Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glenn Beck Accused Redcoats of Burning Churches ("VANITY")
N/A | 8/28/2010 | Me

Posted on 08/28/2010 7:51:41 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel

I didn't see any comments about Glenn Beck's 1st words on his Friday TV show.

He talked about the "Black Robe Regiment", and said that Brits largely blamed churches/preachers for fomenting the Revolution.

Then he said as a result, when the Redcoats came here upon the war starting, they burned churches because of this. Then he said they even "locked up people inside and burned them".


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: americanhistory; americanrevolution; beck; churchburning; glennbeck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: TommyDale
Good rally.. I thought I might be/get bored...
Cudos to Beck... Well done so far..

Lord knows how many are watching that couldn't make it..

61 posted on 08/28/2010 9:28:26 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Right. Not only that, the left must be cringing to see Martin Luther King’s niece there, references to God, no violence... ABCCBSNBC et al will be greatly disappointed.


62 posted on 08/28/2010 9:33:27 AM PDT by TommyDale (Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

PC or not, Marion - the “Swamp Fox - was a fantastic military leader!


63 posted on 08/28/2010 9:35:30 AM PDT by kimmie7 (THE CROSS - Today, Tomorrow and Always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

You forgot one.. the most obvious liberal/leftist source/network of anti-american bias/spin.... PBS..


64 posted on 08/28/2010 9:41:44 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The next time the “British” fight us, their names will be Abdul, Muhammed and Hussein.


65 posted on 08/28/2010 9:54:33 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Revolutionary Fighting Ground
South of Newark (N.J.), just over the line in Union County, lies a region which was fighting ground again and again during the War for Independence, when it formed a part of the town of Newark. This historic soil comprises Springfield, Connecticut Farms, and what is now called Union Centre, and every American schoolboy knows that the Battle of Springfield, fought on June 1780, was one of the most glorious achievements of the patriot arms. A memorable incident of that battle was the part played by James Caldwell, the “Fighting Parson.” The Americans ran short of wadding. Pastor Caldwell ran into the Presbyterian church, gathered the hymn books from the pews, and distributed them to the soldiers, yelling: “Put Watts into ‘em boys; give ‘em Watts!” So well did the “boys” follow their chaplain’s advice that very soon Knyphausen and his Hessians beat a hasty retreat out of New Jersey. A Hessian detachment earlier in the same year had burned and pillaged Connecticut Farms and killed many of the peaceful denizens including the pastor’s wife, Mrs. Hannah Ogden Caldwell, who was shot to death as she held her babe in her arms. The Presbyterian church, founded in 1746, burned by the British in 1780 and rebuilt in 1786, stands on the original site; the Revolutionary burying ground, with a monument to the heroes of 1780 whose bones rest there, is a shrine for American patriots, and in the schoolyard they may see the cannon which barked from Tin Kettle Hill and helped scare off the redcoats.
Source: Official Guide and Manual of the 250th Anniversary Celebration of the Founding of Newark, New Jersey.


66 posted on 08/28/2010 10:00:11 AM PDT by Manao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel; SunkenCiv
I very well remember discussions of that scene from The Patriot and the discussions it engendered (on Free Republic and elsewhere). What I remember was that there was never a documented case of church-burning with parishioners inside. The closest I saw to any person-burning was one account of the aftermath of the Battles of either Brandywine or Germantown (sorry, I cannot remember which one) some Continental Soldiers were set on fire (were they dead or merely wounded??).

But be cautious here: misinformation was put out by both sides during the RevWar.

67 posted on 08/28/2010 10:05:04 AM PDT by Pharmboy (What always made the state a hell has been that man tried to make it heaven-Hoelderlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The broad judgment of history is that during the Revolution, Americans transgressed the laws of war more than the British did. Of course, the comparison is not equal in that most Americans had only a hazy notion of the laws of war while the British were schooled in them.

The worst savageries took place on the frontier involving ad hoc Patriot and Loyalist militias infused with criminality and revenge. In the Second Amendment, the phrase "well regulated militia" reflects that experience by qualifying the endorsement of militias.

"The Patriot" did a fine job with the battle of Cowpens. I nearly gagged though on the bi-racial calypso music wedding celebration. And as much as the British may at times have burned down churches, they did not do so with people in them.

68 posted on 08/28/2010 10:06:19 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: madison10

See my comment at #68.


69 posted on 08/28/2010 10:07:31 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Beck probably got his idea from the movie The Patriot

Ridiculous! Beck researches and reads. If you watched the show you would realize that his documentation is currently the best you will ever find. In the limited time he has on the air it is hard to condense but it is amazing how well he manages it.

70 posted on 08/28/2010 10:09:18 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Not only that, the left must be cringing to see Martin Luther King’s niece there, references to God, no violence...

And I am willing to wager that, like last year's 9/12 rally in D.C., there will be minimal cleanup needed behind these crowds. If so, I somehow think that the MSM will ignore it again, "nothing good can come out of Galilee"!

71 posted on 08/28/2010 10:11:40 AM PDT by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

About every five years, I take up reading about the Revolution and the making of the Constitution. Every time, I find new aspects that surprise me.


72 posted on 08/28/2010 10:11:50 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
If you read back to the thread you find that a church at a plantation was burned down with the owner and his family inside.

There were plenty of homes, barns, outbuildings and other structures burned down with people in them.

One of my distant Murphy ancestors was a young teenager when he escorted Hairbuyer Harris back for trial. You can imagine how well behaved Hairbuyer must have been with a teenager guarding him ~ because a teenager would blow his brains out for looking at him cross-eyed. They're not really adults you know.

The Brits misused the Mohawk warrior society though. For whatever reason the Mohawks avoided the ceremonial cannibalism that usually attended their wars.

73 posted on 08/28/2010 10:12:35 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Your question is totally appropriate, and the larger question about the Brits burning churches is, of course they did, and they disliked the Presbyterians immensely. John Witherspoon was a Signer, a Scot/Presbyterian minister and President of Princeton (College of NJ at the time). He ran off to fight the Brits. There were many other Presby ministers who did the same.

The point is: did they ever burn churches with people inside? As I mentioned above, I know of no evidence for this.

And have a look at this.

74 posted on 08/28/2010 10:18:34 AM PDT by Pharmboy (What always made the state a hell has been that man tried to make it heaven-Hoelderlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

For a very graphic, very violent history of Pontiac’s Rebellion, let me recommend the two volume set (1851) by Francis Parkman. They are very detailed, yet surprisingly pleasant to read, as Parkman was a gifted narrative writer:

http://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Pontiac-Indian-Conquest-Canada/dp/080328733X

The Conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian War after the Conquest of Canada, Volume 1: To the Massacre at Michillimackinac

http://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Pontiac-Indian-Conquest-Canada/dp/0803287372

The Conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian War after the Conquest of Canada, Volume 2: From the Spring of 1763 to the Death of Pontiac


75 posted on 08/28/2010 10:21:48 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The problem I have is with the claim that burning churches was a deliberate British policy. Similarly, although the Allies destroyed thousands of churches in WW II — and at time with people in them — that was not our policy but a result of normal military operations and practices such as aerial bombardment of cities.


76 posted on 08/28/2010 10:30:01 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: kimmie7

Pension Application of Manual (Manuel) McConnell: S2773 ~ this guy is one my ancestors, and also ancestor to Senator McConnell. .................. We are very distant cousins ~ lots of procreating in between and lots and lots of McConnells. ............... You go to page 63 of the following document to find his pension application. He was involved in most of the bloodiest and most important fighting in the Southern Theatre ~ and he was engaged in a chase after Tarleton’s entourage and Tarleton himself......... He served initially under an officer who’d been in the war against the Cherokee and who’d tried to avoid involvement in the Revolution. He finally came out of his self-imposed military retirement to join the Rebels when the Brits burned down his plantation and everything he had. .............. You read through the section I’ve pointed to, and all the footnotes, and you get an idea of what it took to win freedom, and it wasn’t pretty, and it wasn’t easy, and it wasn’t clean ~ kind of like a years long 24/7 Bruce Willis movie where no one ever takes a bath, and all your buddies are dead ~ ........ ~ well, anyway, see: http://southerncampaign.org/newsletter/v4n123.pdf


77 posted on 08/28/2010 10:49:16 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There is an important distinction between isolated incidents of church burning and a general British policy to burn churches, which was not the case.

I suppose that you mean to refer to British General "Hair Buyer" Hamilton. Bravo for the distinction of having an American ancestor who was a captor and escort of that scoundrel.

The Indians paid dearly for their support for the British. After the Revolution, Americans regarded Indians as an existential menace on the frontier, to be marginalized or eliminated when possible.

78 posted on 08/28/2010 10:57:26 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
Right ~ I've got Hairbuyer loaded into my memory module along with a vast number of Harrisons (all part of the family genealogy) so I slipped right by "hamilton" to Harris, because I know the guy wasn't a harrison ~ no way.

Actually, the Indians had already ceased to be a relevant force on the Eastern Seaboard as early as 1648 when about 95% of them died. The Iroquois barely maintained political existence ~ fortunately for them they had rights to TAKE Mingo children to raise up as warriors, and did so. The numbers were modest ~ in the tens of thousands.

Really angered the remaining Indians West of the Appalachians Fur Shur.

The wars against/with the Indians that follow 1648 reflect the rising strength of the Old World populations ~ the fact the Indians lost them all reflect their loss of strength. The Iriquois were no longer able to fight the Mohicans, and they'd had that war going for several hundred years. The conflict predated the Iroquois Confederation ~

i think Indians were better known for not even being around than anything else. They were viewed as easy targets after 1648.

79 posted on 08/28/2010 11:07:44 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: LS
James Webb pointed that out in his book "Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America"
80 posted on 08/28/2010 11:08:36 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson