Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lancing the "She Quit!" Boil One Last Time
Tuesday July 12, 2011 | Gargantua

Posted on 07/12/2011 10:47:52 AM PDT by Gargantua

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: GlockLady
I think it was prior to her administration, though not 100% sure.

When I do a google search, I find something on the State of Alaska website called the "Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act". It's dated 07/10/07.

Not sure what to make of that.

61 posted on 07/12/2011 2:07:48 PM PDT by Wissa (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

“In Alaska, by Law, the Governor is not represented by the State A. G., and must pay for their own defense. Now you know why... because it’s the Law.”

This is all we need to say to those who disparage her. Alaska’s the only state that doesn’t protect its governor from frivolous lawsuits. Palin was defending herself from 19 frivolous lawsuits on her own dime. It was taking over her life, her finances, and her governorship. She won all 19 cases, by the way. Every one of them was groundless and she was exonerated.


62 posted on 07/12/2011 2:25:02 PM PDT by Melian ("I can't spare this [wo]man; [s]he fights!" (Apologies to Abe Lincoln) Go, Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

The spinners are desperate for something on Sarah Palin. Hard up, actually.


63 posted on 07/12/2011 3:05:21 PM PDT by RoadTest (Organized religion is no substitute for the relationship the living God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

Good point!


64 posted on 07/12/2011 3:06:10 PM PDT by RoadTest (Organized religion is no substitute for the relationship the living God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GlockLady
"Do you suppose when they realize that won’t work they will resort to actual physical assassination??????"

That would be their last act in what had up until then been a peaceful conservative rebellion. I figure the streets would run red with what's left of the Left.

In fact, Sarah is surrounded by a phalanx of snake-eaters committed to her preservation. I pity the imbecile who makes a play for her. He'll probably be caught up short prior to mission success, and just never seen or heard from again.

Buh-bye.

8^/

65 posted on 07/12/2011 3:08:10 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Palin 2012 ~ Going Oval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
"So far all of her forays have her enemies heads smoking. She’s a brilliant strategist and tactician who takes names and never forgets."

Well, aren't you the observant one! Seriously.

I have a photo of her from right before the Biden Debate, where she's looking at him through her glasses, smiling with her teeth, asking if it's okay if she calls him "Joe."

The look terrifies me; like a lioness about to grab an ibis. It gives me goosebumps and makes the hair on my neck stand up. What a feral predator she is. Not the gal I want gunning for me, I'll tell you.

She would make such a phenomenal kick-ass president. Lord willing.

8^\

66 posted on 07/12/2011 3:16:26 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Palin 2012 ~ Going Oval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

You have to be careful when using words like “all” and “every”. That sets a pretty high standard and I suspect you haven’t done the research to back up your assertion.

Generally, the word “abdicate” implies a formal and permanent relinquishment of one’s position or responsibilities, and you used it within the context of a discussion of Sarah Palin’s resignation. It’s not unreasonable to assume you used “abdicate” as a synonym for “quit”.

All I’m saying is that “abdicate” probably wasn’t the best choice of words in this case.

Thank you for clarifying your statement. The insult wasn’t necessary, however.


67 posted on 07/12/2011 3:54:06 PM PDT by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Did you ever quit a trial halfway through it?


68 posted on 07/12/2011 3:57:37 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Boop His Nose

Diving Tiger Says
Time to Support Free Republic

Give whatever you can

Or sign up to donate monthly
and a sponsoring FReeper will contribute $10

69 posted on 07/12/2011 4:08:38 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
More obfuscatory blather from someone caught speaking before thinking. Here's a clue, Blabatron:

Nowere in my article did I use the term "abdicate." Each and every "all" and "every" that I did use, I used with full knowledge and specific intent. They are intentional, and precise, not to mention correct.

You can find far more fruitful ways to waste your time than to try to pick apart my writings, especially given your own now repeatedly demonstrated inablity to comprehend what you've read.

And just for your pointless edification, it wasn't an "insult." It was a justified reprimand, which apparently you don't deal with very well.

8^\

70 posted on 07/12/2011 4:29:23 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Palin 2012 ~ Going Oval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Exactly, and at the time and still I called it a political masterstroke. Has she started a trend? Now Ron Paul admits tacitly that running for Prez is a full-time job and that it is impossible to simultaneously be a Rep, or a Gov, at the same time.


71 posted on 07/12/2011 4:34:09 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wissa

That was the law Palin signed that the left used to pick on her.

She was elected in the 2006 election.


72 posted on 07/12/2011 4:37:21 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

From the East Wing of the White Hut, are you sure you can see the Potomac River? ... Are you sure you’re not related to Tina Fey?


73 posted on 07/12/2011 4:51:46 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

No, he’s entitled to his opinion. Didn’t see any PDS. It’s every man’s God given right to be wrong ;)

However that “Holiest of Holies” crap pegged you pretty well.


74 posted on 07/12/2011 4:55:20 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua; All
Here we go again.

In her resignation speech, Palin (™) mentions the lawsuits but doesn't give that as the reason for her resignation.

From the resignation speech of Sarah Palin (™):

And so as I thought about this announcement that I wouldn’t run for re-election and what it means for Alaska, I thought about how much fun some governors have as lame ducks… travel around the state, to the Lower 48 (maybe), overseas on international trade – as so many politicians do. And then I thought – that’s what’s wrong – many just accept that lame duck status, hit the road, draw the paycheck, and “milk it”. I’m not putting Alaska through that – I promised efficiencies and effectiveness! ? That’s not how I am wired. I am not wired to operate under the same old “politics as usual.” I promised that four years ago – and I meant it.

You can read the full transcript here and watch the speech here: Part1 Part2

I don't know how you can claim lame duck status when you have 16 months left in your term.

A few months later with Bill O'Reilly, she again cited the "lame duck" status as her reason for quitting.

75 posted on 07/12/2011 5:07:47 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

Exactly, for the most part, only the winners leave their current office. A very few people quit their current office to run for higher, but most losers stay with their current office. And that doesnt even apply to Sarah’s case because, she didnt quit to run in the election or for higher office. She quit later on for personal reasons. Its disingenuous to lump her in with people who quit their post in order to announce their run for higher office.


76 posted on 07/12/2011 5:15:01 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

And so the “Head Hater” makes an appearance on yet another Palin thread.


77 posted on 07/12/2011 5:16:56 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

>>Didn’t see any PDS. It’s every man’s God given right to be wrong ;)<<

Yep, no reverse PDS.

>>However that “Holiest of Holies” crap pegged you pretty well.<<

One need only look at the responses to the post to come to a conclusion.


78 posted on 07/12/2011 5:17:04 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

To be fair, she may have had more than just personal reasons for stepping aside to let someone else be the Governor ... how eefective as the leader of the state do you think she could be while hounded daily by endless baseless lawsuits which she had to answer every time one came up? Sarah Palin is the kind of character who puts those she serves ahead of her, and if she felt she could not be the effective governor Alaskans’ needed, she has the integrity to step aside regardless of the snapping dogs waiting to attack her without thought to what real character means.


79 posted on 07/12/2011 5:23:47 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

To be fair, she may have had more than just personal reasons for stepping aside to let someone else be the Governor ... how effective as the leader of the state do you think she could be while hounded daily by endless baseless lawsuits which she had to answer every time one came up? Sarah Palin is the kind of character who puts those she serves ahead of her, and if she felt she could not be the effective governor Alaskans’ needed, she has the integrity to step aside regardless of the snapping dogs waiting to attack her without thought to what real character means.


80 posted on 07/12/2011 5:24:21 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson