Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ban Ki-Moon: "We need Revolution"
Youtube ^ | 1/28/2011 | United Nations

Posted on 02/10/2011 7:03:24 AM PST by wheresmyusa

"It may sound strange to speak of Revolution, but that is what we need at this time. We need a Revolution; revolutionary thinking, revolutionary action. It is easy to mouth the words "sustainable development", but to make it happen, we have to be prepared to make major changes."

Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, United Nations Davos World Economic Forum 2011


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: agenda21; commies; communism; davos; economy; green; moon; moonbat; revolution; un; watermelon
Pinging Glenn Beck.....
1 posted on 02/10/2011 7:03:27 AM PST by wheresmyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER; Domestic Church; rightly_dividing; combat_boots; bronxville; cripplecreek; Gipper08; ..

Ping.


2 posted on 02/10/2011 7:04:26 AM PST by wheresmyusa (FTUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

Just what we need to pour some more gasoline on the fires - the leader of a pseudo world government fomenting anarchy. Great.


3 posted on 02/10/2011 7:07:59 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Stop the change - I want to get off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

Glenn ran the story on the Blaze and spoke about it on Monday of last week.


4 posted on 02/10/2011 7:11:41 AM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa
We need a Revolution

So our Soros stooges can step in and take over without those messy expensive elections.

5 posted on 02/10/2011 7:13:24 AM PST by listenhillary (20 years in Reverend Wright's church is all I need to determine the "content of his character")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

Human rights group decries soft response to abuse
By Associated Press
An international human rights group believes that many governments and global institutions, including the European Union and the United Nations, are not pressing abusive nations hard enough to respect human rights.
Human Rights Watch, in its World Report 2011 for release on Monday, decried the increasing use of dialogue and cooperation to urge reforms — but without any teeth to ensure that change occurs.
“Dialogue and cooperation have their place, but the burden should be on the abusive government to show a genuine willingness to improve,” Kenneth Roth, executive director of the group, said in a statement accompanying the report. “In the absence of the demonstrated political will by abusive governments to make change, governments of good will need to apply pressure to end repression.”

Human Rights Watch said that recent examples of governments’ failures to exert pressure on abusive nations included “the near-universal cowardice in confronting China’s deepening crackdown on basic liberties.” Many countries seeking economic cooperation with China fear offending the emerging superpower on rights issues.
It praised the Norwegian Nobel committee for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to imprisoned Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo despite China’s displeasure.
Other examples cited by the group of failure to act included:
— The EU’s “obsequious approach toward Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.”
— The West’s “soft reaction to certain favored African autocrats, such as Paul Kagame of Rwanda and Meles Zenawi of Ethiopia.”
The report was especially critical of the EU and the UN for “soft-talking” human rights abusers.
“The ritualistic support of dialogue and cooperation with repressive governments is too often an excuse for doing nothing about human rights,” Roth said. “The EU’s ‘constructive dialogues’ are among the most egregious examples of this global trend.”
Human Rights Watch said the EU’s “record of discrimination and rising intolerance against migrants, Muslims, Roma, and others” along with other abusive practices suggest the EU and its member states “need to show greater political commitment to ensure that respect for human rights at home matches the EU’s rhetoric abroad.”
“The use of dialogue and cooperation in lieu of pressure has emerged with a vengeance at the United Nations, from Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to many members of the Human Rights Council,” the group said. It criticized as an example “the United Nations’ deferential attitude toward Sri Lankan wartime atrocities.”
U.S. President Barack Obama also came in for disapproval, with Human Rights Watch saying that “his eloquent statements have not always been followed by concrete actions.”
It said U.S. government agencies, including the Defense Department and U.S. embassies, “often deliver divergent messages” about human rights.


6 posted on 02/10/2011 7:14:33 AM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

Why can we not run the UN out of the country?


7 posted on 02/10/2011 7:19:49 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

In this day when we’re using the word de-fund in Congress, here’s a guy who could use a few billion fewer dollars.


8 posted on 02/10/2011 7:20:33 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

missed it! =/


9 posted on 02/10/2011 7:20:37 AM PST by wheresmyusa (FTUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

No biggie.

Here’s the story.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/un-sec-gen-calls-for-revolution-world-economic-system-is-global-suicide-pact/


10 posted on 02/10/2011 7:22:55 AM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

“we have to be prepared to make major changes” = “you have to be prepared to accept the major changes we the elite will try to force upon you”.

And who was it that said, “ Barack Obama will require you to work... He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism, that you put down your division, that you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones, that you push yourselves to be better, and that you engage.”


11 posted on 02/10/2011 7:31:22 AM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

why are we still giving Ban Ki Moonbat and the UN any $ ?


12 posted on 02/10/2011 7:41:17 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

Be careful what you wish for, Bankey.


13 posted on 02/10/2011 7:43:46 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

The left should be very careful about wishing for a world revolution. They will not get a democracy nor a seat in the new seats of power but rather a dictator very eager to eliminate any competition.

Historically, the FIRST people eliminated are professional agitators, non cooperative media, professional actors, lawyers,homosexuals and pretty much of the rest of the useful idiot mouth pieces that primarily make up the left.

Dictators, often do not eliminate much of the working class folks which just happen to be the majority of the conservatives in the USA. Someone has to keep the machines running.


14 posted on 02/10/2011 7:59:06 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

You say you’ll change the constitution
Well you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it’s the institution
Well you know
You better free your mind instead


15 posted on 02/10/2011 8:00:03 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

16 posted on 02/10/2011 8:01:20 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

I’d like to start the revolution by tarring and feathering Ban Ki Moon.


17 posted on 02/10/2011 8:27:54 AM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge
The left should be very careful about wishing for a world revolution. They will not get a democracy nor a seat in the new seats of power but rather a dictator very eager to eliminate any competition.

Or, the end of a rope. Either way, it isn't going to work out well for them.

18 posted on 02/10/2011 8:32:35 AM PST by Noumenon ("We should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hanged.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks wheresmyusa.
19 posted on 02/10/2011 9:23:35 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson