Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orly Taitz - Motion to Transfer Carter Case to Judge Lamberth in Washington DC
American Grand Jury ^ | December 26th, 2009

Posted on 12/26/2009 4:27:01 AM PST by Man50D

AGJ comment: we spilt the Motion up into the key parts so our readers could quickly see what Orly is asking Judge Carter to agree to.

AGJ comment: The US Attorneys representing Obama said Carter could not hear the case BECAUSE of Jurisdiction. They maintained that only a court in Washington DC could hear the case because Obama resided in Washington. Orly agreed! — Wow!

AGJ comment: Bottom line, Orly made a brilliant move. By agreeing to what Obama’s Attorneys argued for they cannot now go back on their request. Orly in effect called their bluff. Now the case should rightfully move to Washington DC. If Judge Carter tries to deny the Motion he will lose complete credibility with the court and be subject to appeal — If Carter rules in favor of the Motion it is an important win for our side — Obama is still in the “hot seat” and Orly deserves a lot of credit for hanging in there — In our humble opinion.

One Response to “Orly Taitz - Motion to Transfer Carter Case to Judge Lamberth in Washington DC”

1. French Canadian Says: December 26th, 2009 at 3:34 am

Go Orly, go! This is one tenacious woman!

“Victory belongs to the most persevering”. Napoleon Bonaparte.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: americangrandjury; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; orly; orlytaitz; taitz; thebrit; thecanadian; thecuban; theindonesian; thekenyan; whackamole; where0hwhere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

1 posted on 12/26/2009 4:27:04 AM PST by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

May the force be with you Dr. Taitz.

In the last month the tide has changed politically and socially against Obama, now is the time for actions that can legally expose him for what he isn’t.

With a growing public anger at bribes and kickbacks I have a strong feeling that any future court cases should proceed.

These judges are not stupid, they do not want accusations against them now.


2 posted on 12/26/2009 4:33:53 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Phobos, kerdos, and doxa, said the Time Traveler. “Fear, self-interest, and honor.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

I don’t know anything about Dr Orly T. and I know people here have been less than kind, but you have admire the Dr’s tenacity
Reminds me of my terrier; she may be small, but don’t try and take something away from her-you’re in for quite the struggle!


3 posted on 12/26/2009 4:46:09 AM PST by homegroan (ZQczar...happily addicted to the Refresh Button.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: homegroan

I hope she gets more financial help, with the Obamacare issue she may have the answer to counter it or at least postpone it for enough time due to any decisions or investigations into Obamas qualifications to sign it into law, which he can not do legally.


4 posted on 12/26/2009 4:50:03 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Phobos, kerdos, and doxa, said the Time Traveler. “Fear, self-interest, and honor.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

I have little confidence in our federal judges as I am sure Orly has shown US the reasons why . Orly ,,, you are a GRAND PATRIOT and I’m proud to have you in our country . KEEP ON TRUCKIN’ girl .


5 posted on 12/26/2009 5:00:24 AM PST by lionheart 247365 (-:{ GLEN BECK is 0bama's TRANSPARENCY CZAR }:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Bump


6 posted on 12/26/2009 5:03:37 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
“Victory belongs to the most persevering”. Napoleon Bonaparte.

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein.

7 posted on 12/26/2009 5:06:30 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Let’s all support Dr. Orly and join oathkeepers.com


8 posted on 12/26/2009 5:16:33 AM PST by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: manonCANAL
Let’s all support Dr. Orly and join oathkeepers.com

Knock yourself out.

9 posted on 12/26/2009 5:17:29 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: manonCANAL

Sorry I meant oathkeepers.org
Just got up, brain still asleep.


10 posted on 12/26/2009 5:24:30 AM PST by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: manonCANAL

ok I knock myself out


11 posted on 12/26/2009 5:26:23 AM PST by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; LucyT; STARWISE; rxsid; Seizethecarp; pissant; Red Steel

ping


12 posted on 12/26/2009 6:11:37 AM PST by circumbendibus (Where's the Birth Certificate? Quo Warranto in 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It may not go anywhere, but I am very glad there is this constant drumbeat always in the background.


13 posted on 12/26/2009 6:17:47 AM PST by NOBO2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

GO ORLY GO............


14 posted on 12/26/2009 6:45:37 AM PST by deport (72 DAYS UNTIL THE TEXAS PRIMARY....... MARCH 2, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Good luck, Orly. May this case be the one....


15 posted on 12/26/2009 6:48:28 AM PST by azishot (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Here we go again. After watching her in action these last few months, do you ever wonder whose side she is on? I know nothing of the law, so she may have a game plan that I don't see. But...

Given her success rate, her personality and general knowledge of the law and procedure, assuming she isn't working for him, so far she has been a gift to obama.

I know she has a loyal following here, but why? She does seem to be one of the very few doing what the many want to see done, but what are her results? This is important. I just don't think she is the right dentist for this job.

16 posted on 12/26/2009 6:57:46 AM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Are we all just whistling in the wind here? No one wants this any more than I do, but I’m afraid it will go nowhere. I think the judges are afraid to take REAL action, and maybe it’s a fear of a constitutional crisis, maybe it’s a fear of Chicago politicians, maybe a few of rioting. Something is holding them back.


17 posted on 12/26/2009 7:11:21 AM PST by txboss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txboss

They may be forced out in the open to do the right thing.


18 posted on 12/26/2009 7:33:32 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
This has become our version of “Bush was selected president.”

A small vocal minority pushing a useless cause.

People all up in arms about his birth certificate, while in the meantime, he's signing into law the kind of legislation that may never be reversed.

His Justice department is investigating everything and everybody associated with the Republican party, while protecting ACORN and Black Panther Party voter intimidation...but hey...that Hawaii birth certificate...something fishy about it.

Nothin’ but a distraction.

19 posted on 12/26/2009 7:40:58 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein.

So..... just QUIT... right? The definition of loser is too just become a quitter when your dream gets too tough.

20 posted on 12/26/2009 7:55:43 AM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: azishot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royce_C._Lamberth


21 posted on 12/26/2009 7:59:19 AM PST by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: txboss
Are we all just whistling in the wind here? No one wants this any more than I do, but I’m afraid it will go nowhere. I think the judges are afraid to take REAL action, and maybe it’s a fear of a constitutional crisis, maybe it’s a fear of Chicago politicians, maybe a few of rioting. Something is holding them back.

Fear... yeah that's good, Lets all be afraid... just like Patrick Henry and the signers of the Declaration of Independence. /sarc

I've been here at Free Republic since 1997 ... I've noticed a definite change... now we're overrun by "Fearful" posters who love to complain but haven't the cojones to fight for principle or even their liberty.

22 posted on 12/26/2009 8:06:37 AM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GBA
I just don't think she is the right dentist for this job.

Hey.. why don't YOU go for it... Dentist! /sarc

BIG TALK is so cheap... Quitters always are full of big talk.

23 posted on 12/26/2009 8:11:00 AM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
This has become our version of “Bush was selected president.” A small vocal minority pushing a useless cause. People all up in arms about his birth certificate, while in the meantime, he's signing into law the kind of legislation that may never be reversed. His Justice department is investigating everything and everybody associated with the Republican party, while protecting ACORN and Black Panther Party voter intimidation...but hey...that Hawaii birth certificate...something fishy about it. Nothin’ but a distraction.

Hmmm another one... yeah, just sit down and so nothing. "Useless" causes are always considered a waste of time by the human breed of sheep. Yeah... our Liberty is being dismantled completely... "Oh woe is me. /sarc

24 posted on 12/26/2009 8:18:07 AM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
A small vocal minority pushing a useless cause.

Assuming for arguments sake you are it is a minority, keep in mind only 30% of the colonists supported the Revolution when it began while 70% were either apathetic or supported Great Britain.

What is your alternative for his violation of the Constitution? Sit back and do nothing?
25 posted on 12/26/2009 8:24:40 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: txboss
“Are we all just whistling in the wind here?”

Pending replies from actual lawyers I will offer that this will likely go nowhere.

From memory, Orly's ability to file additional motions was cut off five days before the Oct 5 hearing, and the case was dismissed “with prejudice” meaning don't even try to file another motion with the court on this case...go directly to an appeal or to another court.

Orly's case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, including failure to state a claim that the court can remedy and failure to complete service timely (before inauguration). All of this would still be true in DC except for the quo warranto part.

Orly is misleading the bench intentionally or unintentionally when she claims that the defense argued that DC was the correct jurisdiction for this case. DOJ argured that DC was the correct venue for quo warranto, but argued that quo warranto didn't apply to the POTUS.

Judge Carter disagreed in his ruling and said that DC actually was the correct venue for quo warranto for the POTUS, which made D’Onofrio’s day.

To me this means that Orly's motion here is pointless and her correct action is to re-file from scratch in DC for quo warranto with only the candidates who were on the ballot with Obama as plaintiffs and without including any of the other issues that are still on appeal by Kreep in CA. For Orly to try to get DC Circuit to re-litigate the non-quo warranto part of the case with all of the military plaintifs all over on a transfer would appear to be blatant forum shopping.

26 posted on 12/26/2009 8:35:43 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bob Eimiller
BIG TALK is so cheap... Quitters always are full of big talk.

I'm asking serious questions and you're going drama queen. Is this your first day? Have you been following the Orly saga? "Quitters"?

I admit there is a bit of the theatrical in Orly vs obama. The plucky, winsome Russian dentist/lawyer fighting for the Constitution against obama and the evil Chicago Machine, but the reality is quite serious.

No one wants to know the real obama story more than I do, where ever he was born or who is parents really are and the many details of his scholastic trail. Despite the demonrat's effort to mischaracterize it as folly, I see it as very serious and it doesn't distract me from the other serious obama/demonrat schemes underway. I can multitask. This is serious enough all by itself to not give up on it. But...Orly? Have you ever thought that we've already seen her best game?

27 posted on 12/26/2009 9:01:27 AM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Orly still believe Justice is blind. The democrats and their fascist/socialist minions now run the nation. She will never find fairness in the court system, as she naively believes. Dr. Taitz may not be the best person to run this gamut of bastards but I don't see any others making the level of effort she is making, so we go with what we have, friend.

BTW, has it yet occurred to you that the current oval office sitter is using an alias while holding office? His last legal, known name was Barry Soetoro ... and he has several social security numbers in his current alias. Which one would you like to address?

28 posted on 12/26/2009 9:07:29 AM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Agreed. She is apparently the only one we know about and you bring up more reasons for people to know the truth about obama.

Lets assume, or in my case, believe and agree that obama is hiding something or a whole lot of somethings, so our need to know is great and even Constitutional, but his keeping himself out of the courts is a paramount personal priority.

Given Orly's performance in and out of the courtroom to date, who is she helping more? Her clients and our cause or obama and his? Can't help being a bit suspicious.

29 posted on 12/26/2009 10:33:45 AM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bob Eimiller
So..... just QUIT... right? The definition of loser is too just become a quitter when your dream gets too tough.

In this case I'd suggest that Orly break down and read a legal textbook some time. There is no case to transfer to Judge Lambeth or any other judge. There was a case, Taits argued it, and she lost. Asking for a change in venue after you have lost your case is a bit late. Her next destination is an appeals court, not asking Carter to void his decision and sent the case elsewhere.

30 posted on 12/26/2009 10:54:49 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Ping to Orly’s latest comical endeavor.


31 posted on 12/26/2009 11:04:35 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Eimiller

This Non-Sequitur person you are corresponding with has ABSOLUTELY NO REGARD for TRUTH or INTEGRITY ! He has NO LIFE and spends the majority of his free time sending these comments in a diabolical effort to discourage the faithful.

He is ubdoubtedly the UGLIEST troll on FR, just so you know...best thing to do it IGNORE him, as foolishly persitent as he is !


32 posted on 12/26/2009 11:34:07 AM PST by rocco55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Barnett v. Obama is dead. Dismissed, with prejudice, as of Oct. 29, 2009.

In spite of all the nonsensical filings by Taitz since that date, all of which have been rejected, it's still dead, dead, dead.

She can file an appeal, but she doesn't want to, since that's so dull, and won't get her any headlines, media face time, blog posts or money in her Paypal account.

There's nothing to be transferred to DC, except for a dead corpse.

Anyone who believes otherwise is as delusional as Taitz.

33 posted on 12/26/2009 12:02:41 PM PST by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlo; Non-Sequitur; parsifal; Pilsner; Drew68; curiosity; Sibre Fan; El Sordo; MilspecRob; ...

Thanks, Drew68.

Ping to an Orly Taitz whack-a-mole thread. Orly is so much fun!


34 posted on 12/26/2009 12:12:50 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Orly’s just jealous because Donofrio and Pidgeon have a legitimate client (with standing) and are getting face time and serious consideration on the legal/bankruptcy blogs. She can’t stand not to be the center of attention.


35 posted on 12/26/2009 12:19:56 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
“Orly’s just jealous because Donofrio and Pidgeon have a legitimate client (with standing) and are getting face time and serious consideration on the legal/bankruptcy blogs. She can’t stand not to be the center of attention.”

BT:

If it weren't for Orly and Kreep, D’Onofrio wouldn't have gotten his confirmation from Judge Carter (refuting DOJ) that the POTUS is subject to quo warranto in the DC Circuit!

Taitz and Kreep’s case in CA was most assuredly _not_ a pointless exercise for this reason alone. Also the DOJ quo warranto defense of Obama (claiming it did not apply) was flushed out. Thank you Orly for that!

Orly strikes me as being bipolar with delusions, but these folks can change the world with their fearlessness even if they personally fail. No one has done more to put the issue of potential holes in Obama’s eligibility before the public.

36 posted on 12/26/2009 12:37:32 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GBA; Man50D
"do you ever wonder whose side she is on?"

Because she's an inexperienced lawyer, she's on Barry's side? Other, more experienced lawyer's have gotten no further than she has...to date. Are they all on Barry's side because they have fared no better...to date? Remember, it took a bit more than two years before Watergate forced Nixon to resign. I support all who are attempting to expose the usurper.

37 posted on 12/26/2009 12:45:16 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man; Man50D
" A small vocal minority pushing a useless cause.

People all up in arms about his birth certificate"

Exposing a usurper is never a useless cause.

His father was a foreign national who passed his foreign citizenship on to his son. Assuming Barry was born in HI (yet to be proven), he was born a dual national. A citizen, at birth, of two countries. There's no way the framers intent for the NBC requirement for the Commander in Chief was to allow (post grandfather clause), a citizen of two nations...at birth, to be considered a Natural Born Citizen of these United States.

He's a usurper. He has zero Presidential authority to sign anything, or Command the armed forces to do anything.

38 posted on 12/26/2009 12:50:39 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24344673/LOVE-AND-THE-LAW-Charlie-Orly-December-9-11-2009

http://charleslincoln3.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/light-vanity-insatiate-cormorant-consuming-means-soon-preys-upon-itself/

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The above links are must reading for anyone who wants to know about Orly Taitz...as far as Im concerned the whole batch is nuts


39 posted on 12/26/2009 12:59:36 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Orly strikes me as being bipolar with delusions, but these folks can change the world with their fearlessness even if they personally fail.

Orly's got the failure part down pat.

40 posted on 12/26/2009 1:06:50 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Donofrio didn’t need Judge Carter’s confirmation. Nothing Orly has done has been helpful. She’s single-handedly done more damage to the credibility of the eligibility issue than anyone else.


41 posted on 12/26/2009 1:10:33 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GBA

I stand by my 1st post too you.


42 posted on 12/26/2009 1:39:16 PM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Very subtle!

parsy, who appreciates subtlenicityness


43 posted on 12/26/2009 2:23:21 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

I need to write a country song about Orly:

What part of “dismissed” don’t yah understand.
You filed no appeal, you get no remand.....
“With prejudice” means yah cain’t refile...
So just go pull some teeth for a while...

Yah cain’t do “pro-cedure” if you ain’t a pro.
When the Judge says “dismissed” that’s meaning “no.”
You cain’t put a pulled tooth back in your head.
Yah cain’t transfer a case when it is dead.

Chorus:

So what part of “sanctions”, don’t you understand.
When you ain’t got “standing”, you cain’t stand.
Yor legal fanny has done got “tanned”
The Court’s has charged you twenty grand. . .

parsy, who says “O da li da la da lady whooooo”


44 posted on 12/26/2009 2:33:41 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; parsifal; GBA

I would really appreciate it if someone would comment on the links I provided in # 39. I dont know if this info has been posted elsewhere on FR but it is full of juicy bits.

Dr Charles Lincoln worked directly with, under, and evidently on top of Orly Taitz


45 posted on 12/26/2009 2:44:43 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; Man50D
“Victory belongs to the most persevering”... Napoleon Bonaparte.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein.

__________________________________________________________

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer"... Albert Einstein

STE=Q

46 posted on 12/26/2009 3:02:24 PM PST by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
I need to write a country song about Orly:

Wait a little longer, and you might be able to add a stanza about a visit to the crossbar motel.

But you are off to a good start.

47 posted on 12/26/2009 3:16:16 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I think the AG will give her 2 words this time instead of the single “Nuts”


48 posted on 12/26/2009 3:33:19 PM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Dude appears to be seriously delusional to think Orly would leave her rich husband to be with a dis-barred lawyer.

parsy, who can’t wait to see the Oliver Stone movie of this


49 posted on 12/26/2009 3:53:59 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; circumbendibus; STE=Q; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Thanks, circumbendibus. Apparently this is an important announcement since pests are frantically posting negative comments to anyone wishing to uphold the U.S. Constitution.

The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology defines hate as a "deep, enduring, intense emotion expressing animosity, anger, and hostility towards a person, group, or object." Because hatred is believed to be long-lasting, many psychologists consider it to be more of an attitude or disposition than a temporary emotional state.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatred

Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic

50 posted on 12/26/2009 4:29:35 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson