Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red Dawn' is another casualty due to MGM's financial troubles
Examiner ^ | 06.10.10

Posted on 06/13/2010 6:23:39 AM PDT by Perdogg

Well this should not be a surprise to anyone but Red Dawn is the latest film to be put on hold due to MGM’s financial status. With no executives to control the studio, creditors have placed the responsibility of the once great film company on themselves. This move has affected all the movies it was tied to, from the twenty-third Bond film to The Hobbit. Because of MGM’s financial problems Daniel Craig left Bond 23 for Girl with a Dragon Tatoo and Gullimero Del Toro left The Hobbit.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: babylon; bondjamesbond; hollyweird; mgm; reddawn; snore; thehobbit; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Perdogg

41 posted on 06/13/2010 7:38:15 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaming eagle2
What????? No more Leo roaring on the screen????


42 posted on 06/13/2010 7:38:39 AM PDT by Rufii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Washi

Most people in Hollywood don’t understand what freedom is and wouldn’t do the original movie justice.


43 posted on 06/13/2010 7:43:17 AM PDT by Dayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

A remake would be a watered down movie anyway. PC Hollywood changed Tom Clancy’s The Sum of All Fears from Palestinian Terrorists to Russians to be PC, they’ll neuter a remake of Red Dawn too.

Just as well there’s no remake.


44 posted on 06/13/2010 7:48:20 AM PDT by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Methinks their Chinese overlords were displeased...


45 posted on 06/13/2010 7:50:25 AM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

“Gold star for you”

Hey, maybe some people didn’t know about that...


46 posted on 06/13/2010 7:56:00 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rufii
"The 1923 version of “The Ten Commandments” is considerably different from the 1956 version. I saw it in the 1980’s at the La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles. It was accompanied by a very competent organist who had accompanied films during the silent era."

I'm genuinely envious!

47 posted on 06/13/2010 7:59:47 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: happyathome

I would like Warner Bros. to purchase MGM. They are good about films. After all they own Turner Classic Movies, which is one of my favorite channels.

In addition, TimeWarner already has the rights to pre-1986 MGM films.


48 posted on 06/13/2010 8:02:00 AM PDT by archivist007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out
Who made Independence Day?

Great movie because they blew up DC.

49 posted on 06/13/2010 8:05:56 AM PDT by AGreatPer (America elected a Prince and got a Princess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

There should be an effort to redo some of the classic Ealing Studio comedy films. British comedies with superb story lines that were made on shoestring budgets. Ironically, Ealing Studios are still around.

This was already tried by Americans, and failed, with the remake of The Ladykillers (1955). The 2004 version had top directors, top actors, and a big budget, but still failed terribly. This pretty well proves that the British have to make their own remakes.

But, if they do so, they could choose from a fine selection:

Whiskey Galore! (1949)
Passport to Pimlico (1949)
Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949)
The Lavender Hill Mob (1951)
The Man in the White Suit (1951)
The Titfield Thunderbolt (1953)

And they then might re-remake The Ladykillers.


50 posted on 06/13/2010 8:36:07 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piroque

Iron Eagle... I thought that was a movie about golf.


51 posted on 06/13/2010 8:40:10 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Lefties, left to their own devices, eventually screw up their own wet dreams.


52 posted on 06/13/2010 8:44:11 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

fox


53 posted on 06/13/2010 8:50:57 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

+1

Additionally, there’s no way Hollywood could remake the movie, without turning it into a PC bunch of fluff.

No way.

Hollywood is now so utterly leftist, it is impossible for any major studio to turn out anything but propaganda for the left.

Thing is, the left isn’t interested in patriotic movies.

So the movie was guaranteed to be a flop. No conservatives would go because it would be leftist propaganda.

And leftists wouldn’t go because it would be too patriotic.

In other words, it was guaranteed to be a huge flop.

I expect the exact same scenario, for the eventual “Atlas Shrugged”.


54 posted on 06/13/2010 8:57:23 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; m18436572; InShanghai; xrp; ...

Xer Ping

Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.

Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.  

55 posted on 06/13/2010 9:41:06 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

And LA, Coastal cleanup movie.


56 posted on 06/13/2010 9:50:17 AM PDT by omega4179 (www.jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Sci-Fi channel’s Dune I thought was superior to the original.


57 posted on 06/13/2010 9:59:14 AM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
So the movie was guaranteed to be a flop. No conservatives would go because it would be leftist propaganda.

No conservatives bothered to see The Hurt Locker either. That movie was a box office flop. Yet it was everything people on this forum seem to ask for from Hollywood; action packed, pro-America, pro-U.S. military, Muslim bad guys. Performed dismally in the theater.

Everyone went to see Avatar instead.

58 posted on 06/13/2010 10:11:10 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Ah yes, "kind hearts and coronets" starring Alec Guinness and... well that's it really. I think he played almost all the roles.

CC

59 posted on 06/13/2010 10:12:11 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (ostende mihi pecuniam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

The Gone with the Wind sequel was so bad- you are right. My 12 year old could have written it better. Almost the worst was it appeared that the author didn’t read the first book- just watched the movie (which was excellent, but changed something very big from the book- that Scarlett had more than one child). I want to burn the memory of that from my brain almost more than the Star Wars prequels.


60 posted on 06/13/2010 10:13:09 AM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson