Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Hitler's Stealth Fighter" Re-created (NatGeo TV Sunday June 28th)
National Geographic ^ | 6/25/2009 | Nat Geo

Posted on 06/26/2009 4:37:21 AM PDT by Dallas59

ON TV Hitler's Stealth Fighter airs Sunday, June 28, at 9 p.m. ET/PT on the National Geographic Channel. About the show >>

Top stealth-plane experts have re-created a radical, nearly forgotten Nazi aircraft: the Horten 2-29, a retro-futuristic fighter that arrived too late in World War II to make it into mass production. (See Hitler's stealth fighter in pictures.)

The engineers' goal was to determine whether the so-called stealth fighter was truly radar resistant. In the process, they've uncovered new clues to just how close Nazi engineers were to unleashing a jet that some say could have changed the course of the war.

To replicate the Ho 2-29 late last year for a documentary premiering Sunday, a team from the Northrop Grumman defense-contracting corporation used original Nazi blueprints (re-created blueprints of Hitler's stealth fighter) and the only surviving Ho 2-29, which has been stored in a U.S. government facility for more than 50 years.

The all-wing Ho 2-29 looked more like today's U.S. B-2 bomber (B-2 bomber picture)—or something from a Star Wars prequel—than like any other World War II aircraft. Made primarily of wood and powered by jet engines, the plane was designed for speeds of up to 600 miles an hour (970 kilometers an hour).

(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; History; Science
KEYWORDS: aerospace; banglist; godsgravesglyphs; hitler; jet; plane; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last



1 posted on 06/26/2009 4:37:22 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Germany was way ahead of it’s time...Genius mixed with tyranny and horror.


2 posted on 06/26/2009 4:44:28 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

3 posted on 06/26/2009 4:44:37 AM PDT by SolidWood (Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Yes and I hear DaVinci invented the helicopter as well...
It looks to me like it had no chance of flying without a tail in the design and lake of computers to control wing surfaces in flight.


4 posted on 06/26/2009 4:45:05 AM PDT by Woodman ("The law is a funny thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

I suspect they would never achieved great success for the same reasons our early flying wings failed. They would have needed modern computers to make the second by second tiny adjustments that are required to keep them in the air.


5 posted on 06/26/2009 4:45:44 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Woodman
lake = lack, jees’ i need to wake up before posting.
6 posted on 06/26/2009 4:47:23 AM PDT by Woodman ("The law is a funny thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Kromagg science from across the dimensions.


7 posted on 06/26/2009 4:48:00 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Made primarily of wood and powered by jet engines, the plane was designed for speeds of up to 600 miles an hour (970 kilometers an hour).

I'm still shaking my head after reading that sentence.

8 posted on 06/26/2009 4:50:07 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Woodman

I thought “lake” was used as a synonym for “a whole bunch of”. ;-)


9 posted on 06/26/2009 4:50:53 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Maybe I should just blame it on Speel khecer like usual...
10 posted on 06/26/2009 4:52:31 AM PDT by Woodman ("The law is a funny thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Woodman
It looks to me like it had no chance of flying without a tail in the design and lake of computers to control wing surfaces in flight.

"That had been tried before and failed time and time again," Lee said. "Reimar Horten took the idea further and made it more practical than any other designer really up until the B-2."

"A Ho 2-29 prototype made a successful test flight just before Christmas 1944."
11 posted on 06/26/2009 4:53:49 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

The problem is that a successful test flight does not mean a successful plane and weapons platform. We also flew flying wings on successful test flights but lots of times they weren’t.

If I’m not mistaken Edwards Air Force Base is named for a pilot killed during a test flight of a flying wing design.


12 posted on 06/26/2009 5:01:20 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Kromagg science from across the dimensions.

You, Sir or Madam, are a Trufan. And if they hadn't oiled the damn gate, the series would have ended three years earlier and a whole lot better. harumph!

13 posted on 06/26/2009 5:01:42 AM PDT by 50sDad (The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
In the process, they've uncovered new clues to just how close Nazi engineers were to unleashing a jet that some say could have changed the course of the war.

Not likely. There are those little pesky details of not having any fuel, or of being able to get time to train pilots in how to fly the things, or of not having airbases not under constant attack.

It takes more to control the skies than a superior aircraft.

14 posted on 06/26/2009 5:05:05 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles, reality wins all the wars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

“That had been tried before and failed time and time again,” Lee said. “Reimar Horten took the idea further and made it more practical than any other designer really up until the B-2.”

Jack Northrop (if he was still alive) might dispute that comment. The B36 and YB49 must have been at least as successful as the German plane. Somewhere I have a large poster of the YB49 in flight over the California desert...

hh


15 posted on 06/26/2009 5:10:36 AM PDT by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
The American military won World War II because of the massive industrial base this nation developed, starting before the Civil War. The latter war was won by the North for the same reasons. Germany also had a massive industrial base, but due to Hitler's extreme ambitions and the constant bombardment of German manufacturing plants by the Americans and the British, that base was greatly weakened by the time the so-called wonder weapons came around for mass production. As the article points out, Germany had run out of time and resources by the time these prototypes were ready.

Fast forward to 2009. American policy makers worry about rogue nations like Iran and North Korea, and radical Muslim terrorists, and rightly so. However, there is general myopia about the fact that the rogue nations and the terrorists are sponsored by China and Russia. With the shrinkage of our own industrial base for a number of reasons, I must wonder if we could sustain a massive ground and naval war like the two World Wars. Additionally, given the general dumbing down of the American populace, our long term ability to keep ahead of the Russians and the Chinese in nuclear weapons and electronic and computer technology must be questioned.

Unless these questions can be addressed successfully, America's future as a superpower is in doubt. Britain and Spain lost their superpower status due to the myopia of their leadership and misguided foreign policy. Is it our turn in this century to suffer the same fate?

16 posted on 06/26/2009 5:12:54 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Woodman
As Jack Northrup found out a few years later. The thing would of been impossible to fly.
17 posted on 06/26/2009 5:13:58 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Bump for later when I’m at home so I can swipe that picture.


18 posted on 06/26/2009 5:14:45 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

The Me 262 proved that. At its given role of bomber interception, it was fast enough and heavily-armed enough that it would be largely invulnerable to fighter escort—it could just sweep past the Mustangs and Thunderbolts, blast bombers with those four big 30mm cannon, and fly away. But there weren’t enough of them, there weren’t enough skilled pilots to fly them, and those that did see service were vulnerable during takeoff and landing from the long paved strips that they needed (and were easily spotted by Allied fighters). Plus the 262’s engines had an average life of 10 flying hours before they fell apart.

When a good pilot got a hold of an Me 262, it was a fearsome combination (witness the record of Jagdverband 44, the “air unit of the aces”). But the odds were way too stacked against Germany by that point.

I remember being able to fly the Go 229 in the old Lucasarts PC game “Secrets of the Luftwaffe,” a long time ago. They modeled it with the alleged performance figures that Horten and Gotha (the manufacturer) gave, so it really basically was a superfighter.

}:-)4


19 posted on 06/26/2009 5:15:46 AM PDT by Moose4 (Palin/some guy who can keep it in his pants 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Woodman; All
The Horten brothers were certainly ahead of their time and a prototype actually flew a couple of times in December 1944, and it eventually achieved a speed of nearly 500 mph (800 km/h). After about two hours of flying time, it was destroyed in a February 1945 crash that killed its test pilot.

This radio-controlled model seems to fly well enough.

Horten Ho 229 V1 (R/C Model)

20 posted on 06/26/2009 5:16:40 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
I agree. I could fold a paper airplane that is "designed for speeds of up to ..." (choose your own speed). If I got 5 mph out of it, I would have made a correct statement.

There was a "History Channel" program a while back that was ever so breathless about the 'potential' for late Nazi Germany technology. I turned it off when they postulated that if the war had gone just a few months longer, they might have WON! STUPIDITY of course, but it sells programs.

Frankly, I will agree that the German / Nazi machine did come up with some really great stuff but given that the USofA was CANCELING military construction from 1944 onwards, a few super planes and tanks wouldn't have made that much difference. A very good exposition on this came as an SciFi story by Arthur C Clarke "Superiority (1951)" [full story at link] detailing how he sees 'quantity having a quality of its own'.

21 posted on 06/26/2009 5:17:20 AM PDT by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Germany also lost the war because it could not produce the portable energy (gasoline and diesel) that its armed forces needed to prosecute the war. They were extremely short on domestically produced crude oil. Does that sound familiar too?
22 posted on 06/26/2009 5:17:29 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

Germany has no resources to speak of, and its vaunted industrial base allowed it to start WW2 with horse-drawn artillery and no long-range bomber. Germany was doomed from the start (but it put up a hell of a fight).


23 posted on 06/26/2009 5:18:04 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
to start WW2 with horse-drawn artillery and no long-range bomber

Hitler originally was going to start the war in 1946, but when he learned he had Parkinson's and would be dead before then, he decided to start right away so he could run the war.

Many of the things the military needed were not ready, but he knew he lacked time.

24 posted on 06/26/2009 5:33:52 AM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Japanese Zero’s had a lot of wood in them.


25 posted on 06/26/2009 5:49:34 AM PDT by Woebama (Paying for my neighbor's mortgage and Wall Street's bonuses sure is hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Germany also lost the war because, in the words of an old guy I knew said one evening after a couple of beers at the end of a certain movie, “They all got themselves KILT, or captured.”


26 posted on 06/26/2009 5:53:01 AM PDT by OKSooner ("He's quite mad, you know." - Sean Connery to Honor Blackman in "Goldfinger".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
Try it again:

Germany also lost the war because, as an old guy I knew said one evening after a couple of beers at the end of a certain movie, "They all got themselves KILT, or captured."

27 posted on 06/26/2009 5:54:17 AM PDT by OKSooner ("He's quite mad, you know." - Sean Connery to Honor Blackman in "Goldfinger".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

As my granddad used to say.

Stalin sure used up a lot of germans, He used up a lot of russians too.


28 posted on 06/26/2009 5:55:42 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Samwise; alfa6; SAMWolf

Ping


29 posted on 06/26/2009 5:57:51 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (What would Reagan do? Not go for freakin ice cream!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Hitlers engineers could have easily built a computer assisted system to fly this aircraft. It was the early concept of a larger flying wing that was to have been built to deliver atomic bombs to strike American cities.

The YB aircraft that we built were based upon these concepts, actually the Skunk Works used a lot of WW2 other nation concepts.

Whats a good conspiracy story is why the YB project was canceled, all blueprints destroyed and all aircraft pieces destroyed as well. Why? Because it DID work and was probably a platform that was so efficient that the US Government was so afraid another country would build it that they decided to keep it off the production lines for decades.


30 posted on 06/26/2009 6:00:59 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosier hick
Jack Northrop (if he was still alive) might dispute that comment. The B36 and YB49 must have been at least as successful as the German plane. Somewhere I have a large poster of the YB49 in flight over the California desert...

The problem with the B-49 was that they took the piston-engined B-35 design (which would have been successful) and replaced the piston/prop engines with jet engines without giving enough thought to engineering nuances of making the swap-out. They literally took B-35 airframes, cut out the piston engines and dropped jets in.

Northrop's earlier sub-scale flying wing prototypes were successful. In fact, the N9M was restored to flying condition and flown regularly until an engine failure in early 2006: Wiki Article
31 posted on 06/26/2009 6:03:51 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

Germany lost the war ‘cause they started a fight with 3 major nations, each of which had more industrial output and more population than Germany.
That they managed to take down one (France) and hold the remaining two (the UK and the USSR) at bay was near miraculous (and evidence of good planning and military doctrine on the part of the Germans). But when a fourth (the US) joined in, it was all over but counting the casualties and clearing the wreckage.


32 posted on 06/26/2009 6:05:01 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
...they've uncovered new clues to just how close Nazi engineers were to unleashing a jet that some say could have changed the course of the war.

That's because "some" are idiots. They overlook the allied industrial base and the game of aeronautical one-upsmanship we played everytime the Germans rolled out something formidable. Then there's that little matter of the P-80 Shooting Star and the Gloucester Meteor, both of which had protopyes in existence by 1944 and which could have been mass produced if necessary. Just as fast or faster than the Horton, and not made of wood.

33 posted on 06/26/2009 6:07:12 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus

The Gloster Meteor saw some limited service in WWII, protecting the UK from Buzz bombs.
However, it is important realize the range limitation. Jets wouldn’t meet jets mostly because the Allied jets didn’t have the range to escort bombers or run sweeps in Germany. German jets, with a few exceptions, served primarily as interceptors.


34 posted on 06/26/2009 6:19:53 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
WWII Real Time strategy game...


*Hitler[AoE] has joined the game.*
*Eisenhower has joined the game.*
*paTTon has joined the game.*
*Churchill has joined the game.*
*benny-tow has joined the game.*
*T0J0 has joined the game.*
*Roosevelt has joined the game.*
*Stalin has joined the game.*
*deGaulle has joined the game.*
Roosevelt: hey sup
T0J0: y0
Stalin: hi
Churchill: hi
Hitler[AoE]: cool, i start with panzer tanks!
paTTon: lol more like panzy tanks
T0JO: lol
Roosevelt: o this fockin sucks i got a depression!
benny-tow: haha america sux
Stalin: hey hitler you dont fight me i dont fight u, cool?
Hitler[AoE]; sure whatever
Stalin: cool
deGaulle: **** Hitler rushed some1 help
Hitler[AoE]: lol byebye frenchy
Roosevelt: i dont got **** to help, sry
Churchill: wtf the luftwaffle is attacking me
Roosevelt: get antiair guns
Churchill: i cant afford them
benny-tow: u n00bs know what team talk is?
paTTon: stfu
Roosevelt: o yah hit the navajo button guys
deGaulle: eisenhower ur worthless come help me quick
Eisenhower: i cant do **** til rosevelt gives me an army
paTTon: yah hurry the fock up
Churchill: d00d im gettin pounded
deGaulle: this is fockin weak u guys suck
*deGaulle has left the game.*
Roosevelt: im gonna attack the axis k?
benny-tow: with what? ur wheelchair?
benny-tow: lol did u mess up ur legs AND ur head?
Hitler[AoE]: ROFLMAO
T0J0: lol o no america im comin 4 u
Roosevelt: wtf! thats bullsh1t u fags im gunna kick ur asses T0JO: not without ur harbors u wont! lol
Roosevelt: u little biotch ill get u
Hitler[AoE]: wtf
Hitler[AoE]: america hax, u had depression and now u got a huge fockin army
Hitler[AoE]: thats bullsh1t u hacker
Churchill: lol no more france for u hitler
Hitler[AoE]: tojo help me!
T0J0: wtf u want me to do, im on the other side of the world retard
Hitler[AoE]: fine ill clear you a path
Stalin: WTF u arsshoel! WE HAD A FoCKIN TRUCE
Hitler[AoE]: i changed my mind lol
benny-tow: haha
benny-tow: hey ur losing ur guys in africa im gonna need help in italy soon sum1
T0J0: o **** i cant help u i got my hands full
Hitler[AoE]: im 2 busy 2 help
Roosevelt: yah thats right ***** im comin for ya
Stalin: church help me
Churchill: like u helped me before? sure ill just sit here
Stalin: dont be an arss
Churchill: dont be a commie. oops too late
Eisenhower: LOL
benny-tow: hahahh oh sh1t help
Hitler: o man ur focked
paTTon: oh what now biotch
Roosevelt: whos the cripple now lol
*benny-tow has been eliminated.*
benny-tow: lame
Roosevelt: gj patton
paTTon: thnx
Hitler[AoE]: WTF eisenhower hax hes killing all my sh1t
Hitler[AoE]: quit u hacker so u dont ruin my record
Eisenhower: Nuts!
benny~tow: wtf that mean?
Eisenhower: meant to say nutsack lol finger slipped
paTTon: coming to get u hitler u paper hanging hun cocksocker
Stalin: rofl
T0J0: HAHAHHAA
Hitler[AoE]: u guys are fockin gay
Hitler[AoE]: ur never getting in my city
*Hitler[AoE] has been eliminated.*
benny~tow: OMG u noob you killed yourself
Eisenhower: ROFLOLOLOL
Stalin: OMG LMAO!
Hitler[AoE]: WTF i didnt click there omg this game blows
*Hitler[AoE] has left the game*
paTTon: hahahhah
T0J0: WTF my teammates are n00bs
benny~tow: shut up noob
Roosevelt: haha wut a moron
paTTon: wtf am i gunna do now?
Eisenhower: yah me too
T0J0: why dont u attack me o thats right u dont got no ships lololol
Eisenhower: fock u
paTTon: lemme go thru ur base commie
Stalin: go to hell lol
paTTon: fock this sh1t im goin afk
Eisenhower: yah this is gay
*Roosevelt has left the game.*
Hitler[AoE]: wtf?
Eisenhower: sh1t now we need some1 to join
*tru_m4n has joined the game.*
tru_m4n: hi all
T0J0: hey
Stalin: sup
Churchill: hi
tru_m4n: OMG OMG OMG i got all his stuff!
tru_m4n: NUKES! HOLY **** I GOT NUKES
Stalin: d00d gimmie some plz
tru_m4n: no way i only got like a couple
Stalin: omg dont be gay gimmie nuculer secrets
T0J0: wtf is nukes?
T0J0: holy ****holy****hoyl****!
*T0J0 has been eliminated.*
*The Allied team has won the game!*
Eisenhower: awesome!
Churchill: gg noobs no re
T0J0: thats bull**** u fockin suck
*T0J0 has left the game.*
*Eisenhower has left the game.*
Stalin: next game im not going to be on ur team, u guys didnt help me for ****
Churchill: wutever, we didnt need ur help neway dumbarss tru_m4n: l8r all
benny~tow: bye
Churchill: l8r
Stalin: fock u all
tru_m4n: shut up commie lol
*tru_m4n has left the game.*
benny~tow: lololol u commie
Churchill: ROFL
Churchill: bye commie
*Churchill has left the game.*
*benny~tow has left the game.*
Stalin: i hate u all fags
*Stalin has left the game.*
paTTon: lol no1 is left
paTTon: weeeee i got a jeep
*paTTon has been eliminated.*
paTTon: o sh1t!
*paTTon has left the game.*

35 posted on 06/26/2009 6:22:15 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Whats a good conspiracy story is why the YB project was canceled, all blueprints destroyed and all aircraft pieces destroyed as well. Why? Because it DID work and was probably a platform that was so efficient that the US Government was so afraid another country would build it that they decided to keep it off the production lines for decades.

More likely that Convair had better connections in DC and the USAF than the somewhat upstart Northrop did, and didn't like the threat the B-49 posed to their B-36.
36 posted on 06/26/2009 6:23:15 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
I remember being able to fly the Go 229 in the old Lucasarts PC game “Secrets of the Luftwaffe,”

I'm not a Gamer, but Jesu, what great detail went into that game! Back about 1991 I played around with it on a 386-20 with no joystick. What got me was the detail - for instance, you could bail out and by using the down arrow, pan down to look at the scenery coming up.

One session had you flying on a B-17 mission. The planes had nose art but I couldn't make them out - program wouldn't let me get close enough. A buddy of mine flew a P-51 on the same mission, and was able to get in close enough to make out the artwork. Just amazing. (When I watch the ending of "Best Years of Our Lives", I almost let out a cry of anguish when I see all the parked B-17s with their nose art and missions, waiting to be scrapped. What a historical loss!)

I also found out something interesting about myself. I decided to play a ME-109 pilot and attack said B-17s. As I came in, all I could think about was the dozens of pictures I had seen of those big birds going down with their crews. Man, I locked up and couldn't make the attack. What to do? I flew back to the base and crashed the plane into the hangar. Wish I had that old machine and game now.

37 posted on 06/26/2009 6:25:57 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
"A Ho 2-29 prototype made a successful test flight just before Christmas 1944."

Flight is not the problem. Anything with rockets strapped to it can fly. It's a successful landing that makes the difference.

38 posted on 06/26/2009 6:26:28 AM PDT by BubbaBasher ("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Sadly for decades the Airforce was ruled by macho image jocks, the most successful aircraft in history were often condemned because they did not seem “manly”.The P-38 first came to my mind. And to an extent it happens to this day, the Thunderbolt II “Warthog” was despised because it looked like an aberration, but as we all know its a highly effective attack airframe.


39 posted on 06/26/2009 6:28:48 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Sadly for decades the Airforce was ruled by macho image jocks, the most successful aircraft in history were often condemned because they did not seem “manly”.The P-38 first came to my mind. And to an extent it happens to this day, the Thunderbolt II “Warthog” was despised because it looked like an aberration, but as we all know its a highly effective attack airframe.

Not just successful aircraft. Not only did Convair and the USAF get the B-49 killed to perpetuate the B-36, they also took out the Navy's first supercarrier (CVB-58, the USS United States), spurring what was called "the revolt of the Admirals".

(Then again, based on what I've seen, the USS United States would not have been a successful design as laid-down. Even the USS Forrestal, started years later, required substantial design changes prior to completion.)
40 posted on 06/26/2009 6:44:24 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
I don't think the outcome of WWII was as inevitable as you make it sound. If Germany had more submarines to deploy in the Atlantic in 1939, and had it been only a little further along in submarine development at the start of the war, the industrial capacity of the United States would have been irrelevant, and Britain, for lack of food and supplies, would have been strangled into submission.
41 posted on 06/26/2009 6:54:45 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59; Larry Lucido; martin_fierro; Tijeras_Slim; dighton; Travis T. OJustice; ...

She'll fly a lot faster if they remove that giant steel cone from her belly.

42 posted on 06/26/2009 6:57:03 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

That’s classic.


43 posted on 06/26/2009 7:07:04 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
She'll fly a lot faster if they remove that giant steel cone from her belly.

And I bet that tail gunner gets pretty cold from the wind whipping around him. Seems like painting his station red sure isn't very stealthy either.

44 posted on 06/26/2009 7:07:05 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (You can never have too much cowbell !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

I’ve always thought that the P-38 was the greatest looking airplane in the war.
Getting Yamamoto was the icing on the cake for that aircraft.


45 posted on 06/26/2009 8:30:12 AM PDT by gigster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

There are modern planes today made of playwood.


46 posted on 06/26/2009 8:32:53 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

Yep, it is wasn’t sharp and pointy they didn’t want it. Hence, we had really bad aircraft throughout the 50’s and 60’s. Fast, but not very good at anything. Remember the Air Force fought even using the F-16 until budget cuts caused them to rethink that position.


47 posted on 06/26/2009 8:35:14 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV
I don't know if the snorkeling subs could have saved Germany. Remember, When the US joined the war we were already developing more advanced weapons and transports to defeat or get around the Uboats or even wage war against Europe and Japan from the continental US. They could have delayed victory and raised the cost in blood and treasure, but I don't know if they could won the war. It would depend on how long it took the American population to get war-weary (about 5 minutes, these days, but a lot longer back then...).
48 posted on 06/26/2009 8:38:42 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

The British Mosquito was made of wood.


49 posted on 06/26/2009 9:14:28 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (What would Reagan do? Not go for freakin ice cream!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Wood was used for a number of designs because it wasn’t a strategic material; Germany used up a lot of metal in its war effort. Metals shortages pulled the plug on the A-10 terror rocket project, which had as its goal bombing New York City. The A-9 warhead/spacecraft loaded with high explosives (and presumably, eventually a nuclear weapon) would have been live piloted, and after terminal trajectory was locked in (and sufficiently low altitude), the pilot was to bail out, parachute into the ocean, and be picked up by U-boat. :’)

The obvious alternative (hindsight being 20-20) would have been A) not invading the USSR, or at least not in 1940, and B) concentrating on domination of the Mediterranean, finishing off the British in N Africa and the Suez Canal, and shutting down the British navy by denying them petroleum. Imagine the level of carnage had the resources used in the eastern campaign been diverted first to N Africa and the Med, and then to a terror missile campaign against a starving home island.


50 posted on 06/26/2009 9:17:30 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson