussein the Great? Well knock me over with a feather!
Nobodys gonna cover this.
I suspect the opposite. When we are deep in recession people will be looking to get rid of Obama.
Who is in charge of impeaching? That's right, Congress...
Who is in charge of Congress? That's right, Obama's ilk...
Who in the Congressional Democratic fold would vote FOR impeachment? That's right...no one.
It's a dead issue till at least 2010.
Perhaps that is why it's getting suppressed for now (here's to hoping at least)...
I am 100% certain they are, and I don’t have an inside scoop at Fox or anywhere else. BUT... I do have a source in Homeland Security, and what that source tells me is that all of DC is covering it up, including the SCOTUS. They think its safer to have an Ursurper in power than it is to toss his ass in Jail where it belongs. Damn the “Riots” that the left has threatened us with. Nothing that OholyO does is LEGAL and that has HUGE ramifications. Not to mention no nation will abide by a damn thing he signs.
LMAO.... nope API said all along its source was Michelle Obama. Oh and the Imam! Don’t forget the Imam! What ever happened to that guy?
Only when the final verdict is reached. Then it will be “Obama did nothing wrong, says court” or “Court says Obama BC needs released”
it will be a 1-day story in the lame media
No, not congress, at this point it would be SCOTUS, and not Impeachment I don’t think. Its not a legislative issue, I think SCOTUS is the body that rules on legalities, and if Obama isn’t legal.... yea.....
What do you suppose is the reason for this? Are they saving the story for a time when things get much much worse?
We have already suffered a bloodless coup de etat!
We are not about to be taxed into poverty. I was going to go through the closets and cupboards and donate to goodwill the things we don’t use often enough etc but...well now my donatin’ days are over..who knows how things will be in the next year or so..may not be able to replace those wine glasses we are not using at the moment...
Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
That should say we are now not not.. about to be taxes fingeers and the cat helping type causes that error in type..sheesh.
“Then again, Fox is now a leftwing channel..”
I don’t doubt there are some lib commentators on Fox, but “leftwing channel?” C’mon.
If your source KNOWS this to be true and this is coming from inside Fox News, why can’t your source provide the fax numbers?
Then find out from your source what evidence they are sitting on and produce it here. Get it out in public somehow.
Actually, we do have proof that Fox News was suppressing the birth certificate/eligibility issue story.
Ole Chief Editor Korir over at API (African Press International) tried to get Fox News to air the story before the election but failed... It was all “documented” by Chief Editor Korir before the election....
And, by the way, Phil Berg (you know, the one who is trying to get Obama... LOL...) was the lawyer for Chief Editor Korir (for a while, anyway...). And Ed Hale (of Plains Radio) was going to sue Chief Editor Korir for not letting him air the news, instead of trying to get Fox News to do it. As it turned out, Fox “outfoxed” them all and never aired it at all...
[ ... it’s the same old hoax... as usual... ]
ANY ACORN lawyer is no accetable president of mine, I don’t even care anymore.
I figure with all the fradulent/felonious/government teet suckers that voted for Obama, a ‘Constitutional’ lawyer, that seems hell bent on destroying the Constitution, I could go on, but you get the idea.
If you could prove without any doubt that this joker is not qualified to be POTUS, it still would not matter, so... if Fox/Murdock had it, they’d break it.
I digress. If they in fact have proof, break it, don’t be sissys(sp), at least it will cause “something else” to happen, whether it just be aggravation for him, I think it can’t possibly be worse than what we have now, which is a one way ticket to slippery slope he11.
Investigating the President: the Supreme Court and the impeachment process
Martin H. Belsky, University of Akron School of Law
The Constitutional procedure for investigating the President is relatively simple and straightforward. The process begins in the House of Representatives, which shall have the sole Power of Impeachment. As a matter of tradition, the House has employed its Judiciary Committee to investigate and report on charges made against the President. After their recommendation, the House, by majority vote, can refer any or all charges to the Senate for trial. The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. The Chief Justice presides over the trial and conviction requires the vote of two-thirds of those senators present.
I wish you were right, but, unfortunately, Obama has the deck stacked in his favor until at least 2010, or a revolution, whichever comes first (the more I think about it, the more it appears to be a 50/50 prospect)...
If he didn’t have a birth certificate before the election, you can bet your ass he has one now. I am sure the most powerful person in the world can get a piece of paper.
Stop wasting your mind on this, if it ever actually happened, you will know.
When killing the king, you must kill. Wounding is very dangerous.
Patience is a virtue
This is hard to believe. What a big story to suppress. Wouldn’t the ratings go through the roof if they broke the news that the U.S. President is in office illegally? I have to say, I wish this were true.
Yet the story does not appear. It does not appear at all, it has been utterly shut down. It has been spiked! One would think that it would be mentioned at least in passing to maintain the illusion of journalistic credibility but that is not the case. One is compelled to wonder why?
It is possible, I suppose, to credit Murdoch with a patriotic concern that the story has the potential to cast the country into a constitutional crisis at a time when it is fighting two wars abroad, faces potential terrorist attacks at home, and is threatened by the gravest financial crisis at least since the Great Depression. I concede that it is plausible that a man like Maxwell simply might conclude that the country cannot afford to go through a Watergate again, especially at this time of crisis. This is not my view, I think the Constitution must prevail or the contrary is ultimately doomed.
Another possibility is that Murdoch, aware of the pressure brought by Obama's forces against media outlets that cut too close to the quick during the campaign, in fact, they were directly threatened, is intimidated. It could simply be that Murdoch is craven. But Murdoch is not alone, no other outlet has touched the story either. Rush Limbaugh has a great deal of editorial license and he has not touched the story to my knowledge. Why is the reluctance to open the story universal?
It could be that these gatekeepers of our news and opinion have concluded that it is counterproductive to the Republican cause to affiliate itself with a story which is considered by them to be something that can be discussed only when wearing a tinfoil hat. My problem with this is that fastidiousness is hardly the hallmark of media outlets. Indeed, respect for the truth has not always been the North Star for broadcasters such as Dan Rather. It is hard to believe that they would all unanimously shrink from the story because they think it is just bogus. These are hard-bitten men and they surely must understand that the Obama can end this story merely with the production of a $10 document, but he has spent $1 million to avoid doing so. These men must surely smell a rat. Why are they not personally curious?
I do not know the answers to these conundrums. I would be grateful to hear other opinions.
Maybe that is his super duper top secret source?
I'm not doubting you but would like to know.
I’ll guarantee you, there are those on Free Republic, who will tell you (in no uncertain terms) that they do *not* need an Impeachment process to get Obama out of office.
They will tell you that all that is needed, is for a judge to issue a court order for Obama to vacate his office (of President of the United States), and order a US Marshal to escort Obama out of the White House, and that’s all it will take (I’m *serious* — there are several FReepers who say that is all that is necessary).
FURTHERMORE, there are other FReepers who will tell you that if they can’t find *one judge* in the entire country to do the above — then — the U.S. Military will take things into their own hands — and surround the White House with tanks until they get Obama out of office (yes, I’m serious, there are Freepers who believe this...).
So, there you go... LOL...
“...I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source within the Fox Network...”
Let me guess - Africa Press International
If it turned out that Obama is not eligible and that Biden knew it all along... both of them would be gone... which would make Nancy Pelosi president.
I think we would be better off waiting until 2010 when we can regain the house (which will happen because Obama is tanking the country.)
It could be that the PTBs just consider it just another conspiracy theory like 9/11 truthers (not saying it is, just their mindset). It has hit some news, just doesn’t give a lot of attention. Even this week I saw a five second blurb on Fox mentioning the suit, but not the hour upon hour they give some lost kid de’jour.
I disagree, he is not eligible, therefore he not the POTUS and the election becomes void. Impeachment is not even necessary.
Obama is as phony as those Kennedy dollars with his picture pasted on them.
But I would ultimately agree with your point that the Constitution must be upheld at all costs, but it appears Murdoch and the Democratic Party (suprise!) has a backbone to uphold the Constitution over their company or party principles.
If that is indeed true, then we are all in big trouble, for the power has passed away from the people.
Not if SCOTUS simply throws out the election results. He was never eligible for the Office he was running for.
I intended to change my tag line and forgot.
I’ll remedy that
I intended to change my tag line and forgot.
I’ll remedy that
The Drive-By Media; Obama has never and will never, in our eyes, do anything wrong.
Do you get paid to piss on and interupt threads on this issue?
The only way to change that is for the House to impeach him (snowballs in hell stand a better chance of survival), and the Senate to try him.
If the Senate concludes, like many people believe, he indeed is NOT a natural born citizen, THEN, and only then, regrettable, could he be removed from the office he is currently disgracing.
That would be upholding the Constitution, as the framers' intended it.
I just wish enough elected official had the backbone to put Constitution over party. They don't.
However, like my tagline, I hope for recovery!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.