Posted on 11/04/2010 1:21:08 PM PDT by UnChained
As soon as Obama spoke to the kindergarten kid about the pizza sharing principle we knew he was Marxist.
After we saw him disregard the will of the people on health care we knew he was dangerous, after we saw him illegally seize GM we knew he was amoral.
I believe he is willing to do anything to further his agenda. If he could Nuke congress and get away with it, he would do it.
If we were to be properly paranoid, what could he do as president to deal with the change in the House?
That’s okay.
The people with Balmoral blood will fix his water and turn back his crazy azz agenda.
Bankrupt the country.
Open doors to terrorism.
Increase inflation through printing more ‘money.’
Set racial group against racial group.
That’s for starters.....
wait till the prosecutions start
You knew when America gave him a pass on the ‘Rev.’ Wright flap, that the canary was dead.
AN amoral President can do a lot of damage.
You left out when he told Joe the Plumber he was going to “spread the wealth”
When Nixon was perceived as over-stepping his bounds, the GOP leadership approached him and convinced him that it was time to depart. I’m baffled that there’s no one in the ‘RAT ranks (either in Congress, among the large donors, or in the pretender’s inner circle) who has been willing to confront him in similar fashion.
Dude!
It’s 1 O’Clock where I am at and I having nightmares in the middle of the day.
Unreal.
If we were to be properly paranoid, what could he do as president to deal with the change in the House?
_____________________________________________
Ohhhh, I dunno. What about take 34 warships to India for a 10 day 2 Billion Dollar trip?
(Nahh. forget it. NOBODY could be that paranoid to think a president could do that!)
“wait till the prosecutions start’
You mean like the post Reichstag fire housecleaning in Parliment til the opposition is gone?
Look at the title of the article and then consider what values they represent.
It ain’t gonna happen except as an issue of continuance.
Mark my words. Barry Fauxbama will absolutely give an LBJ speech.
“If we were to be properly paranoid, what could he do as president to deal with the change in the House?”
If he were smart, he would encourage Republicans to have full hearings on the science of global warming, then contrive with his media friends to highlight and show only the libertarian nut case politicians and “think tank” kooks making the case the no pollution is bad, Rachel Carson is a liar, DDT is good for you, freedom to pollute and on. Then, and only then I believe, can Obama install cap and trade by stealthy regulation while the public is confused and appalled.
Other than that the carbon traders, he has served all the corporate interests that sponsor him, though I guess he could get more of our money to back overly expensive nuclear energy.
watch for scandals....
He said yesterday that there were other ways (other than legislative) to effect carbon reductions. So expect agency attempts to regulate this.
In my opinion he was only half-hearted in the way he said it, saying it only to pretend as if he took the issue honestly, rather than having cap and trade be the target alone. Part of the game for the insiders is a continual effort to imply the game is NOT about cap and trade, but the “science” or “carbon” the environment, etc.
But that leaves him with two options. He can talk the game not intending to do anything, since the end game was Cap and Trade. Or he can implement agency restrictions and then make the case that Cap and Trade would be better than the restrictions he has implemented.
The greater concern is his mentality that he can effect great change without congress. My fear is that he is right and can do much harm through agengy regulations. He said wealth distribution had to be done administratively long before he was elected. His comment yesterday, just shows he is still thinking he can remake things in his communist image, with or without congress.
The hope is that he is so disheartened by the shellacking and the public rejection that he gives up and does nothing.
“Or he can implement agency restrictions and then make the case that Cap and Trade would be better than the restrictions he has implemented.”
Darn, he may very well do that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.