Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sperm in all animals originated 600 mil. years ago
MSNBC ^ | July 15, 2010 | Live Science Staff

Posted on 07/16/2010 6:19:00 PM PDT by swatbuznik

A gene responsible for sperm production is so vital that its function has remained unaltered throughout evolution and is found in almost all animals, according to a new study. The results suggest the ability to produce sperm originated 600 million years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: boyareourtailstired; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; sperm; theycanbarelyswim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2010 6:19:06 PM PDT by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

prove it.


2 posted on 07/16/2010 6:20:05 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Lying, socialist thieves. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

“and is found in almost all animals”

At least the male however, so many females today prefer neutered males it is open to question.


3 posted on 07/16/2010 6:21:37 PM PDT by edcoil (OK, so what's the speed of dark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik
They seem to constantly make discoveries showing that all of the really essential stuff was present -- POOF! -- right at the beginning when life was starting out. Then, for the next 600 million years or so, some incidental stuff changed around.

Reminds of a book I once read. I liked the book better.

4 posted on 07/16/2010 6:23:16 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Just ask one of Larry King’s ex-wives. :-)


5 posted on 07/16/2010 6:26:46 PM PDT by hometoroost (McCain is a Ron and Nancy Republican: Campaigns like Reagan, governs like Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
They seem to constantly make discoveries showing that all of the really essential stuff was present -- POOF! -- right at the beginning when life was starting out.

Except that, you know, the evidence we have so far is that life was starting out about 3.8 billion years ago and this study shows sperm originating 600 million years ago. That's a 3.2 billion-year-gap, so not exactly "POOF!"
6 posted on 07/16/2010 6:28:49 PM PDT by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

I think his well went dry many years ago.


7 posted on 07/16/2010 6:30:50 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop thinking about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
Late Cretaceous I believe.
8 posted on 07/16/2010 6:36:35 PM PDT by hometoroost (McCain is a Ron and Nancy Republican: Campaigns like Reagan, governs like Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: y'all
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
9 posted on 07/16/2010 6:38:37 PM PDT by Cyber Ninja (Rebuke, Renounce, Repeal, Repeat,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

Sorta thin on facts isn’t it?


10 posted on 07/16/2010 6:39:28 PM PDT by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
About 600 million years ago, the Cambrian Explosion occurred (so they say). They say Explosion. I say Poof. It's a controversial event in which most of the major groups of complex life suddenly arrive on the scene. Since then, the groups seem to have been tweaked, but there hasn't been such a repetition of sudden Life.

Science has not yet settled on an explanation.

11 posted on 07/16/2010 6:41:34 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik
The findings were unexpected because many sex-specific genes, including other genes involved in sperm production, are usually under evolutionary pressure to change.

So when a gene changes, that is proof of evolution. But when a gene does not change, even when it was expected to, that is also proof of evolution.

12 posted on 07/16/2010 6:42:03 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Then how did man and animals reproduce b4 the 600M year milestone?


13 posted on 07/16/2010 6:44:26 PM PDT by CTOCS (I live in my own little world. But, it's okay. They know me there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

Prognosticating something... ANYTHING.. 600,000,000 years ago is laughable in the extreme..


14 posted on 07/16/2010 6:45:48 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost
Just ask one of Larry King’s ex-wives. :-)

L.

O.

L.

15 posted on 07/16/2010 6:50:08 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Lying, socialist thieves. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

If the Cambrian ‘Explosion’ coincided with the origination of sperm cells, then they may be onto the reason why life’s variety ‘exploded’ when it did.


16 posted on 07/16/2010 7:06:14 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mjp
So when a gene changes, that is proof of evolution. But when a gene does not change, even when it was expected to, that is also proof of evolution.

Genes that do not change over time imply that their function was critical enough to not allow the change without drastically impacting the survivability of the individual (and the species, as the change accumulates in the species' genome). It's not as if all genes are randomly changing to whatever they may change to. It all depends on the selective pressures and the allowances that permit the accommodation of those changes.

17 posted on 07/16/2010 7:10:04 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

The theory raises questions.

What was the sequence of progression from no-sperm critters to virile critters?

You’ve got a whole hardware store of parts to assemble in order to have a functioning sperm-producing animal. There are nerves, hormones, sperm-making cells, genes, not to mention the body and swimmer tail of the sperm itself, along with the built-in understanding that they have a destination and function.

Then you’ve got the whole mechanism to deliver the sperm, the tubing, blood supply, stimulant mechanism, and the ejaculatory musculature.

Then, in the same generational sequence and locale, you’ve got to explain how the female system showed up on the scene with all of its hormones, tubing, sperm-receiving hardware, nerves, ovaries, eggs, genes, blood supply, and the knowledge to use the package in concert with the male.

And then you’ve got to get the boys and girls working fast to do this because you’ve got one generation to get this done before the species dies off.

They’ll need Barry White to set the mood.

This is why my copy of The Blind Watchmaker is all scribbled with margin notes. Evolutionary theory sure is fun.


18 posted on 07/16/2010 7:13:22 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

It depends on what the said organism was like, 600 million years ago. One cannot assume that the sperm cell did not change during the time from then to now - thus affecting the assumptions regarding what sort of delivery mechanisms and support structures might have been required to enable its function, initially.

For example, female bed bugs are impregnated by male bed bugs injecting sperm directly into the female’s bodies, by puncturing its physical integrity.


19 posted on 07/16/2010 7:21:44 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

bump for later


20 posted on 07/16/2010 7:22:03 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson