Click the album cover and you shall be purified, with the help of the last, greatest 3-man band.
Posted on 07/10/2011 10:20:02 PM PDT by freedumb2003
Here I ask ALL "Objectives" to register.
Those who dare to go against the cults of personality that swarm around us here at FR.
The important thing here is Objective. Predictions: be objective and provide your rationale.
Political analysis: be objective and provide your rationale.
Join, provide a single statement that files in the face of emotion but is objective, and you can add "Member of the Objectives" to your signature or (for the more objective accolades) tag.
I support Herman Cain and think he will be a great President. He has all bona fide Conservative qualities and qualifications.
Objectively: He still has not much name recognition and is slow to garner it AND his support of fair tax as part of his POTUS run could keep him from getting the nod.
Note: I want him to win, I think he could win, of he gets the nod I think he WILL win, but he has to overcome these problems.
IBTZ.
LOL!!
Good one!
And maybe called for!
Bachman is declared, politically savy, seems poised to pick up Iowa, is ten points out AHEAD of Romney, according to the Repulican publication in Iowa, has single handedly put Pawlenty in the dust already, and certainly has a decent shot at South Carolina. She has the most compelling personal story of all the candidates and was instrumental in making the Tea Party a force in Congress. She votes right, talks right, and she is proving her intellect. she broke out in the debate and remains unafraid of the media and critics. All this is good for pulling in more cash and more endorsements to go for the long haul. We will see what happens when she hits the moderate states if she can keep her base and reach for the Independents.
I am leaning toward Rick Perry and would like to see him get in to see how he does and what he has to say. I believe Rick can go all the way to the White House, if he runs well. IF he gets in.
I would object. But I hate to be objectified. Sorry if you find it objectionable.
How many hard working, decent electrons needlessly died in the making of this vanity?
I say we all bow our heads and reflect on their passing for sixty seconds.
-
-
Ok, time’s up. Gotta run!
I tried to file in the face of objective. I filed it in with the “O”’s.
It is an objective truth that a dismaying percentage of posts on FR are neither calculated, nor rational, nor logical, nor free from emotional drivel.
If you try to correct someone's logic you are castigated in posts that are less logical, less rational, and more emotional.
There are also a rather large number of shills doing their dirty work on FR. Their posts are only logical and rational in that, if believed and acted on by a sufficient number of Freepers, they will allow the shills to profit.
It would be nice if FR could in part be a safe place for the honing of arguments and debating techniques. It is more often a place for the reiteration and exaggeration of bogus arguments and poor debating tactics.
Gresham's Law is too often in full force.
>>I say we all bow our heads and reflect on their passing for sixty seconds.<<
Next time say 2 “holy Holleriths,” 3 “believe me, Babbages” and 8 “Gates’” and your electrons will be purified.
Good grief. Even your vanities are rank with priggish condescension.
IBTLOZ
All I can say is “preach it, baby.”
Also, I found out tonight that “debate” is a term that is best left unused in most threads. It makes some people (interestingly, those without forensic background nor knowledge) “uncomfortable.”
>>Good grief. Even your vanities are rank with priggish condescension.<<
And, here you are.
Care to register as an Objective? Or continue to be a Subjective?
Don’t flatter yourself. I’m just here to watch the kitties.
Only the Funk can purify your electrons, maggot brain ;-)
You mean that tonight you saw this quote by the owner. "No thank you. FR is not a debating society. Jim Robinson"
You were not alone.
But your discomfort with debate was quite palpable.
And understandable.
LOL, very fitting for your vanity thread, you didn’t make any sense.
Click the album cover and you shall be purified, with the help of the last, greatest 3-man band.
And very fitting for your response, you are a little slow on the uptake to understand what I posted.
I appreciate consistency.
So, I assume I can put you down as a "Subjective."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
